No significant hits!
1
0
Entering edit mode
saudpabita • 0
@saudpabita-11200
Last seen 8.4 years ago

Hi all

I am using DEXSeq to analyse genome wide exon usage in RNA-Seq sample from maize. I have two factors data. One is condition (weedy/weed-free) and thiamethoxam treatment (treated/untreated). Each has 3 replicates. I wanted to see the differential exon usage for weedy versus weed-free, treated versus untreated and for interaction between condition and treatment. Here is my sample table :

                condition treatment replicate

WC_RepI        weedy untreated         1

WC_RepII       weedy untreated         2

WC_RepIII      weedy untreated         3

WCT_RepI       weedy   treated         1

WCT_RepII      weedy   treated         2

WCT_RepIII     weedy   treated         3

WFC_RepI   weed-free untreated       1

WFC_RepII  weed-free untreated       2

WFC_RepIII weed-free untreated       3

WFT_RepI   weed-free   treated         1

WFT_RepII  weed-free   treated         2

WFT_RepIII weed-free   treated         3

 

The DEXSeq dataset is 

dxd1= DEXSeqDataSetFromHTSeq(

  countFiles,

  sampleData=SampleTable,

  design=~sample+exon+treatment:exon+condition:exon,

  flattenedfile=annotfile)

 

The formula that I used for all 3 analysis;

For weedy vs weed-free,

formulaFullModel=~sample+exon+treatment:exon+condition:exon

formulaReducedModel=~sample+exon+treatment:exon

dxd_e1=estimateDispersions(dxd1,formula=formulaFullModel)

dxd_t1=testForDEU(dxd_e1,reducedModel=formulaReducedModel,fullModel=formulaFullModel)

dxd_fc1=estimateExonFoldChanges(dxd_t1,fitExpToVar = "condition")

dxr3=DEXSeqResults(dxd_fc1)

 

For treated vs untreated,

formulaFullModel_t=~sample+exon+condition:exon+treatment:exon

formulaReducedModel_t=~sample+exon+condition:exon

dxd_e2=estimateDispersions(dxd1,formula=formulaFullModel_t)

dxd_t2=testForDEU(dxd_e2,reducedModel=formulaReducedModel_t,fullModel=formulaFullModel_t)

dxd_fc2=estimateExonFoldChanges(dxd_t2,fitExpToVar = "treatment")

dxr2=DEXSeqResults(dxd_fc2)

 

For interaction,

colData(dxd1)$mix<-paste0(colData(dxd1)$condition,colData(dxd1)$treatment)

formulaFullModel_i=~sample+exon+condition:exon+treatment:exon+condition:treatment:exon

formulaReducedModel_i=~sample+exon+condition:exon+treatment:exon

dxd_e3=estimateDispersions(dxd1,formula=formulaFullModel_i)

dxd_t3=testForDEU(dxd_e3,reducedModel=formulaReducedModel_i,fullModel=formulaFullModel_i)

dxd_fc3=estimateExonFoldChanges(dxd_t3,fitExpToVar = "mix")

dxr3=DEXSeqResults(dxd_fc3)

 

For first two analysis I got same result with no significant hits for padj<0.1

While, for interaction I got 1 significant hit at padj<0.1.

I am just wondering if such results can be expected. Did I do wrong somewhere in the steps?

I will really appreciate your suggestions.

 

My session info :

R version 3.3.1 (2016-06-21)

Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)

Running under: Windows >= 8 x64 (build 9200)

 

locale:

[1] LC_COLLATE=English_Canada.1252  LC_CTYPE=English_Canada.1252   

[3] LC_MONETARY=English_Canada.1252 LC_NUMERIC=C                   

[5] LC_TIME=English_Canada.1252    

 

attached base packages:

[1] stats4    parallel  stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets 

[8] methods   base     

 

other attached packages:

 [1] genefilter_1.54.2          DEXSeq_1.18.4             

 [3] RColorBrewer_1.1-2         AnnotationDbi_1.34.4      

 [5] DESeq2_1.12.3              SummarizedExperiment_1.2.3

 [7] GenomicRanges_1.24.2       BiocInstaller_1.22.3      

 [9] GenomeInfoDb_1.8.3         IRanges_2.6.1             

[11] S4Vectors_0.10.2           Biobase_2.32.0            

[13] BiocGenerics_0.18.0        BiocParallel_1.6.3 

 

 

Thanks!

dexseq • 1.6k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Alejandro Reyes ★ 1.9k
@alejandro-reyes-5124
Last seen 5 months ago
Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Rese…

Hi!

The code looks fine!

Are the replicates in your analysis paired? If they are, you could try to introduce these variables in your models. 

Have you tried to do more exploratory analysis, such as PCA or clustering of your samples?  Do you see differences there between conditions or between treatments?

Alejandro

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Hi Alejandro,

Thank you for your reply. Yes, all the samples are paired. I will try to do as you suggest. I had introduced as "-p yes" while counting reads. I haven't done PCA or clustering yet. However, this data was used to identify differentially expressed gene using EdgeR, and showed hundreds of DE genes between the conditions/ treatment.

 

Thanks!

 

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Hi again,

I tried to introduce libtype "paired" in design, I got an error

Error in DESeqDataSet(rse, design, ignoreRank = TRUE) : 
  design contains one or more variables with all samples having the same value,
  remove these variables from the design

 

Pabita

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Hi Pabita, 

Could you include your model formulas?

Alejandro

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Hi Alejandro,

I am sorry, I did not understand what you exactly mean by " include your model formulas". I tried the following code then I got an error.

SampleTable = data.frame(
row.names = c("WC_RepI","WC_RepII","WC_RepIII","WCT_RepI","WCT_RepII","WCT_RepIII","WFC_RepI","WFC_RepII","WFC_RepIII","WFT_RepI","WFT_RepII","WFT_RepIII"),
condition=c("weedy","weedy","weedy","weedy","weedy","weedy","weed-free","weed-free","weed-free","weed-free","weed-free","weed-free"),
treatment=c("untreated","untreated","untreated","treated","treated","treated","untreated","untreated","untreated","treated","treated","treated"),
libtype=c(rep("paired",12)),
replicate =c("1","2","3","1","2","3","1","2","3","1","2","3")
)

suppressPackageStartupMessages(library("DEXSeq"))
dxd1= DEXSeqDataSetFromHTSeq(
  countFiles,
  sampleData=SampleTable,
  design=~sample+exon+libtype:exon+treatment:exon+condition:exon,
  flattenedfile=annotfile)

One more question. I am confused how the exon usage coefficients are calculated. I read the post   A: DEXSeq: question about usage coefficient and splicing plot , but still did not get what are the inputs for calculating it? And how the gene expression is deducted from overall expression leaving only exon usage effect?

Thanks! 

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Hi Pabita, 

Sorry I was not clear. Since your replicates are paired, it is possible that you have replicate-to-replicate variation that you can account for if you add this information to the GLMs. I mean something like this:

dxd1= DEXSeqDataSetFromHTSeq(countFiles,
  sampleData=SampleTable,
  design=~sample+exon+replicate:exon+treatment:exon+condition:exon,
  flattenedfile=annotfile)
formulaFullModel=~sample+exon+replicate:exon+treatment:exon+condition:exon
formulaReducedModel=~sample+exon+replicate:exon+treatment:exon

The details of the exon usage coefficients can be found in detail in the DEXSeq paper: http://genome.cshlp.org/content/22/10/2008.long

Alejandro

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Hi Alejandro,

Thank you for your suggestion. 

 

Pabita

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Hi Alejandro,

I tried with the models as you suggested, but there is no change in the result. 

 

Pabita

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 835 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6