hi,
i've been trying to get an idea about the implementation of the mas 5
backgound adjustment in the affy package. where it says in the sadd
a(x,y) = max( i(x,y)-b(x,y) , nf*n(x,y) ) where
i(x,y) = max(i(x,y),0.5)
i've just been able to find the first line implemented. where did i
miss the
second line? or is it not implemented becaus .5 is so small that it
should
rarely take effect? (if that's the case, which is my guess, why is it
in the
sadd?)
dennis
--
Max-Planck-Institute for Molecular Genetics
Computational Molecular Biology
Ihnestrasse 63-73
D-14195 Berlin
--
Tel: ++49 (30) 8413-1178
Fax: ++49 (30) 8413-1152
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 02:49, Dennis Kostka wrote:
> hi,
> i've been trying to get an idea about the implementation of the mas
5
> backgound adjustment in the affy package. where it says in the sadd
>
> a(x,y) = max( i(x,y)-b(x,y) , nf*n(x,y) ) where
> i(x,y) = max(i(x,y),0.5)
>
> i've just been able to find the first line implemented. where did i
miss the
> second line? or is it not implemented becaus .5 is so small that it
should
> rarely take effect?
Cell intensities that low are extremely rare in my experience. In fact
I
am not sure I have ever come across one. You'd be able to see if you
are
getting anywhere near that with your data by looking at the
min(pm(....)) and min(mm(....)) where .... is your AffyBatch.
> (if that's the case, which is my guess, why is it in the
> sadd?)
Affymetrix reason for doing things is not always clear.
Ben
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 16:23, Ben Bolstad wrote:
> Affymetrix reason for doing things is not always clear.
>
>
> Ben
thnx, just what i thought.
...but i'd still kind of like to know if i missed the second criterion
in the
code or if it's simply not there. so if anyone happens to know, i'd be
happy
about a quick note.
dennis
--
Max-Planck-Institute for Molecular Genetics
Computational Molecular Biology
Ihnestrasse 63-73
D-14195 Berlin
--
Tel: ++49 (30) 8413-1178
Fax: ++49 (30) 8413-1152