Binary CDF file
1
0
Entering edit mode
@andrewwwoostergskcom-1176
Last seen 10.3 years ago
Does Bioconductor support binary .CDF files? When I attempt to make a CDF package ad follows: make.cdf.package("U133AAofAv2.CDF") I get the following error message: Error in getInfoInFile(file, "CDF", unit = "Chip", property = "Name", : The file /home/aww35131/microarray/U133AAofAv2.CDF does not appear to be a CDF file. -Andrew [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
cdf cdf • 1.7k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@james-w-macdonald-5106
Last seen 12 hours ago
United States
andrew.w.wooster@gsk.com wrote: > Does Bioconductor support binary .CDF files? > > When I attempt to make a CDF package ad follows: > make.cdf.package("U133AAofAv2.CDF") > > I get the following error message: > Error in getInfoInFile(file, "CDF", unit = "Chip", property = "Name", : > The file /home/aww35131/microarray/U133AAofAv2.CDF does not appear > to be a CDF file. The current devel version of makecdfenv does support binary .cdf files. What version are you using? Jim > > -Andrew > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor -- James W. MacDonald Affymetrix and cDNA Microarray Core University of Michigan Cancer Center 1500 E. Medical Center Drive 7410 CCGC Ann Arbor MI 48109 734-647-5623
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
I am using version Bioconductor 1.5. How do I get the current devel version of makecdfenv? -Andrew "James W. MacDonald" <jmacdon@med.umich.edu> 05-Apr-2005 10:43 To andrew.w.wooster@gsk.com cc Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject Re: [BioC] Binary CDF file andrew.w.wooster@gsk.com wrote: > Does Bioconductor support binary .CDF files? > > When I attempt to make a CDF package ad follows: > make.cdf.package("U133AAofAv2.CDF") > > I get the following error message: > Error in getInfoInFile(file, "CDF", unit = "Chip", property = "Name", : > The file /home/aww35131/microarray/U133AAofAv2.CDF does not appear > to be a CDF file. The current devel version of makecdfenv does support binary .cdf files. What version are you using? Jim > > -Andrew > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor -- James W. MacDonald Affymetrix and cDNA Microarray Core University of Michigan Cancer Center 1500 E. Medical Center Drive 7410 CCGC Ann Arbor MI 48109 734-647-5623 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
andrew.w.wooster@gsk.com wrote: > > I am using version Bioconductor 1.5. How do I get the current devel > version of makecdfenv? Download R-2.1.0alpha, then use getBioC("affy", develOK=TRUE) -- James W. MacDonald Affymetrix and cDNA Microarray Core University of Michigan Cancer Center 1500 E. Medical Center Drive 7410 CCGC Ann Arbor MI 48109 734-647-5623
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
1) I create my own cdf and probe packages from a .CDF file as follows: cdfName <- "RAE230A" cdfFilename <- paste(cdfName,".CDF",sep=""); library(makecdfenv); make.cdf.package(filename=cdfFilename); library(matchprobes); makeProbePackage( cdfName, datafile=file(system.file(".",cdfFilename),open="r"), maintainer="<andrew.w.wooster@gsk.com>", version="0.0.1"); 2) I then run GCRMA as follows: library(gcrma); justGCRMA(); 3) I get the following error: Computing affinities.Error: length(prlen) == 1 is not TRUE The reason I create my own cdf and probe packages is because I have binary .CDF file. I originally saw this problem using the binary file. I then retried the steps above using the text RAE230A.CDF file - and got the same error. I am using the developers version of Bioconductor, which I downloaded yesterday April 5 2005 as follows: getBioC("affy", develOK=TRUE) I do not get the error if I use the RAE230A packages from the Bioconductor metadata repository. What am I missing? "James W. MacDonald" <jmacdon@med.umich.edu> 05-Apr-2005 10:43 To andrew.w.wooster@gsk.com cc Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject Re: [BioC] Binary CDF file andrew.w.wooster@gsk.com wrote: > Does Bioconductor support binary .CDF files? > > When I attempt to make a CDF package ad follows: > make.cdf.package("U133AAofAv2.CDF") > > I get the following error message: > Error in getInfoInFile(file, "CDF", unit = "Chip", property = "Name", : > The file /home/aww35131/microarray/U133AAofAv2.CDF does not appear > to be a CDF file. The current devel version of makecdfenv does support binary .cdf files. What version are you using? Jim > > -Andrew > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor -- James W. MacDonald Affymetrix and cDNA Microarray Core University of Michigan Cancer Center 1500 E. Medical Center Drive 7410 CCGC Ann Arbor MI 48109 734-647-5623 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
where do you get your probe package? try for example, probepkgname="hgu95aprobe" ###change this to your probe package name seq1=get(probepkgname) prlen=nchar(seq1$seq) range(prlen) you should get [1] 25 25 since affy probes are all 25-bases long. The error message you get seems to suggest that you have probes of other lengths On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 andrew.w.wooster@gsk.com wrote: > 1) I create my own cdf and probe packages from a .CDF file as follows: > > cdfName <- "RAE230A" > cdfFilename <- paste(cdfName,".CDF",sep=""); > > library(makecdfenv); > make.cdf.package(filename=cdfFilename); > > library(matchprobes); > makeProbePackage( > cdfName, > datafile=file(system.file(".",cdfFilename),open="r"), > maintainer="<andrew.w.wooster@gsk.com>", > version="0.0.1"); > > 2) I then run GCRMA as follows: > > library(gcrma); > justGCRMA(); > > 3) I get the following error: > > Computing affinities.Error: length(prlen) == 1 is not TRUE > > > The reason I create my own cdf and probe packages is because I have binary > .CDF file. I originally saw this problem using the binary file. I then > retried the steps above using the text RAE230A.CDF file - and got the same > error. > > I am using the developers version of Bioconductor, which I downloaded > yesterday April 5 2005 as follows: > getBioC("affy", develOK=TRUE) > > I do not get the error if I use the RAE230A packages from the Bioconductor > metadata repository. > > What am I missing? > > > > > "James W. MacDonald" <jmacdon@med.umich.edu> > 05-Apr-2005 10:43 > > To > andrew.w.wooster@gsk.com > cc > Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch > Subject > Re: [BioC] Binary CDF file > > > > > > > andrew.w.wooster@gsk.com wrote: > > Does Bioconductor support binary .CDF files? > > > > When I attempt to make a CDF package ad follows: > > make.cdf.package("U133AAofAv2.CDF") > > > > I get the following error message: > > Error in getInfoInFile(file, "CDF", unit = "Chip", property = "Name", > : > > The file /home/aww35131/microarray/U133AAofAv2.CDF does not > appear > > to be a CDF file. > > The current devel version of makecdfenv does support binary .cdf files. > What version are you using? > > Jim > > > > > > -Andrew > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Bioconductor mailing list > > Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > > > -- > James W. MacDonald > Affymetrix and cDNA Microarray Core > University of Michigan Cancer Center > 1500 E. Medical Center Drive > 7410 CCGC > Ann Arbor MI 48109 > 734-647-5623 > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
Dear Users, I have a PLMset and after visualising the NUSE boxplot, I would like to get the median SE values of the residuals for each of the arrays. How can I get them? I think NUSE plots are a good visual way of detecting outlier arrays, but I am trying to obtain a numerical value that would help me setting a QC cutoff and therefore be less subjective. Anyone has any comments on this idea? Thanks David
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 777 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6