deseq2 plotMA
1
0
Entering edit mode
@jose-m-garcia-manteiga-6046
Last seen 7.7 years ago
Italy
Dear Michael, I am using DESeq2 for a factorial design. I have Celltype and condition as colData. I have used the formula ~ Celltype + Cellypte:condition as suggested by Steve Lianoglou elsewhere and then I look at the single comparisons in only one Celltype Everything works fine and I have good adj p values, genes make sene... The problem arises when I want to make an MA plot of the 2 conditions for one cell type. I call the function as DESeq2:: since I known there are some. Here is my code: > ddsFull class: DESeqDataSet dim: 54668 18 exptData(0): assays(1): counts rownames(54668): 5S_rRNA 61E3.4 ... snosnR66 yR211F11.2 rowData metadata column names(0): colnames(18): r3_1394_A r3_2435_A ... r3_1395_A r3_1395_B colData names(2): condition Celltype > design(ddsFull)<-formula(~ Celltype + Celltype:condition) > ddsFull.fact<-DESeq(ddsFull) estimating size factors estimating dispersions gene-wise dispersion estimates mean-dispersion relationship final dispersion estimates fitting model and testing 18 rows did not converge in beta, labelled in mcols(object)$betaConv. Use larger maxit argument with nbinomWaldTest > resultsNames(ddsFull.fact) [1] "Intercept" "Celltype_R6_vs_R3" "CelltypeR3.conditionKD" "CelltypeR6.conditionKD" "CelltypeR3.conditionOE" "CelltypeR6.conditionOE" Now, the problem: If I use plotMA as for the vignette: > DESeq2::plotMA(ddsFull.fact) I obtain a right graph but for the last value in the design formula: But if I try to plot for my contrasts of interest: > DESeq2::plotMA(ddsFull.fact, lfcColname="CelltypeR3.conditionKD") It looks as if the red points are spread over with no correlation to fold change, even with red points over the 0 fold change. I did not find the pvalueColname variable anymore on plotMA, I guess is the same as log2FC. If I create the results objects by: > resFull.KD<-results(ddsFull.fact,name="CelltypeR3.conditionKD") > resFull.OE<-results(ddsFull.fact,name="CelltypeR3.conditionOE") and try to make my own MA plot by: > col=ifelse(resFull.KD$padj>=0.1,"black","red3");plot(resFull.KD$base Mean,resFull.KD$log2FoldChange,log="x",col=col) It looks pretty convincing with the red points being those external to the cloud of maximal fold changes an high baseMean as it should > sessionInfo() R version 3.0.2 (2013-09-25) Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0 (64-bit) locale: [1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8 attached base packages: [1] grid parallel stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base other attached packages: [1] parathyroidSE_1.0.2 pasilla_0.2.16 DESeq_1.13.3 lattice_0.20-23 locfit_1.5-9.1 DEXSeq_1.7.22 BiocInstaller_1.12.0 [8] gplots_2.11.3 MASS_7.3-29 KernSmooth_2.23-10 caTools_1.14 gdata_2.13.2 gtools_3.1.0 AnnotationDbi_1.23.27 [15] Biobase_2.21.7 RSQLite_0.11.4 DBI_0.2-7 edgeR_3.3.8 limma_3.17.26 DESeq2_1.2.0 RcppArmadillo_0.3.910.0 [22] Rcpp_0.10.4 GenomicRanges_1.13.51 XVector_0.1.4 IRanges_1.19.38 BiocGenerics_0.7.5 loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] annotate_1.39.0 biomaRt_2.17.3 Biostrings_2.29.19 biovizBase_1.9.4 bitops_1.0-6 BSgenome_1.29.1 cluster_1.14.4 [8] colorspace_1.2-3 dichromat_2.0-0 digest_0.6.3 evaluate_0.5 formatR_0.9 genefilter_1.43.0 geneplotter_1.39.05 [15] GenomicFeatures_1.13.47 ggplot2_0.9.3.1 GO.db_2.10.1 gridSVG_1.3-1 gtable_0.1.2 Gviz_1.5.15 Hmisc_3.12-2 [22] httpuv_1.1.0 hwriter_1.3 interactiveDisplay_1.0.0 knitr_1.5 labeling_0.2 latticeExtra_0.6-26 munsell_0.4.2 [29] plyr_1.8 proto_0.3-10 RColorBrewer_1.0-5 RCurl_1.95-4.1 reshape2_1.2.2 RJSONIO_1.0-3 rpart_4.1-3 [36] Rsamtools_1.13.48 rtracklayer_1.21.12 scales_0.2.3 shiny_0.7.0 splines_3.0.2 statmod_1.4.18 stats4_3.0.2 [43] stringr_0.6.2 survival_2.37-4 tools_3.0.2 XML_3.95-0.2 xtable_1.7-1 zlibbioc_1.7.0 The same code had been used with older versions of DESeq2 (<1.13) with good results, the ones that did not contain the 'contrast' parameter in results(). Now with the newest I have this issue. What can be the trouble? Thanks Jose M. Garcia Manteiga PhD Data analyst in Functional Genomics Center for Translational Genomics and Bioinformatics DIBIT2-A3 Room 21 San Raffaele Scientific Institute Via Olgettina 58 20132 Milano Italy Office: +39 02 26439114 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
GO graph DESeq2 GO graph DESeq2 • 2.3k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@mikelove
Last seen 1 day ago
United States
