beadarray bead-level normalisation for single channel data
1
0
Entering edit mode
Asta Laiho ▴ 70
@asta-laiho-2025
Last seen 9.7 years ago
I have been using beadarray v. 1.5.10 to analyse bead-level Illumina data. At the moment the package does not support bead-level normalisation for single channel data. As I would be very interested in getting data quantile-normalised at the bead-level, before summarising, I would like to know if there are plans in the near future to add this feature in to the package. Greetings, Asta Laiho
beadarray beadarray • 848 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@oosting-j-path-412
Last seen 9.7 years ago
I have also thought about between array quantile normalization for bead arrays, but the implementation is not straightforward because the arrays have different numbers of (reported) beads. For quantile normalization it will probably be necessary to pad the arrays with smaller amounts of beads, where you would have to make a decision on what the values should be in the padded data. (ie. Pad the tails with the minimum and maximum values within the array, take a sample from the existing data, or sort the data and take datapoints at regular intervals) Jan Oosting > bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf Of Asta Laiho > I have been using beadarray v. 1.5.10 to analyse bead-level Illumina data. > At the moment the package does not support bead-level normalisation for > single channel data. As I would be very interested in getting data > quantile-normalised > at the bead-level, before summarising, I would like to know if there are > plans in the near > future to add this feature in to the package. > > Greetings, > Asta Laiho
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 499 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6