affy won't load
4
0
Entering edit mode
jason smith ▴ 50
@jason-smith-2853
Last seen 10.3 years ago
Hi, First I'd like to thank everyone for bioconductor- it has been very useful. I have installed R 2.7.0 GUI 1.24 (5102) on an intel Mac running OS 10.5.3. R seems to be working and when I use biocLite to load packages I get a warning. Then when I try to load the packages everything seems to work except affy (and some related) packages. Here is what I get: > source("http://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R") > biocLite() Running biocinstall version 2.2.9 with R version 2.7.0 Your version of R requires version 2.2 of BioConductor. Will install the following packages: [1] "affy" "affydata" "affyPLM" "annaffy" "annotate" "Biobase" "Biostrings" "DynDoc" "gcrma" [10] "genefilter" "geneplotter" "hgu95av2.db" "limma" "marray" "matchprobes" "multtest" "ROC" "vsn" [19] "xtable" "affyQCReport" Please wait... Warning in install.packages(pkgs = pkgs, repos = repos, dependencies = dependencies, : argument 'lib' is missing: using '/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library' And later when I try to load affy: Error in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...) : unable to load shared library '/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so': dlopen(/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy. so, 6): Library not loaded: /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib Referenced from: /Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so Reason: image not found Error in library(affy) : .First.lib failed for 'affy' What can I do to fix this? Thanks, Jason
GUI affy GUI affy • 3.2k views
ADD COMMENT •
0
Entering edit mode
@steve-lianoglou-2771
Last seen 22 months ago
United States
Hi, On Jun 14, 2008, at 9:22 PM, jason smith wrote: <snip to="" problem=""> > Error in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...) : > unable to load shared library '/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/ > library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so': > dlopen(/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/ > affy.so, 6): Library not loaded: /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib > Referenced from: /Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/ > i386/affy.so > Reason: image not found > Error in library(affy) : .First.lib failed for 'affy' > > What can I do to fix this? I checked to see if I had that file and I did, so I wondered how the heck it got there. According to the tutorial below (and other hints from google), it seems to come from the installation of gettext, although I'm not sure where mine came from since I don't remember explicitly installing it. http://www.kenior.com/macintosh/adding-gettext-extension-for-mac- os-x-leopard You can follow along with that link (up to step 2), but probably your standard ./configure / make / make install dance should do just fine. You can get gettext here: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/gettext-0.17.tar.gz HTH, -steve
ADD COMMENT •
0
Entering edit mode
Thanks Steve, I checked, and the files (affy and related) are installed on my computer, however when I attempt to load them into R I get the error mentioned previously (reminder below): > > Error in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...) : > > unable to load shared library > '/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so': > > dlopen(/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/ > >affy.so, 6): Library not loaded: > /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib > > Referenced from:/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/ > > i386/affy.so > > Reason: image not found > > Error in library(affy) : .First.lib failed for'affy' > > I'm not sure what is happening - all of the files are in the correct folders on my hard drive, but for some reason library(affy) fails. Will installing/enabling gettext address this? Best Jason --- On Sat, 6/14/08, Steve Lianoglou <mailinglist.honeypot at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: > I checked to see if I had that file and I did, so I > wondered how the > heck it got there. > > According to the tutorial below (and other hints from > google), it > seems to come from the installation of gettext, although > I'm not sure > where mine came from since I don't remember explicitly > installing it. > > http://www.kenior.com/macintosh/adding-gettext-extension-for-mac- os-x-leopard > > You can follow along with that link (up to step 2), but > probably your > standard ./configure / make / make install dance should do > just fine. > > You can get gettext here: > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/gettext-0.17.tar.gz > > HTH, > -steve
