Dear all, Packaging IRanges for Fedora [1] I would like to ask some question. Could the license of the library be clarify ? The DESCRIPTION file says Artistic License 2.0 but several source files contains the statement: * This file is copyright 2002 Jim Kent, but license is hereby * granted for all use - public, private or commercial. */ which is not the same as "Artistic License 2.0". Could that be clarified ? We also see some warnings while compiling it: IntervalTree.c:48: warning: missing braces around initializer memalloc.c:293: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 2 has type 'size_t' memalloc.c:293: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'size_t' Creating a generic for "cbind" in package "IRanges" (the supplied definition differs from and overrides the implicit generic in package "base": Signatures differ: (...), (deparse.level)) Creating a generic for "rbind" in package "IRanges" (the supplied definition differs from and overrides the implicit generic in package "base": Signatures differ: (...), (deparse.level)) Can these be safely ignored ? Thanks in advance for your help, Best regards, Pierre [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Pierre-Yves <pingou@pingoured.fr> wrote: > Dear all, > > Packaging IRanges for Fedora [1] I would like to ask some question. > > Could the license of the library be clarify ? > The DESCRIPTION file says Artistic License 2.0 but several source files > contains the statement: > * This file is copyright 2002 Jim Kent, but license is hereby > * granted for all use - public, private or commercial. */ > which is not the same as "Artistic License 2.0". > Could that be clarified ? > > We also see some warnings while compiling it: > IntervalTree.c:48: warning: missing braces around initializer > memalloc.c:293: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 2 > has type 'size_t' > memalloc.c:293: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 > has type 'size_t' > These are probably harmless but easy to rectify. > > Creating a generic for "cbind" in package "IRanges" > (the supplied definition differs from and overrides the implicit generic > in package "base": Signatures differ: (...), (deparse.level)) > Creating a generic for "rbind" in package "IRanges" > (the supplied definition differs from and overrides the implicit generic > in package "base": Signatures differ: (...), (deparse.level)) > These are intentional and may be ignored. > > Can these be safely ignored ? > > Thanks in advance for your help, > > Best regards, > > Pierre > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]