Help needed on limma and differentially expressed genes
1
0
Entering edit mode
Ng Stanley ▴ 230
@ng-stanley-2663
Last seen 10.3 years ago
Hi, The design model is attached to this email. I am using limma to analyze a set of microarray, but face with the difficulty on the design matrix and contrast matrix even after reading the limma userguide carefully. Basically, I need to exclude the effects of empty plasmid transfected into the cells. Then identify 1) differentially expressed genes at 8h and 16h induced by the over-expression of P53 with respect to 0h, 2) those genes that are differentially expressed from 8h to 16h induced by the over-expression of P53. The experiment assumes that Wild type at 8h and 16h are the same as at 0h, due to cost limitations. Please help. Thanks Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Design Model.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 13209 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/attachments/20080408 /96e2e7d4/attachment.pdf
Microarray limma Microarray limma • 1.4k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Jenny Drnevich ★ 2.2k
@jenny-drnevich-382
Last seen 10.3 years ago
Hi Stanley, In general, posting the same question 3 times to the list is LESS likely to get it answered; however, your 3rd posting was finally clear enough to understand. The design matrix you want to use is for a common reference design (7.3 in limma vignette), which will give you one column for each of your conditions: wild type 0h (Wt0), wild type empty plasmid 8 hr (E8), wild type P53 plasmid 8 hr (P8), E16 and P16. Then it is just a matter of setting up your contrasts "correctly". Based on my interpretation of what you want, I think that the Wt0 samples were unnecessary! My logic: a) You want the differently expressed genes induced by P8 compared to Wt0: P8 - Wt0 b) But you also want to exclude the effect of the empty plasmid, which is: E8 - Wt0 c) Putting the two together: (P8 - Wt0) - (E8 - Wt0) = P8 - E8 d) Likewise, to get the effect at 16h compared to 0h you would use: P16 - E16 e) The difference between 16h and 8 hr would be: (P16 - E16) - (P8 - E8) HTH, Jenny At 01:50 AM 4/8/2008, Ng Stanley wrote: >Hi, > >The design model is attached to this email. > >I am using limma to analyze a set of microarray, but face with the >difficulty on the design matrix and contrast matrix even after reading the >limma userguide carefully. Basically, I need to exclude the effects of empty >plasmid transfected into the cells. Then identify > >1) differentially expressed genes at 8h and 16h induced by the >over-expression of P53 with respect to 0h, >2) those genes that are differentially expressed from 8h to 16h induced by >the over-expression of P53. > >The experiment assumes that Wild type at 8h and 16h are the same as at 0h, >due to cost limitations. > >Please help. > >Thanks >Stanley > >Content-Type: application/pdf; name="Design Model.pdf" >X-Attachment-Id: f_fes3u99s0 >Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Design Model.pdf" > >_______________________________________________ >Bioconductor mailing list >Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >Search the archives: >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor Jenny Drnevich, Ph.D. Functional Genomics Bioinformatics Specialist W.M. Keck Center for Comparative and Functional Genomics Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign 330 ERML 1201 W. Gregory Dr. Urbana, IL 61801 USA ph: 217-244-7355 fax: 217-265-5066 e-mail: drnevich at uiuc.edu
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Hi Everyone, Apology, earlier two emails sent out via gmail and outlook messed up the alignment. Even I looking at them, confused me. So finally this last post got a response. Using Jenny's suggestion, I had similar idea that Wt0 samples were unneccessary. But try to explain that to a biologist, is much tougher as Wt0 is deemed the baseline. Couple of questions from my part: A) Does E8 - Wt0 really exclude the effect of the empty plasmid ? I am impressed by the limma user guide that the "-" sign means solely comparison in the log2 scale and would mean a fold change in the raw intensity. B) the pooled RNA were absent in the contrast matrix, can I safely set ref="Pooled RNA" in the design matrix More help please. Thanks finally. Stanley -----Original Message----- From: Jenny Drnevich [mailto:drnevich@uiuc.edu] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 23:09 To: Ng Stanley; bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [BioC] Help needed on limma and differentially expressed genes Hi Stanley, In general, posting the same question 3 times to the list is LESS likely to get it answered; however, your 3rd posting was finally clear enough to understand. The design matrix you want to use is for a common reference design (7.3 in limma vignette), which will give you one column for each of your conditions: wild type 0h (Wt0), wild type empty plasmid 8 hr (E8), wild type P53 plasmid 8 hr (P8), E16 and P16. Then it is just a matter of setting up your contrasts "correctly". Based on my interpretation of what you want, I think that the Wt0 samples were unnecessary! My logic: a) You want the differently expressed genes induced by P8 compared to Wt0: P8 - Wt0 b) But you also want to exclude the effect of the empty plasmid, which is: E8 - Wt0 c) Putting the two together: (P8 - Wt0) - (E8 - Wt0) = P8 - E8 d) Likewise, to get the effect at 16h compared to 0h you would use: P16 - E16 e) The difference between 16h and 8 hr would be: (P16 - E16) - (P8 - E8) HTH, Jenny At 01:50 AM 4/8/2008, Ng Stanley wrote: >Hi, > >The design model is attached to this email. > >I am using limma to analyze a set of microarray, but face with the >difficulty on the design matrix and contrast matrix even after reading >the limma userguide carefully. Basically, I need to exclude the effects >of empty plasmid transfected into the cells. Then identify > >1) differentially expressed genes at 8h and 16h induced by the >over-expression of P53 with respect to 0h, >2) those genes that are differentially expressed from 8h to 16h >induced by the over-expression of P53. > >The experiment assumes that Wild type at 8h and 16h are the same as at >0h, due to cost limitations. > >Please help. > >Thanks >Stanley > >Content-Type: application/pdf; name="Design Model.pdf" >X-Attachment-Id: f_fes3u99s0 >Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Design Model.pdf" > >_______________________________________________ >Bioconductor mailing list >Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >Search the archives: >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor Jenny Drnevich, Ph.D. Functional Genomics Bioinformatics Specialist W.M. Keck Center for Comparative and Functional Genomics Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign 330 ERML 1201 W. Gregory Dr. Urbana, IL 61801 USA ph: 217-244-7355 fax: 217-265-5066 e-mail: drnevich at uiuc.edu
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
> Using Jenny's suggestion, I had similar idea that Wt0 samples were > unneccessary. But try to explain that to a biologist, is much tougher as Wt0 > is deemed the baseline. Contrary to some generalised opinion among statisticians, biologists are not really really dumb... so maybe you should really try to explain that to them. They may surprise you! :-) Jose -- Dr. Jose I. de las Heras Email: J.delasHeras at ed.ac.uk The Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology Phone: +44 (0)131 6513374 Institute for Cell & Molecular Biology Fax: +44 (0)131 6507360 Swann Building, Mayfield Road University of Edinburgh Edinburgh EH9 3JR UK -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
Will do so. Its tough, but can be done. :P Thanks Stanley -----Original Message----- From: J.delasHeras@ed.ac.uk [mailto:J.delasHeras@ed.ac.uk] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 20:36 To: Stanley Ng Cc: bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [BioC] Help needed on limma and differentially expressed genes > Using Jenny's suggestion, I had similar idea that Wt0 samples were > unneccessary. But try to explain that to a biologist, is much tougher > as Wt0 is deemed the baseline. Contrary to some generalised opinion among statisticians, biologists are not really really dumb... so maybe you should really try to explain that to them. They may surprise you! :-) Jose -- Dr. Jose I. de las Heras Email: J.delasHeras at ed.ac.uk The Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology Phone: +44 (0)131 6513374 Institute for Cell & Molecular Biology Fax: +44 (0)131 6507360 Swann Building, Mayfield Road University of Edinburgh Edinburgh EH9 3JR UK -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 417 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6