new lumi and miRNA array data
1
0
Entering edit mode
@cei-abreu-goodger-4433
Last seen 9.7 years ago
Mexico
Hello Pan, et. al I'm having some problems with a script that used to work before I upgraded to BioCondcutr 2.2 (and thus lumi 1.6.0). Sorry I don't have an example for this, but maybe you can point me out in the right direction... I get stuck when trying to run lumiT, this is what it looks like: > raw <- lumiR(proFile, convertNuID=FALSE, inputAnnotation=FALSE) > raw Summary of BeadStudio output: Illumina Inc. BeadStudio version 3.2.6 Normalization = none Array Content = mouseMI_V1_R0.bgx.xml Error Model = none DateTime = 03/03/2008 16:39 Local Settings = en-GB Major Operation History: submitted finished 1 2008-05-05 19:41:48 2008-05-05 19:41:53 2 2008-05-05 19:41:53 2008-05-05 19:41:53 command lumiVersion 1 lumiR("Data/Sample_Gene_Profile.txt", inputAnnotation = FALSE) 1.6.0 2 lumiQ(x.lumi = x.lumi, detectionTh = detectionTh) 1.6.0 Object Information: LumiBatch (storageMode: lockedEnvironment) assayData: 386 features, 68 samples element names: beadNum, detection, exprs, se.exprs phenoData sampleNames: Brain 1 wt_(well=A1_MAFID=1), Brain 2 wt_(well=B1_MAFID=2), ..., Testes 3 KO_(well=H6_MAFID=48) (68 total) varLabels and varMetadata description: sampleID: The unique Illumina microarray Id featureData featureNames: mmu-let-7a, mmu-let-7b, ..., spike2-5240 (386 total) fvarLabels and fvarMetadata description: TargetID: The Illumina microarray identifier experimentData: use 'experimentData(object)' Annotation: Control Data: Available QC information: Please run summary(x, 'QC') for details! > lumiVst <- lumiT(raw, method="vst") 2008-05-05 19:36:37 , processing array 1 2008-05-05 19:36:37 , processing array 2 ... 2008-05-05 19:36:39 , processing array 67 2008-05-05 19:36:39 , processing array 68 There were 50 or more warnings (use warnings() to see the first 50) > warnings() Warning messages: 1: In lumiT(raw, method = "vst") ... : Too few probes are detectable based on detection p-values! Iteration method will be used for VST. 2: In log(u.bak) ... : NaNs produced ... ============== So, with lumi_1.4.0 I didn't get all these NaNs, now I do. Is this a feature? Any suggestions on how to deal with micro-RNA array data with the lumi package? Many thanks, Cei -- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.
Microarray Normalization lumi BRAIN Microarray Normalization lumi BRAIN • 1.2k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@wolfgang-huber-3550
Last seen 10 weeks ago
EMBL European Molecular Biology Laborat…
Dear Cei, I think it would be helpful for resolving this to make available to the lumi maintainers (and to this list) a reproducible example, including your (anonymized and/or reduced) dataset. Best wishes Wolfgang ------------------------------------------------------------------ Wolfgang Huber EBI/EMBL Cambridge UK http://www.ebi.ac.uk/huber Cei Abreu-Goodger a ?crit 05/05/2008 19:51: > > Hello Pan, et. al > > I'm having some problems with a script that used to work before I > upgraded to BioCondcutr 2.2 (and thus lumi 1.6.0). > > Sorry I don't have an example for this, but maybe you can point me out > in the right direction... > > I get stuck when trying to run lumiT, this is what it looks like: > >> raw <- lumiR(proFile, convertNuID=FALSE, inputAnnotation=FALSE) >> raw > Summary of BeadStudio output: > Illumina Inc. BeadStudio version 3.2.6 > Normalization = none > Array Content = mouseMI_V1_R0.bgx.xml > Error Model = none > DateTime = 03/03/2008 16:39 > Local Settings = en-GB > > Major Operation History: > submitted finished > 1 2008-05-05 19:41:48 2008-05-05 19:41:53 > 2 2008-05-05 19:41:53 2008-05-05 19:41:53 > command > lumiVersion > 1 lumiR("Data/Sample_Gene_Profile.txt", inputAnnotation = FALSE) 1.6.0 > 2 lumiQ(x.lumi = x.lumi, detectionTh = detectionTh) 1.6.0 > > Object Information: > LumiBatch (storageMode: lockedEnvironment) > assayData: 386 features, 68 samples > element names: beadNum, detection, exprs, se.exprs > phenoData > sampleNames: Brain 1 wt_(well=A1_MAFID=1), Brain 2 > wt_(well=B1_MAFID=2), ..., > Testes 3 KO_(well=H6_MAFID=48) (68 total) > varLabels and varMetadata description: > sampleID: The unique Illumina microarray Id > featureData > featureNames: mmu-let-7a, mmu-let-7b, ..., spike2-5240 (386 total) > fvarLabels and fvarMetadata description: > TargetID: The Illumina microarray identifier > experimentData: use 'experimentData(object)' > Annotation: > Control Data: Available > QC information: Please run summary(x, 'QC') for details! > > >> lumiVst <- lumiT(raw, method="vst") > 2008-05-05 19:36:37 , processing array 1 > 2008-05-05 19:36:37 , processing array 2 > ... > 2008-05-05 19:36:39 , processing array 67 > 2008-05-05 19:36:39 , processing array 68 > There were 50 or more warnings (use warnings() to see the first 50) > >> warnings() > Warning messages: > 1: In lumiT(raw, method = "vst") ... : > Too few probes are detectable based on detection p-values! > Iteration method will be used for VST. > 2: In log(u.bak) ... : NaNs produced > ... > > ============== > > So, with lumi_1.4.0 I didn't get all these NaNs, now I do. Is this a > feature? Any suggestions on how to deal with micro-RNA array data with > the lumi package? > > Many thanks, > > Cei > >
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 577 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6