Entering edit mode
Wolfgang Huber
★
13k
@wolfgang-huber-3550
Last seen 7 weeks ago
EMBL European Molecular Biology Laborat…
Dear David,
I would be interested to know how the signals of your negative
controls
looks as a function of GC content, e.g. the look of the plot
boxplot( y ~ gc )
where y are your normalized and (g)log transformed intensities for one
array, and gc the GC-content of the probes.
Best wishes
Wolfgang
------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Huber EBI/EMBL Cambridge UK http://www.ebi.ac.uk/huber
Sturgill, David (NIH/NIDDK) [C] wrote:
> I have a set of single channel expression data from Nimblegen. On
these arrays, there are no mismatch probes. We estimate background
with a subset of probes that target a very different organism and are
essentially negative controls. These 'background' probes are randomly
distributed so they broadly sample background across the array, and
generally provide some signal above just empty glass.
>
> Data are between-slide normalized in limma with vsn.
>
> I want to get a significance value for each gene just to say if it
is expressed or not (above background), with a simple test. For each
gene, for each experiment, I compare the probeset (20 probes per gene)
to my negative controls (~ 2000 probes) as vectors by Mann-Whitney
test:
>
> vector1 = intensities for probes targeting the gene
> vector2 = intensities for negative controls
> wilcox.test(vector1,vector2)
>
> If I have 5 replicate arrays, I can perform the test as above just
by combining intensities across experiments and comparing experimental
probes to controls as two vectors.
>
> I'm not sure this is really an appropriate way to handle replicates.
Is there another function like wilcox.test, that can compare two
matrices where replicates are in columns, and each matrix has a
different number of rows?
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Dave Sturgill
>
> davidsturgill[AT]niddk.nih.gov