User: jovel_juan

gravatar for jovel_juan
jovel_juan10
Reputation:
10
Status:
New User
Location:
Canada
Last seen:
5 months, 3 weeks ago
Joined:
4 years, 8 months ago
Email:
j*********@hotmail.com

Posts by jovel_juan

<prev • 24 results • page 1 of 3 • next >
0
votes
1
answer
143
views
1
answers
Comment: A: DESeq2:varianceStabilizingTransformation suggested. Results suspicious
... This is a typical example, but all other comparisons have something similar. What to do? ...
written 6 months ago by jovel_juan10
0
votes
1
answer
143
views
1
answers
Comment: A: DESeq2:varianceStabilizingTransformation suggested. Results suspicious
... Sorry, figure did not load in the previous message. Here a new attempt. ![enter image description here][1] [1]: https://d5a9b722-a-e0c5cea3-s-sites.googlegroups.com/a/ualberta.ca/jjovel/juan-s-files/ctrl_vs_comb.png?attachauth=ANoY7cqFiA8HIU4XziQXGo-r-fITRB1NpWjmn6As0nG9XnxH7nvfAd9o9A8C90yQ8ost ...
written 6 months ago by jovel_juan10
0
votes
1
answer
143
views
1
answers
Comment: A: DESeq2:varianceStabilizingTransformation suggested. Results suspicious
... Thanks for your answer Mike! Those are cultured heart cells with a specific phenotype subjected to two different drugs or to the combination of both drugs. Each treatment was compared to non-treated cells. Please see attached PCA of one of the comparison throwing the referred warning. It is clear ...
written 6 months ago by jovel_juan10
0
votes
1
answer
143
views
1
answer
DESeq2:varianceStabilizingTransformation suggested. Results suspicious
... I run some analysis with DESeq2 and got the following warning: NOTES: - Data was quantified with Kallisto. - I did not aggregate the data at the gene level. I run it at the transcript level, and was using a cut-off of qval < 0.01, instead of 0.05. In this data, for 27.2% of genes with a sum of ...
deseq2 written 6 months ago by jovel_juan10
0
votes
1
answer
1.4k
views
1
answers
Comment: A: Justification for collapsing technical replicates in DESeq2
... And more generally, what would be the consequences of NOT collapsing technical replicates?  ...
written 17 months ago by jovel_juan10
0
votes
1
answer
1.4k
views
1
answers
Comment: A: Justification for collapsing technical replicates in DESeq2
... comment deleted. Sorry I did not find a way to delete my comment, since it was not a response to the question ...
written 17 months ago by jovel_juan10
0
votes
1
answer
1.4k
views
1
answers
Comment: A: Justification for collapsing technical replicates in DESeq2
... I moved my comment below ...
written 17 months ago by jovel_juan10
0
votes
1
answer
339
views
1
answers
Comment: A: How to handle strong batch effects
... Thanks Mike. Just to let you know, the difference between ~batch + condition AND ~ condition + batch, must be small. I get the same set of transcripts deregulated. The only difference I notice is that the FDR is a bit greater in the first case. ...
written 17 months ago by jovel_juan10
1
vote
1
answer
339
views
1
answer
How to handle strong batch effects
... In RNAseq experiments, batch effects are very strong. Here two situations I have observed often: 1. The same cell line is used to replicate an experiment and results between two experiments are quite different (see case1 plot). 2. Two groups of patients (in this case three and two) are sampled at ...
deseq2 written 17 months ago by jovel_juan10
0
votes
1
answer
265
views
1
answer
Splicing analysis with ASpli
... I am using ASpli for the first time. I have an experiment with about 50 libraries per group (responders vs non-responders to a treatment). Am I supposed to concatenate all *bam files for each group, and compare those consolidated bam files, OR should I run ASpli of each pair of samples (indeed, ther ...
aspli written 17 months ago by jovel_juan10 • updated 17 months ago by Dario Strbenac1.5k

Latest awards to jovel_juan

Popular Question 16 months ago, created a question with more than 1,000 views. For Normalization factors in metagenomeSeq

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 16.09
Traffic: 163 users visited in the last hour