hi Jose, Thanks for catching this bug. Some recent changes to the plotMA function in DESeq2 left out the use of the 'lfcColname' argument. I will fix this now, so check in 1-2 days for v1.2.1. Mike On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Garcia Manteiga Jose Manuel < garciamanteiga.josemanuel@hsr.it> wrote: > Dear Michael, > I am using DESeq2 for a factorial design. I have Celltype and condition as > colData. I have used the formula ~ Celltype + Cellypte:condition as > suggested by Steve Lianoglou elsewhere and then I look at the single > comparisons in only one Celltype > > Everything works fine and I have good adj p values, genes make sene... > > The problem arises when I want to make an *MA plot* of the 2 conditions > for one cell type. I call the function as DESeq2:: since I known there are > some. Here is my code: > > > ddsFull > > class: DESeqDataSet > dim: 54668 18 > exptData(0): > assays(1): counts > rownames(54668): 5S_rRNA 61E3.4 ... snosnR66 yR211F11.2 > rowData metadata column names(0): > colnames(18): r3_1394_A r3_2435_A ... r3_1395_A r3_1395_B > colData names(2): condition Celltype > > > design(ddsFull)<-formula(~ Celltype + Celltype:condition) > > > ddsFull.fact<-DESeq(ddsFull) > > estimating size factors > estimating dispersions > gene-wise dispersion estimates > mean-dispersion relationship > final dispersion estimates > fitting model and testing > 18 rows did not converge in beta, labelled in mcols(object)$betaConv. Use > larger maxit argument with nbinomWaldTest > > > resultsNames(ddsFull.fact) > [1] "Intercept" "Celltype_R6_vs_R3" > "CelltypeR3.conditionKD" "CelltypeR6.conditionKD" "CelltypeR3.conditionOE" > "CelltypeR6.conditionOE" > > Now, the problem: > > If I use plotMA as for the vignette: > > > *DESeq2*::plotMA(ddsFull.fact) > > I obtain a right graph but for the last value in the design formula: > > > But if I try to plot for my contrasts of interest: > > > DESeq2::plotMA(ddsFull.fact, lfcColname="CelltypeR3.conditionKD") > > > It looks as if the red points are spread over with no correlation to fold > change, even with red points over the 0 fold change. > > I did not find the pvalueColname variable anymore on plotMA, I guess is > the same as log2FC. > > If I create the results objects by: > > > resFull.KD<-results(ddsFull.fact,name="CelltypeR3.conditionKD") > > resFull.OE<-results(ddsFull.fact,name="CelltypeR3.conditionOE") > > and try to make my own MA plot by: > > > > col=ifelse(resFull.KD$padj>=0.1,"black","red3");plot(resFull.KD$base Mean,resFull.KD$log2FoldChange,log="x",col=col) > > > It looks pretty convincing with the red points being those external to the > cloud of maximal fold changes an high baseMean as it should > > > sessionInfo() > R version 3.0.2 (2013-09-25) > Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0 (64-bit) > > locale: > [1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8 > > attached base packages: > [1] grid parallel stats graphics grDevices utils datasets > methods base > > other attached packages: > [1] parathyroidSE_1.0.2 pasilla_0.2.16 DESeq_1.13.3 > lattice_0.20-23 locfit_1.5-9.1 DEXSeq_1.7.22 > BiocInstaller_1.12.0 > [8] gplots_2.11.3 MASS_7.3-29 KernSmooth_2.23-10 > caTools_1.14 gdata_2.13.2 gtools_3.1.0 > AnnotationDbi_1.23.27 > [15] Biobase_2.21.7 RSQLite_0.11.4 DBI_0.2-7 > edgeR_3.3.8 limma_3.17.26 DESeq2_1.2.0 > RcppArmadillo_0.3.910.0 > [22] Rcpp_0.10.4 GenomicRanges_1.13.51 XVector_0.1.4 > IRanges_1.19.38 BiocGenerics_0.7.5 > > loaded via a namespace (and not attached): > [1] annotate_1.39.0 biomaRt_2.17.3 Biostrings_2.29.19 > biovizBase_1.9.4 bitops_1.0-6 BSgenome_1.29.1 > cluster_1.14.4 > [8] colorspace_1.2-3 dichromat_2.0-0 digest_0.6.3 > evaluate_0.5 formatR_0.9 genefilter_1.43.0 > geneplotter_1.39.05 > [15] GenomicFeatures_1.13.47 ggplot2_0.9.3.1 GO.db_2.10.1 > gridSVG_1.3-1 gtable_0.1.2 Gviz_1.5.15 > Hmisc_3.12-2 > [22] httpuv_1.1.0 hwriter_1.3 > interactiveDisplay_1.0.0 knitr_1.5 labeling_0.2 > latticeExtra_0.6-26 munsell_0.4.2 > [29] plyr_1.8 proto_0.3-10 RColorBrewer_1.0-5 > RCurl_1.95-4.1 reshape2_1.2.2 RJSONIO_1.0-3 > rpart_4.1-3 > [36] Rsamtools_1.13.48 rtracklayer_1.21.12 scales_0.2.3 > shiny_0.7.0 splines_3.0.2 statmod_1.4.18 > stats4_3.0.2 > [43] stringr_0.6.2 survival_2.37-4 tools_3.0.2 > XML_3.95-0.2 xtable_1.7-1 zlibbioc_1.7.0 > > > > The same code had been used with older versions of DESeq2 (<1.13) with > good results, the ones that did not contain the 'contrast' parameter in > results(). Now with the newest I have this issue. > What can be the trouble? > Thanks > > > > Jose M. Garcia Manteiga PhD > > Data analyst in Functional Genomics > Center for Translational Genomics and Bioinformatics > DIBIT2-A3 Room 21 > San Raffaele Scientific Institute > Via Olgettina 58 > 20132 Milano > Italy > > Office: +39 02 26439114 > > > > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 753 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6