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
This should not happen out of the box. Which R did you install (CRAN R or one from r.research.att.com or did you compile from scratch)? And what does options("pkgType") tell you (mac.binary I guess). Kasper On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:43 PM, jason smith wrote: > Thanks Steve, > > I checked, and the files (affy and related) are installed on my > computer, however when I attempt to load them into R I get the error > mentioned previously (reminder below): > >>> Error in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...) : >>> unable to load shared library >> '/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so': >>> dlopen(/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/ >>> affy.so, 6): Library not loaded: >> /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib >>> Referenced from:/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/ >>> i386/affy.so >>> Reason: image not found >>> Error in library(affy) : .First.lib failed for'affy' >>> > > I'm not sure what is happening - all of the files are in the correct > folders on my hard drive, but for some reason library(affy) fails. > Will installing/enabling gettext address this? > > Best > Jason > > > --- On Sat, 6/14/08, Steve Lianoglou > <mailinglist.honeypot at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: > >> I checked to see if I had that file and I did, so I >> wondered how the >> heck it got there. >> >> According to the tutorial below (and other hints from >> google), it >> seems to come from the installation of gettext, although >> I'm not sure >> where mine came from since I don't remember explicitly >> installing it. >> >> http://www.kenior.com/macintosh/adding-gettext-extension-for-mac- os-x-leopard >> >> You can follow along with that link (up to step 2), but >> probably your >> standard ./configure / make / make install dance should do >> just fine. >> >> You can get gettext here: >> ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/gettext-0.17.tar.gz >> >> HTH, >> -steve > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
for what it is worth , i ran into this problem with a student recently -- inexplicable change from day to day, affy loading well on one day and then generating this error on the next. this was macosx 10.5.3 and i simply don't know if some update was done in the mean time to solve it we took the following steps. 1) install Xcode tools 3.0 2) install darwinports; sudo port install gettext 3) biocLite("affy", type="source") i don't know if part 2 is necessary. but it did get affy loading and running on this system. --- Vince Carey, PhD Assoc. Prof Med (Biostatistics) Harvard Medical School Channing Laboratory - ph 6175252265 fa 6177311541 181 Longwood Ave Boston MA 02115 USA stvjc at channing.harvard.edu On Sun, 15 Jun 2008, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: > This should not happen out of the box. Which R did you install (CRAN R > or one from r.research.att.com or did you compile from scratch)? And > what does options("pkgType") tell you (mac.binary I guess). > > Kasper > > On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:43 PM, jason smith wrote: > > > Thanks Steve, > > > > I checked, and the files (affy and related) are installed on my > > computer, however when I attempt to load them into R I get the error > > mentioned previously (reminder below): > > > >>> Error in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...) : > >>> unable to load shared library > >> '/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so': > >>> dlopen(/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/ > >>> affy.so, 6): Library not loaded: > >> /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib > >>> Referenced from:/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/ > >>> i386/affy.so > >>> Reason: image not found > >>> Error in library(affy) : .First.lib failed for'affy' > >>> > > > > I'm not sure what is happening - all of the files are in the correct > > folders on my hard drive, but for some reason library(affy) fails. > > Will installing/enabling gettext address this? > > > > Best > > Jason > > > > > > --- On Sat, 6/14/08, Steve Lianoglou > > <mailinglist.honeypot at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: > > > >> I checked to see if I had that file and I did, so I > >> wondered how the > >> heck it got there. > >> > >> According to the tutorial below (and other hints from > >> google), it > >> seems to come from the installation of gettext, although > >> I'm not sure > >> where mine came from since I don't remember explicitly > >> installing it. > >> > >> http://www.kenior.com/macintosh/adding-gettext-extension-for-mac- os-x-leopard > >> > >> You can follow along with that link (up to step 2), but > >> probably your > >> standard ./configure / make / make install dance should do > >> just fine. > >> > >> You can get gettext here: > >> ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/gettext-0.17.tar.gz > >> > >> HTH, > >> -steve > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Bioconductor mailing list > > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > The information transmitted in this electronic communica...{{dropped:10}}
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
@kasper-daniel-hansen-2979
Last seen 18 months ago
United States
The warning you get does not really matter. I assume you are installing the binary version of R on a "standard" system, not something like iNquery. I am at a bit of a loss here. My version of affy does not link against that library, but I am on ppc. Could you try to do the following from Terminal # otool -L affy.so (where you have navigated to the folder where affy.so is, see your output). Have you installed the developer tools? And the stuff you get when you click "customize" during the R installation? Still, that should not be necessary. And could you please check (in R) what the pkgType option is set to? Kasper On Jun 15, 2008, at 5:56 PM, jason smith wrote: > Hi Kasper, > > I downloaded and installed the latest Mac binary (R 2.7.0.dmg) from > CRAN. Then I ran biocLite() followed by library(affy). I have pasted > part of my previous msg below. > > I have installed R 2.7.0 GUI 1.24 > (5102) on an intel MacBook running OS 10.5.3. R seems to be working > and when I use biocLite to install packages I get a > warning. Then when I try to load the packages everything seems to > work except affy (and some related) > packages. Here is what I get: > >> source("http://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R") >> biocLite() > Running biocinstall version 2.2.9 with R version 2.7.0 > Your version of R requires version 2.2 of BioConductor. > Will install the following packages: > [1] "affy" "affydata" "affyPLM" "annaffy" > "annotate" "Biobase" "Biostrings" "DynDoc" "gcrma" > [10] "genefilter" "geneplotter" "hgu95av2.db" "limma" > "marray" "matchprobes" "multtest" "ROC" "vsn" > [19] "xtable" "affyQCReport" > Please wait... > > Warning in install.packages(pkgs = pkgs, repos = repos, dependencies > = dependencies, : > argument 'lib' is missing: using '/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/ > library' > > And later when I try to load affy: > > Error in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...) : > unable to load shared library '/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/ > library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so': > dlopen(/Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/ > affy.so, 6): Library not > loaded: /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib > Referenced from: /Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/ > i386/affy.so > Reason: image not found > Error in library(affy) : .First.lib failed for 'affy' > > Thanks, > Jason > > > >
ADD COMMENT •
0
Entering edit mode
jason smith ▴ 50
@jason-smith-2853
Last seen 10.3 years ago
Kasper, Yes it is a standard system intel core 2 duo, MacBook 3,1; 2.2GHZ; 4GB RAM. xcode 3.0 installed. I did not install anything 'customized'. In R: > options("pkgType") $pkgType [1] "mac.binary" Here is the result of otool in terminal: jason-smiths-macbook:~ sjorges2002$ otool -L affy.so otool: can't open file: affy.so (No such file or directory) But I can navigate to this file: Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so affy.so is a 100KB Unix executable in i386 Vincent Carey said that they had to install Darwin ports, sudo ports, and gettext to fix this issue. However, since I am not a programmer/developer I don't have a C compiler or know how to use xcode to do this. Thanks Jason I am at a bit of a loss here. My version of affy does not link against that library, but I am on ppc. Could you try to do the following from Terminal # otool -L affy.so (where you have navigated to the folder where affy.so is, see your output). Have you installed the developer tools? And the stuff you get when you click "customize" during the R installation? Still, that should not be necessary. And could you please check (in R) what the pkgType option is set to?
