normalizeWithinArrays "composite"
1
0
Entering edit mode
@m-inmaculada-barrasa-879
Last seen 10.2 years ago
Dear all, I am trying to normalize a test array. I would like to use normalizeWithinArrays "composite", but I tried the other options too. When I do: MAloessNoC <- normalizeWithinArrays(RG, method = "loess", weights=NULL) MAloess <- normalizeWithinArrays(RG, method = "loess", weights=NULL, controls = nonDE) MAnone <- normalizeWithinArrays(RG, method = "none") I don't get any errors But when I do: MAcomp <- normalizeWithinArrays(RG, layout, method = "composite", weights=NULL, controls = nonDE) I get: Error in predLoess(object$y, object$x, newx, object$s, object$weights, : NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 3) Is my problem in the layout? How can I find out exactly where? Also, Is there any way to do a composite loess normalization using nonDifferentiallyExpressed genes, but without using print-tip loess normalization. (I was using a grid with 1 column and 1 row in my layout). Thanks a lot for your help Inma
Normalization Normalization • 1.0k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@gordon-smyth
Last seen 3 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia
At 09:27 AM 12/08/2004, M Inmaculada Barrasa wrote: >Dear all, > >I am trying to normalize a test array. I would like to use >normalizeWithinArrays "composite", but I tried the other options too. > >When I do: > >MAloessNoC <- normalizeWithinArrays(RG, method = "loess", weights=NULL) > >MAloess <- normalizeWithinArrays(RG, method = "loess", weights=NULL, >controls = nonDE) > > MAnone <- normalizeWithinArrays(RG, method = "none") > >I don't get any errors > >But when I do: > >MAcomp <- normalizeWithinArrays(RG, layout, method = "composite", >weights=NULL, controls = nonDE) > >I get: > >Error in predLoess(object$y, object$x, newx, object$s, object$weights, : > NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 3) > > >Is my problem in the layout? How can I find out exactly where? You may be running into a problem with NAs with "composite" normalization which was fixed in limma 1.7.4. Please upgrade your version of limma from http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/limma. The original implementation of composite normalization assumed that the control spots would not be missing which is apparently not so in your case. >Also, Is there any way to do a composite loess normalization using >nonDifferentiallyExpressed genes, but without using print-tip loess >normalization. (I was using a grid with 1 column and 1 row in my layout). Simply set your print layout information to have ngrid.c=1 and ngrid.r=1. However "composite" normalization will probably not make a lot of difference over ordinary loess normalization when you only have one grid. This is because the curves are based on so much data and are therefore very stable. Alternatively, the idea behind "composite" normalization is I think actually better achieved using weights than using the original "composite" normalization method. Just use RG$weights to up-weight your nonDE control spots, e.g., to twice or more of the weights of the other spots. The modifyWeights() function can help. Then you can use any normalization method you choose. Gordon >Thanks a lot for your help > >Inma
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 629 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6