probe ID for affymetrix data
1
0
Entering edit mode
Xingmei Wang ▴ 40
@xingmei-wang-3107
Last seen 11.2 years ago
Hi all, I have problems analyzing affymetrix data and would like to seek help from the list. 1. I tried to create the design file by copying the design table from abf1 data. In Windows version R2.8.0, the data name is "abf1", while in Unix R2.8.0, the data name is "abf1.raw". Why? 2. I saw probeID for abf1 data has the following format: "1415670_at" "1415671_at" "1415672_at" "1415673_at" "1415674_a_at". But the probe IDs I obtained from my data look like this: "7892501" "7892502" "7892503" "7892504" "7892505" "7892506" "7892507" "7892508" "7892509" "7892510" Is there something wrong with my data? Thanks!
probe probe • 2.3k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@james-w-macdonald-5106
Last seen 1 day ago
United States
Hi Xingmei Wang, Xingmei Wang wrote: > Hi all, > I have problems analyzing affymetrix data and would like to seek help from the > list. > 1. I tried to create the design file by copying the design table from abf1 > data. In Windows version R2.8.0, the data name is "abf1", while in Unix > R2.8.0, the data name is "abf1.raw". Why? I assume because you named it that way. R doesn't append different things to variable names randomly (or based on the OS). > > 2. I saw probeID for abf1 data has the following format: > "1415670_at" "1415671_at" "1415672_at" "1415673_at" "1415674_a_at". > But the probe IDs I obtained from my data look like this: > "7892501" "7892502" "7892503" "7892504" "7892505" "7892506" "7892507" > "7892508" "7892509" "7892510" > Is there something wrong with my data? Well, the probe IDs for abf1 appear to come from the Mouse430_2 chip, and your data appear to be from either a Human Exon ST or Gene ST chip. So it depends on what exactly you mean by 'wrong'. I think you need to think a bit more about what you are doing and what you expect, and perhaps then you will be able to formulate a question that can be answered by someone on this list. Right now it isn't clear to me what you have done, nor is it clear what you expect, so it is impossible to help clear up any misunderstanding you may be having. Also, please read the posting guide: http://www.bioconductor.org/docs/postingGuide.html Asking the right question in a reasonable manner is not that difficult, but it does take some work on your part, and the likelihood of getting answered is often directly proportional to how well you ask the question in the first place. Best, Jim > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor -- James W. MacDonald, M.S. Biostatistician Douglas Lab 5912 Buhl 1241 E. Catherine St. Ann Arbor MI 48109-5618 734-615-7826
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Thank you Jim for kindly answering my questions! Very much appreciated!! James W. MacDonald wrote: > Hi Xingmei Wang, > > Xingmei Wang wrote: >> Hi all, >> I have problems analyzing affymetrix data and would like to seek help >> from the list. >> 1. I tried to create the design file by copying the design table from >> abf1 data. In Windows version R2.8.0, the data name is "abf1", while >> in Unix R2.8.0, the data name is "abf1.raw". Why? > > I assume because you named it that way. R doesn't append different > things to variable names randomly (or based on the OS). *I didn't name abf1 data. It's a data coming with package "maanova". I assumed people on this list have experience using this data. :-P * > >> >> 2. I saw probeID for abf1 data has the following format: >> "1415670_at" "1415671_at" "1415672_at" "1415673_at" >> "1415674_a_at". But the probe IDs I obtained from my data look like >> this: >> "7892501" "7892502" "7892503" "7892504" "7892505" "7892506" "7892507" >> "7892508" "7892509" "7892510" >> Is there something wrong with my data? > > Well, the probe IDs for abf1 appear to come from the Mouse430_2 chip, > and your data appear to be from either a Human Exon ST or Gene ST > chip. So it depends on what exactly you mean by 'wrong'. *Thanks for this answer! My data did come from a Human Exon ST chip* > > I think you need to think a bit more about what you are doing and what > you expect, and perhaps then you will be able to formulate a question > that can be answered by someone on this list. Right now it isn't clear > to me what you have done, nor is it clear what you expect, so it is > impossible to help clear up any misunderstanding you may be having. > *Sorry if I didn't make my questions clear! I indeed don't have much experience on genetics data, so it's hard to formulate a question. I'll try to do more research on the archives next time.* > Also, please read the posting guide: > > http://www.bioconductor.org/docs/postingGuide.html > > Asking the right question in a reasonable manner is not that > difficult, but it does take some work on your part, and the likelihood > of getting answered is often directly proportional to how well you ask > the question in the first place. *Totally agree!!* > > Best, > > Jim > > > >> >> Thanks! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioconductor mailing list >> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >> Search the archives: >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > -- Xingmei wang , MS Biostatistician Biostatistics Analysis Center (BAC) University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics 519 Blockley Hall 423 Guardian Drive Philadelphia, PA 19104 Phone: 215-898-1560 Fax: 215-573-1203 Email: xwang5 at mail.med.upenn.edu Website: http://www.cceb.med.upenn.edu/services/bac/
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 550 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6