ADD COMMENT •
0
Entering edit mode
> Kasper, > > Yes it is a standard system intel core 2 duo, MacBook 3,1; 2.2GHZ; 4GB > RAM. xcode 3.0 installed. I did not install anything 'customized'. In R: > >> options("pkgType") > $pkgType > [1] "mac.binary" > > Here is the result of otool in terminal: > jason-smiths-macbook:~ sjorges2002$ otool -L affy.so > otool: can't open file: affy.so (No such file or directory) > > But I can navigate to this file: > Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so > affy.so is a 100KB Unix executable in i386 Could you actually run otool -L on that file in your Library folder? > Vincent Carey said that they had to install Darwin ports, sudo ports, and > gettext to fix this issue. However, since I am not a programmer/developer > I don't have a C compiler or know how to use xcode to do this. Yeah, I saw Vince email. It looks really strange I must say, especially him noting that the problem suddenly appeared. You should not have to install gettext at all and certainly not from Darwinports. I am very bewildered by this. Try to run the otool command. We might have to look into the building process for macs. Kasper > Thanks > Jason > > I am at a bit of a loss here. My version of affy does not link against > that library, but I am on ppc. Could you try to do the following from > Terminal > # otool -L affy.so > (where you have navigated to the folder where affy.so is, see your > output). Have you installed the developer tools? And the stuff you get > when you click "customize" during the R installation? Still, that > should not be necessary. And could you please check (in R) what the > pkgType option is set to? > > > >
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
jason smith ▴ 50
@jason-smith-2853
Last seen 10.3 years ago
Kasper, Here is what I get when I run otool. I'm not sure if I am doing it right. jason-smiths-macbook:~ sjorges2002$ otool -L "affy.so" otool: can't open file: affy.so (No such file or directory) Thanks, Jason
ADD COMMENT •
0
Entering edit mode
Hi, On Jun 16, 2008, at 8:14 AM, jason smith wrote: > Kasper, > > Here is what I get when I run otool. I'm not sure if I am doing it > right. > > jason-smiths-macbook:~ sjorges2002$ otool -L "affy.so" > otool: can't open file: affy.so (No such file or directory) You're not doing it right :-) You have to point to the actual affy.so file. From your previous errors, it looks like you should run this from the command line: otool -L /Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so Let's see what you get from that. -steve
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
Thanks Steve, Here is what I get from otool: jason-smiths-macbook:~ sjorges2002$ otool -L /Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so /Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so: affy.so (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) /usr/lib/libz.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.2.3) /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/lib/libR.dylib (compatibility version 2.7.0, current version 2.7.0) /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib (compatibility version 8.0.0, current version 8.3.0) /usr/lib/libiconv.2.dylib (compatibility version 5.0.0, current version 5.0.0) /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 88.3.10) /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A /CoreFoundation (compatibility version 150.0.0, current version 368.35.0) /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.0.0) Best Jason --- On Mon, 6/16/08, Steve Lianoglou <mailinglist.honeypot at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: > > You're not doing it right :-) > > otool -L > /Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so > > Let's see what you get from that. > > -steve
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
Ok, I will take this over to the R-SIG-Mac list and cc Herve who is the build manager of Bioconductor. I suspect that something is wrong with the Bioconductor builds. Synopsis: Jason is running R-2.7.0 from CRAN on an Intel macbook running 10.5.3. He says he has Xcode 3.0 installed. He tries to install the binary version of aff from Bioconductor using the normal biocLite("affy") However, even though the tarball downloads and gets installed, the package won't load. It complains that it needs the library /usr/local/ lib/libintl.3.dylib (and an otool -L really confirms this), but apparently this files does not exists. I am a bit surprised that the binary version links to something in /usr/local. I have this file on my PPC G4 running 10.5.3. As I see it, this should work out of the box with the system Jason is running. Does anyone have any good ideas? My hunch is that something might be up with the binary builds? Vince Carey reports that a student of his had a similar problem. Kasper On Jun 16, 2008, at 6:53 AM, jason smith wrote: > Thanks Steve, > > Here is what I get from otool: > > jason-smiths-macbook:~ sjorges2002$ otool -L /Users/sjorges2002/ > Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so > /Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so: > affy.so (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) > /usr/lib/libz.