User: Thomas Carroll
Thomas Carroll • 400
- Reputation:
- 400
- Status:
- Trusted
- Location:
- United States/New York/The Rockefeller University
- Website:
- https://rockefelleruni...
- Scholar ID:
- Google Scholar Page
- Last seen:
- 7 months, 3 weeks ago
- Joined:
- 5 years, 1 month ago
- Email:
- t************@gmail.com
Posts by Thomas Carroll
<prev
• 100 results •
page 1 of 10 •
next >
0
votes
1
answer
254
views
1
answers
... hi Nicolas,
Thank you for bug report (and adding a fix!)
I will update this in release and development tomorrow.
Thanks again,
tom ...
written 8 months ago by
Thomas Carroll • 400
0
votes
1
answer
175
views
1
answers
Comment:
C: Problem with ChIPQC
... hi lionel,
This is not an error but a warning and your ChIPQC object has been returned and printed to screen successfully.
The warning is nothing to do with your data and something we will remove from future versions of ChIPQC.
tom ...
written 9 months ago by
Thomas Carroll • 400
0
votes
0
answers
319
views
0
answers
... hi,
I have added some code to remove peaks close to chromosome edges (within distance of window defined in profileWin parameter) and report number removed. Hopefully this is the issue.
This is in release ChIPQC version 1.18.2.
thank you for report,
tom ...
written 9 months ago by
Thomas Carroll • 400
0
votes
0
answers
319
views
0
answers
... hi,
I have added some code to remove peaks close to chromosome edges (within distance of window defined in profileWin parameter) and report number removed. Hopefully this is the issue.
This is in release ChIPQC version 1.18.2.
thank you for report,
tom ...
written 9 months ago by
Thomas Carroll • 400
0
votes
0
answers
319
views
0
answers
... hi,
I suspect this may be caused by some peaks being very close to chromosome start or ends. I will put in a fix for this case tonight and that may solve this issue.
Would you be able to share your bed files with me? If you can send a link to me at tcarroll(at)rockefeller.edu, then I could test tha ...
written 9 months ago by
Thomas Carroll • 400
0
votes
0
answers
319
views
0
answers
... hi,
I suspect this may be caused by some peaks being very close to chromosome start or ends. I will put in a fix for this case tonight and that may solve this issue.
Would you be able to share your bed files with me? If you can send a link to me at tcarroll(at)rockefeller.edu, then I could test tha ...
written 9 months ago by
Thomas Carroll • 400
0
votes
0
answers
300
views
0
answers
... hi,
I am unable to see some portions of your post.
Would it be possible to supply code and session information?
best,
tom ...
written 10 months ago by
Thomas Carroll • 400
0
votes
1
answer
224
views
1
answers
... hi Nik,
Sorry, this was fixed in release and not in development branch.
I have fixed in release and development last night and it should be available in release version 1.18.1 now.
best,
tom ...
written 10 months ago by
Thomas Carroll • 400
1
vote
2
answers
669
views
2
answers
... hi,
I have added the fix in development version ChIPQC 1.17.1 and to ChIPQC 1.16.1 now. Should be available from git repository and through biocLite tomorrow.
very best,
tom
...
written 15 months ago by
Thomas Carroll • 400
0
votes
2
answers
669
views
2
answers
... hi Herve,
Thank you for editing the error message.
tom
...
written 15 months ago by
Thomas Carroll • 400
Latest awards to Thomas Carroll
Supporter
14 months ago,
voted at least 25 times.
Scholar
2.5 years ago,
created an answer that has been accepted.
For A: ChIPQC v1.4 fails uninformatively where version 1.2 works fine
Scholar
2.5 years ago,
created an answer that has been accepted.
For A: ChIPQC v1.4 fails uninformatively where version 1.2 works fine
Scholar
2.5 years ago,
created an answer that has been accepted.
For A: ChIPQC v1.4 fails uninformatively where version 1.2 works fine
Scholar
2.7 years ago,
created an answer that has been accepted.
For A: ChIPQC v1.4 fails uninformatively where version 1.2 works fine
Scholar
3.9 years ago,
created an answer that has been accepted.
For A: ChIPQC v1.4 fails uninformatively where version 1.2 works fine
Scholar
3.9 years ago,
created an answer that has been accepted.
For A: shiftApply verbosity (in ChIPQC)
Scholar
3.9 years ago,
created an answer that has been accepted.
For A: ChIPQC and/or Diffbind - retrieving normalized read counts for peaks from single
Scholar
3.9 years ago,
created an answer that has been accepted.
For A: ChIPQC v1.4 fails uninformatively where version 1.2 works fine
Scholar
4.2 years ago,
created an answer that has been accepted.
For A: ChIPQC v1.4 fails uninformatively where version 1.2 works fine
Scholar
4.6 years ago,
created an answer that has been accepted.
For A: ChIPQC v1.4 fails uninformatively where version 1.2 works fine
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User
Agreement
and Privacy
Policy.
Powered by Biostar
version 16.09
Traffic: 213 users visited in the last hour