probe level summarization before classification
1
0
Entering edit mode
@talloen-willem-prdbe-1616
Last seen 9.6 years ago
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/attachments/20060220/ 83fa0003/attachment.pl
• 387 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Naomi Altman ★ 6.0k
@naomi-altman-380
Last seen 3.0 years ago
United States
It certainly affects differential expression analysis, so it is hard to imagine it will not affect clustering. --Naomi At 04:26 AM 2/20/2006, Talloen, Willem [PRDBE] wrote: >Dear BioC listers, > >I have a question regarding the preprocessing of the microarray data >(affymetrics HG-U133_Plus_2 chip) before sample classification. I was >wondering if summarization techniques might affect the performance of >classification methods. Has anyone experience with this? Or can someone give >suggestions whether (or when) to apply classification on the MAS 5.0, RMA, >GC-RMA or on the probe level data? > >I realize that this might be a difficult question with no definite answer, >but some clues would already be helpful as it is a fundamental issue. > >thanks in advance, >Willem Talloen > > > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > >_______________________________________________ >Bioconductor mailing list >Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor Naomi S. Altman 814-865-3791 (voice) Associate Professor Dept. of Statistics 814-863-7114 (fax) Penn State University 814-865-1348 (Statistics) University Park, PA 16802-2111
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 955 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6