Help in the normalization procedures of a cDNA microarray analysis by using limma (problem in dye effect)
1
0
Entering edit mode
Alex Tsoi ▴ 260
@alex-tsoi-2154
Last seen 10.2 years ago
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/attachments/20070619/ e555888d/attachment.pl
• 479 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Naomi Altman ★ 6.0k
@naomi-altman-380
Last seen 3.6 years ago
United States
I think you are pretty much stuck unless you have spiking controls on the array. The labeling efficiency is taken care of by the dye-swap design, but the overall reduction in transcription cannot be estimated without a stable standard. --Naomi At 12:20 PM 6/19/2007, Alex Tsoi wrote: >Dear all, > >I have four cDNA microarray data, two of them are control group, and the >other two are the experimental group (the two replicates within each group >has dye swamp) > >The design is: > >Control: > >First chip: >Green dye (time point 1) >Red dye (time point 2) > >Second chip: >Green dye (time point 2) >Red dye (time point 1) > > > > >Experimental group: > >First chip: >Green dye (time point 1) >Red dye (time point 2) > >Second chip: >Green dye (time point 2) >Red dye (time point 1) > > >Since we stop the transcription process after time point 1, so the mRNA >levels in time point 2 should be lower than the one in time point 1 ; >and we find that for some reason the red dye is much less effecicient than >the green dye, so in each chip the red dye is distributed in a lower density >than that of the green dye (no matter what time point does it represent) > >My goal is to identify those mRNA in the experimental group that has fold >change (in the two time points) different from that of the control group. > >I tried to use > > normalizeWithinArrays(method="loess", bc.method="normexp") > > normalizeBetweenArrays(method="quantile") > >but I eventually end up with all the dyes in each chip having very similar >distribution (but in fact I would like to have the time point 2 has similar >distirbution across each chip, and time point 1 has the similar distribution >across each chip, and the time point 2 should have lower intensity than that >of time point 1) > >I apologize that this is pretty much a procedure for microarray analysis >rather than a bioconductor - specific question, >and I greatly appreciate any help from the group. > > >-- >Lam C. Tsoi (Alex) >Medical University of South Carolina > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > >_______________________________________________ >Bioconductor mailing list >Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >Search the archives: >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor Naomi S. Altman 814-865-3791 (voice) Associate Professor Dept. of Statistics 814-863-7114 (fax) Penn State University 814-865-1348 (Statistics) University Park, PA 16802-2111
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/attachments/20070619/ ace39315/attachment.pl
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 605 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6