User: rraadd_8

gravatar for rraadd_8
rraadd_80
Reputation:
0
Status:
New User
Location:
Last seen:
7 months, 1 week ago
Joined:
1 year ago
Email:
r*******@hotmail.com

Posts by rraadd_8

<prev • 6 results • page 1 of 1 • next >
0
votes
1
answers
749
views
1
answers
Comment: C: standard error value (lfcSE) returned by DeSeq2
... The answer of the question was indeed in the primary assumption of the tool itself. I should have taken that into account before going ahead. Remark 1 in particular is a very helpful general advise in this respect. Thanks a lot. solved!   ...
written 7 months ago by rraadd_80
0
votes
1
answers
749
views
1
answers
Comment: C: standard error value (lfcSE) returned by DeSeq2
... Yes. I wanted to `see whether one condition is more noisy than the other`. Biological question I was trying to answer was: `How much is the noise in my experiment (trt vs untrt)?` what I have is 1. counts (3 replicates each for trt and untrt) and 2. a DESeq2 result (log2FoldChange, lfcSE etc.) obta ...
written 7 months ago by rraadd_80
0
votes
1
answers
749
views
1
answers
Comment: C: standard error value (lfcSE) returned by DeSeq2
... sorry for the confusion. I am using "standard error: condition treated vs untreated" (from results columns) for the calculation. So, I meant individual calculation of variance associated with each LFC. So then the idea is to take sum of variances and divide it by square of n - which would give me ...
written 7 months ago by rraadd_80
0
votes
1
answers
749
views
1
answers
Comment: A: standard error value (lfcSE) returned by DeSeq2
... I have a question regarding the application of standard error. To get cumulative (gene-wide) error (noise) per condition I can do following steps. I can get variance (VAR) of each gene by multiplying standard error (SE) by square root of total number of genes (n) and then squaring it.  VAR=(SE*sqr ...
written 7 months ago by rraadd_80
0
votes
1
answers
240
views
1
answers
Comment: C: DeSeq2: Use negative numbers and fractions
... Thanks. I wonder if it is possible, (independent of DeSeq2) to use Wald test for negative numbers?  ...
written 12 months ago by rraadd_80
2
votes
1
answer
240
views
1
answer
DeSeq2: Use negative numbers and fractions
... Dear users, Instead of counts (non-negative integers) required by DeSeq2, I have negative numbers and fractions, and I need to use DeSeq's statistics to find out significantly up/down genes. Since for my data, min=-10 and max=10, I can convert it into counts by  first multiplying with a consta ...
deseq2 logfoldchange written 12 months ago by rraadd_80 • updated 12 months ago by Michael Love14k

Latest awards to rraadd_8

No awards yet. Soon to come :-)

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.2.0
Traffic: 390 users visited in the last hour