Run tweeDEseq on Flux-capacitor RPKM values
1
0
Entering edit mode
vrehaman • 0
@vrehaman-14957
Last seen 18 months ago

Dear Team,

For Differential expression, we are using tweeDEseq method which will take read counts as input and normalize counts using TMM method and perform pair wise comparisons.

I have used Flux-capacitor for quantifying transcripts which gives read counts and RPKM values as output.

here is the few lines of output from flux-capacitor

18 ENSEMBL transcript 158483 213739 . + . transcript_id "ENST00000261601.5"; locus_id "18:158483-213739W"; gene_id "ENSG00000101557.8"; reads 4644.136719; length 4156; RPKM 2497.995850

18 ENSEMBL transcript 158483 213739 . + . transcript_id "ENST00000383589.1"; locus_id "18:158483-213739W"; gene_id "ENSG00000101557.8"; reads 2171.213379; length 4051; RPKM 1198.126099
18 ENSEMBL transcript 158536 211350 . + . transcript_id "ENST00000400266.3"; locus_id "18:158483-213739W"; gene_id "ENSG00000101557.8"; reads 72.650101; length 1681; RPKM 96.611931

And I have two questions with respect to input counts for tweeDEseq package.

1. Can I use RPKM values as input for tweedeseq package?

2. As RPKM values already already normalized counts, can I consider "reads" section as raw counts from flux-capacitor output and Is it ok to use the same as input to tweeDEseq?

Please suggest me.

Thanks In Advance

Fazulur Rehaman

 

tweedeseq differential expression • 567 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Robert Castelo ★ 2.7k
@rcastelo
Last seen 4 days ago
Barcelona/Universitat Pompeu Fabra

Dear Fazulur,

1. No, you can not use RPKM values as input to the tweeDEseq package. This package implements a statistical model based on Poisson-Tweedie distributions for count values and RPKM values are not count values.

2. No, for the same reason I give on your first question.

As a side note, while Flux Capacitor was one of the first available RNA-seq quantification methods, it seems that its development has been discontinued and other methods, such as Salmon or Kallisto, have been more recently developed for that purpose and are actively maintained. One of the authors of Kallisto described in a blog post why Flux Capacitor performs worse than other methods. Others in this forum may have additional recommendations but since this may be considered out of the realm of Bioconductor, you may be better off asking or googling elsewhere if you have further questions about RNA-seq quantification methods.

cheers,

robert.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Dear Robert,

Thanks a lot for your confirmation and we will surely try the other suggested methods.

Right now, we are using HTSeq for getting raw counts and using the same as input to tweeDeSeq. It is performing well.

Thanks & Regards

Fazulur Rehaman

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 280 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6