Question about interpretation of CHARM results
0
0
Entering edit mode
Andrew Jaffe ▴ 120
@andrew-jaffe-4820
Last seen 10.3 years ago
> What about peripheral blood where one may be measuring a signal from a variety of cell types or tissues? This would probably prove useful to you - I've played around with it, and ~450 of their training set probes are on the 450k. You can email the authors for their code. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/86/abstract >switching from 0.1% methylated to 99.9% methylated is probably a real effect. Switching from 1% to 3% across the board is probably technical artifacts. I think its unclear what these effects do (if anything). Effect sizes less than 1% (which get published) are probably less likely to be real, but these 1-3% effect size hits often replicate in external populations, even if the cpg has no effect on gene expression. -Andrew [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
• 722 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 741 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6