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version > 1.2.3) > /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/lib/ > libR.dylib (compatibility version 2.7.0, current version 2.7.0) > /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib (compatibility version 8.0.0, current > version 8.3.0) > /usr/lib/libiconv.2.dylib (compatibility version 5.0.0, current > version 5.0.0) > /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current > version 88.3.10) > /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/ > CoreFoundation (compatibility version 150.0.0, current version > 368.35.0) > /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, > current version 1.0.0) > > Best > Jason > > --- On Mon, 6/16/08, Steve Lianoglou > <mailinglist.honeypot at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: > > >> >> You're not doing it right :-) > >> >> otool -L >> /Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so >> >> Let's see what you get from that. >> >> -steve > > >
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
Hi, On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: > Ok, I will take this over to the R-SIG-Mac list and cc Herve who is > the build manager of Bioconductor. I suspect that something is wrong > with the Bioconductor builds. > > Synopsis: Jason is running R-2.7.0 from CRAN on an Intel macbook > running 10.5.3. He says he has Xcode 3.0 installed. He tries to > install the binary version of aff from Bioconductor using the normal > biocLite("affy") > However, even though the tarball downloads and gets installed, the > package won't load. It complains that it needs the library /usr/ > local/lib/libintl.3.dylib (and an otool -L really confirms this), > but apparently this files does not exists. I am a bit surprised that > the binary version links to something in /usr/local. I have this > file on my PPC G4 running 10.5.3. As I see it, this should work out > of the box with the system Jason is running. Does anyone have any > good ideas? My hunch is that something might be up with the binary > builds? Just so Jason can get up and running quickly (and not have to wait for this to get sorted out in the builds or whatever), I would recommend as a band-aid procedure to just install gettext for now, as I am fairly certain that this will provide the /usr/local/lib/libintl. 3.dylib that he is missing. I gather that he might not be very comfortable from the command line, so following these steps in a terminal session should do the trick: cd /tmp curl http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/gnu/gettext/gettext-0.17.tar.gz | tar xz cd gettext-0.17 ./configure make sudo make install HTH, -steve -- Steve Lianoglou Graduate Student: Physiology, Biophysics, and Systems Biology Weill Medical College, Cornell University http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
Another way Jason can get up and run quickly is to do something like R> options(pkgType = "source") and then do biocLite. That is probably a better solution than trying to install gettext Kasper On Jun 19, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Steve Lianoglou wrote: > Hi, > > On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: > >> Ok, I will take this over to the R-SIG-Mac list and cc Herve who is >> the build manager of Bioconductor. I suspect that something is >> wrong with the Bioconductor builds. >> >> Synopsis: Jason is running R-2.7.0 from CRAN on an Intel macbook >> running 10.5.3. He says he has Xcode 3.0 installed. He tries to >> install the binary version of aff from Bioconductor using the normal >> biocLite("affy") >> However, even though the tarball downloads and gets installed, the >> package won't load. It complains that it needs the library /usr/ >> local/lib/libintl.3.dylib (and an otool -L really confirms this), >> but apparently this files does not exists. I am a bit surprised >> that the binary version links to something in /usr/local. I have >> this file on my PPC G4 running 10.5.3. As I see it, this should >> work out of the box with the system Jason is running. Does anyone >> have any good ideas? My hunch is that something might be up with >> the binary builds? > > Just so Jason can get up and running quickly (and not have to wait > for this to get sorted out in the builds or whatever), I would > recommend as a band-aid procedure to just install gettext for now, > as I am fairly certain that this will provide the /usr/local/lib/ > libintl.3.dylib that he is missing. > > I gather that he might not be very comfortable from the command > line, so following these steps in a terminal session should do the > trick: > > cd /tmp > curl http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/gnu/gettext/gettext-0.17.tar.gz | > tar xz > cd gettext-0.17 > ./configure > make > sudo make install > > HTH, > -steve > > -- > Steve Lianoglou > Graduate Student: Physiology, Biophysics, and Systems Biology > Weill Medical College, Cornell University > > http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
