On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Kurt Hornik <kurt.hornik@wu.ac.at> wrote: > >>>>> Dan Tenenbaum writes: > > > Hello, > > When running tools::checkRd() on a single .Rd file, should I expect the > > output to be the same as that generated by R CMD check when it checks .Rd > > files? > > This comes from checkDocFiles and not checkRd. There are several Rd > related test functions in tools. > > -k > Thanks! (ccing list so others can find out too) > > R CMD check finds the following warning: > > > * checking Rd \usage sections ... WARNING > >> Assignments in \usage in documentation object 'ilm': > >> result <- ilm(celfiles, threshold = 350, satLim = 10000) > >> Functions with \usage entries need to have the appropriate \alias > >> entries, and all their arguments documented. > >> The \usage entries must correspond to syntactically valid R code. > >> See the chapter 'Writing R documentation files' in manual 'Writing R > >> Extensions'. > > > > > That warning is in the file man/ilm.Rd. > > When I check that file in R, it returns no output: > > >> library(tools) > >> tools::checkRd("ilm.Rd") > >> > > > I'm running the same R in both cases. > > >> sessionInfo() > > R version 2.13.0 Under development (unstable) (2011-03-12 r54757) > > Platform: x86_64-pc-mingw32/x64 (64-bit) > > > locale: > > [1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252 > > [2] LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252 > > [3] LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252 > > [4] LC_NUMERIC=C > > [5] LC_TIME=English_United States.1252 > > > attached base packages: > > [1] tools stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods > > [8] base > > > Thanks > > Dan > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > ______________________________________________ > > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]