gcrma devel will be out of commission until april 1 or so.
the new version
will be much less memory intensive and there will be a justGCRMA
(thanks
to jim macdonald)
-r
Excellent news that there will be a speedier version. Have you yet
been
able to get an idea of how much faster it might be?
I eventually want to 'GCRMA' around 50-60 chips. Is this likely to
(ever?)
become possible on a modest PC (2GHz, 1MB RAM, win2k)?
If not is it possible to introduce a batch method into the package for
those wanting to deal with higher numbers of chips.
If the answer to both is no then what sort of PC have people had
success
with for different chip numbers, such as 50, 75, 100? The chips I'm
using
are ATH1 which have 22810 x 11 probepairs.
Thanks
Matt
hopefully. our goal is to be almost as efficient as the current
justRMA function. in any case we will try to put out some results for
memory and speed.
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Matthew Hannah wrote:
> Excellent news that there will be a speedier version. Have you yet
been
> able to get an idea of how much faster it might be?
>
> I eventually want to 'GCRMA' around 50-60 chips. Is this likely to
(ever?)
> become possible on a modest PC (2GHz, 1MB RAM, win2k)?
>
> If not is it possible to introduce a batch method into the package
for
> those wanting to deal with higher numbers of chips.
>
> If the answer to both is no then what sort of PC have people had
success
> with for different chip numbers, such as 50, 75, 100? The chips I'm
using
> are ATH1 which have 22810 x 11 probepairs.
>
> Thanks
> Matt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
>