On Jun 19, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: > Another way Jason can get up and run quickly is to do something like > > R> options(pkgType = "source") > > and then do biocLite. That is probably a better solution than trying > to install gettext > Definitely, and especially since it doesn't help (see my comments to Steve below). I wouldn't recommend installing gettext (unless you know what you're doing) simply because it will modify your system such that all future configurations will detect it and behave differently. As long as you don't plan to copy anything to another machine it is not a big deal, but if you do, you'll learn very quickly why that's a bad idea ;). Nonetheless, there are valid cases. However, as Jan pointed out correctly, this is not the only problem that BioC builds have, unfortunately. I can only repeat my plea that I sent while ago to the BioC team to fix their Mac builds. > Kasper > > On Jun 19, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Steve Lianoglou wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: >> >>> Ok, I will take this over to the R-SIG-Mac list and cc Herve who >>> is the build manager of Bioconductor. I suspect that something is >>> wrong with the Bioconductor builds. >>> >>> Synopsis: Jason is running R-2.7.0 from CRAN on an Intel macbook >>> running 10.5.3. He says he has Xcode 3.0 installed. He tries to >>> install the binary version of aff from Bioconductor using the normal >>> biocLite("affy") >>> However, even though the tarball downloads and gets installed, the >>> package won't load. It complains that it needs the library /usr/ >>> local/lib/libintl.3.dylib (and an otool -L really confirms this), >>> but apparently this files does not exists. I am a bit surprised >>> that the binary version links to something in /usr/local. I have >>> this file on my PPC G4 running 10.5.3. As I see it, this should >>> work out of the box with the system Jason is running. Does anyone >>> have any good ideas? My hunch is that something might be up with >>> the binary builds? >> >> Just so Jason can get up and running quickly (and not have to wait >> for this to get sorted out in the builds or whatever), I would >> recommend as a band-aid procedure to just install gettext for now, >> as I am fairly certain that this will provide the /usr/local/lib/ >> libintl.3.dylib that he is missing. >> Are you? Did you actually test it? I'm pretty sure that you're wrong, because the commands below compile libintl.8.dylib(!) and thus won't help (that one is fine and part of your Gtk binary). I'm still puzzled at where the BioC team gets libintl.3 ... Cheers, Simon >> I gather that he might not be very comfortable from the command >> line, so following these steps in a terminal session should do the >> trick: >> >> cd /tmp >> curl http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/gnu/gettext/gettext-0.17.tar.gz | >> tar xz >> cd gettext-0.17 >> ./configure >> make >> sudo make install >> >> HTH, >> -steve >> >> -- >> Steve Lianoglou >> Graduate Student: Physiology, Biophysics, and Systems Biology >> Weill Medical College, Cornell University >> >> http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos > > _______________________________________________ > R-SIG-Mac mailing list > R-SIG-Mac at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac > >
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
On Jun 19, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote: > Are you? Did you actually test it? I'm pretty sure that you're > wrong, because the commands below compile libintl.8.dylib(!) and > thus won't help (that one is fine and part of your Gtk binary). I'm > still puzzled at where the BioC team gets libintl.3 ... Well, I have libintl.3 on my Leopard G4 powerbook. It is a fairly recent install and I am pretty sure I have not installed gettext manually - but I could be wrong of course. Neither am I running Darwin ports or Fink. Kasper
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
> Are you? Did you actually test it? I'm pretty sure that you're > wrong, because the commands below compile libintl.8.dylib(!) and > thus won't help (that one is fine and part of your Gtk binary). Ouch, well I stand corrected then. Sorry for sending out misinformation ... > I'm still puzzled at where the BioC team gets libintl.3 ... Yeah. Even more puzzling (to me) is where mine came from ... as someone else mentioned before, I also have a fairly clean install of leopard (having just replaced my hard drive a few weeks ago) and libnitl.3.dylib is magically there. My apologies once again. -steve
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
