A question about multiple analysis
1
0
Entering edit mode
@marcelo-luiz-de-laia-377
Last seen 10.2 years ago
Hi All I analyzed an experiment using marrayNorm to normalize the data and limma to verify the differentialy expressed genes. The experiment is composed for two varieties of plants, susceptible and resistant, to a phytophatogenic microorganism. Each one of the two varieties was divided in two groups, treated (experiment) and not treated (control). Therefore, we have the following layout: resistant |-> not treated ->| variety |-> treated susceptible |-> not treated ->| variety |-> treated As I said above, I only analyzed inside (treat x not treated) of each variety. I would like to know if is possible to verify the differentialy expressed genes between the varieties, or either, to compare the susceptible variety with the resistant variety, using Bioconductor and R. How I could make this? To compare treated susceptible variety with treated resistant variety? Or to compare not treated susceptible variety with not treated resistant variety? Or both? Thanks Marcelo Luiz de Laia, M.Sc. Dep. de Tecnologia, Lab. Bioqu?mica e de Biologia Molecular Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castelane, Km 05 14.884-900 - Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil PhoneFax: 16 3209-2675/2676/2677 R. 202/208/203 (trab.) Phone res: 16 3203 2328 - www.lbm.fcav.unesp.br - mlaia@yahoo.com ---
• 868 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@gordon-smyth
Last seen 1 hour ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia
At 02:38 AM 16/11/2003, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote: >Hi All > >I analyzed an experiment using marrayNorm to normalize the data and limma to >verify the differentialy expressed genes. > >The experiment is composed for two varieties of plants, susceptible and >resistant, to a phytophatogenic microorganism. Each one of the two varieties >was divided in two groups, treated (experiment) and not treated (control). >Therefore, we have the following layout: > >resistant |-> not treated > ->| >variety |-> treated > > >susceptible |-> not treated > ->| >variety |-> treated > >As I said above, I only analyzed inside (treat x not treated) of each >variety. > >I would like to know if is possible to verify the differentialy expressed >genes between the varieties, or either, to compare the susceptible variety >with the resistant variety, using Bioconductor and R. I am assuming that you have made microarrays which compare treated and not treated samples for each of the varieties individually, but that you have no microarrays which compare samples from two different varieties. If this is correct, then limma does not allow you to compare the two varieties. I don't know of any software in Bioconductor which allows you to do this, at least not at this time. What you need is sometimes called a "single-channel" analysis. You could try the mixed model method implemented in R/maanova from Gary Churchill's lab site http://www.jax.org/staff/churchill/labsite/software/index.html You might consider using normalizeBetweenArrays() in limma before exporting you data to maanova. Even using single-channel software, comparisons between varieties will be intrinsically noisier than comparisons between treated and untreated, because you didn't design these comparisons into your experiment. Gordon >How I could make this? To compare treated susceptible variety with treated >resistant variety? Or to compare not treated susceptible variety with not >treated resistant variety? Or both? > >Thanks > > >Marcelo Luiz de Laia, M.Sc. >Dep. de Tecnologia, Lab. Bioqu?mica e de Biologia Molecular >Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP >Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castelane, Km 05 >14.884-900 - Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil >PhoneFax: 16 3209-2675/2676/2677 R. 202/208/203 (trab.) >Phone res: 16 3203 2328 - www.lbm.fcav.unesp.br - mlaia@yahoo.com
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 956 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6