TopGO p-values VS DAVID p-values
0
1
Entering edit mode
Paul Geeleher ★ 1.3k
@paul-geeleher-2679
Last seen 10.3 years ago
Hi, I'm trying to reproduce results I got from DAVID (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) using topGO. For the GO MF category, the top 10 terms I get from topGO are basically the same as DAVID but the p-values are drastically different. I'm using a named factor (intGenes) to define my "interesting" and "uninteresting" gene symbols and as my microarray doesn't have an annotation I'm using "org.Hs.eg.db", then my code is as follows: GOdata <- new("topGOdata", ontology = "MF", allGenes = intGenes, annot = annFUN.org, mapping = "org.Hs.eg.db", ID="symbol", nodeSize=20) test.stat <- new("classicCount", testStatistic = GOFisherTest, name = "Fisher test") resultFisher <- getSigGroups(GOdata, test.stat) allRes <- GenTable(GOdata, classic = resultFisher, orderBy = "classic", ranksOf = "classic", topNodes = 10) My top result in DAVID has a fisher exact p-value of .006, but in "allRes" the same term (Term=sequence-specific DNA binding, annotated=518, significant=41, expected=18.92) only has a p-value of .31 (in the column labeled "classic"). Manually plugging the numbers into fishers.test() it looks like DAVID is much closer to what the p-value should be. Can anyone point me to where I've gone wrong with topGO cause I think I've followed the instructions correctly!? Thanks, Paul. -- Paul Geeleher (PhD Student) School of Mathematics, Statistics and Applied Mathematics National University of Ireland Galway Ireland -- www.bioinformaticstutorials.com
Microarray GO Category topGO Microarray GO Category topGO • 2.3k views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 639 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6