Thanks to all for bringing this issue of the BioC 2.2 Max OS X binary packages to light, and I apologize for any inconvenience these non-standard binary packages have caused the BioC user community. If all goes well with the build system tomorrow morning, the Mac OS X binary packages will be produced under the standard Mac OS X R framework. I will send out an e-mail tomorrow morning notifying you on its status. I don't want to get too much into the gory details of the build system, but I will provide you with a high level synopsis on what caused the breakdown. Back when the Bioconductor core team released BioC 2.2 in May, we had a last minute scramble for the Mac OS X binary packages builds. Up until release time, we were building the packages on Mac OS X Leopard (10.5.2). It was brought to our attention the week of the release that those builds were not working on Mac OS X Tiger. When we switched to a Tiger build machine, we experienced problems with the png device (type = "quartz", the default, failed to work in our build environment). In order to be expedient we used a custom build of R 2.7.0 to get around this issue. This had the unintended consequence that you discovered. We have since reverted back to using the standard R 2.7.1 build for the Mac and are using a configuration file to set options(bitmapType = "cairo") to get around the png device issue. These new Mac binary package builds will be linking into the dynamic libraries located in the standard R directory /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources/lib. Cheers, Patrick Simon Urbanek wrote: > > On Jun 19, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: > >> Another way Jason can get up and run quickly is to do something like >> >> R> options(pkgType = "source") >> >> and then do biocLite. That is probably a better solution than trying >> to install gettext >> > > Definitely, and especially since it doesn't help (see my comments to > Steve below). > > I wouldn't recommend installing gettext (unless you know what you're > doing) simply because it will modify your system such that all future > configurations will detect it and behave differently. As long as you > don't plan to copy anything to another machine it is not a big deal, > but if you do, you'll learn very quickly why that's a bad idea ;). > Nonetheless, there are valid cases. > > However, as Jan pointed out correctly, this is not the only problem > that BioC builds have, unfortunately. I can only repeat my plea that I > sent while ago to the BioC team to fix their Mac builds. > > >> Kasper >> >> On Jun 19, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Steve Lianoglou wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: >>> >>>> Ok, I will take this over to the R-SIG-Mac list and cc Herve who is >>>> the build manager of Bioconductor. I suspect that something is >>>> wrong with the Bioconductor builds. >>>> >>>> Synopsis: Jason is running R-2.7.0 from CRAN on an Intel macbook >>>> running 10.5.3. He says he has Xcode 3.0 installed. He tries to >>>> install the binary version of aff from Bioconductor using the normal >>>> biocLite("affy") >>>> However, even though the tarball downloads and gets installed, the >>>> package won't load. It complains that it needs the library >>>> /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib (and an otool -L really confirms >>>> this), but apparently this files does not exists. I am a bit >>>> surprised that the binary version links to something in /usr/local. >>>> I have this file on my PPC G4 running 10.5.3. As I see it, this >>>> should work out of the box with the system Jason is running. Does >>>> anyone have any good ideas? My hunch is that something might be up >>>> with the binary builds? >>> >>> Just so Jason can get up and running quickly (and not have to wait >>> for this to get sorted out in the builds or whatever), I would >>> recommend as a band-aid procedure to just install gettext for now, >>> as I am fairly certain that this will provide the >>> /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib that he is missing. >>> > > Are you? Did you actually test it? I'm pretty sure that you're wrong, > because the commands below compile libintl.8.dylib(!) and thus won't > help (that one is fine and part of your Gtk binary). I'm still puzzled > at where the BioC team gets libintl.3 ... > > Cheers, > Simon > > >>> I gather that he might not be very comfortable from the command >>> line, so following these steps in a terminal session should do the >>> trick: >>> >>> cd /tmp >>> curl http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/gnu/gettext/gettext-0.17.tar.gz | >>> tar xz >>> cd gettext-0.17 >>> ./configure >>> make >>> sudo make install >>> >>> HTH, >>> -steve >>> >>> -- >>> Steve Lianoglou >>> Graduate Student: Physiology, Biophysics, and Systems Biology >>> Weill Medical College, Cornell University >>> >>> http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos >> >> _______________________________________________ >> R-SIG-Mac mailing list >> R-SIG-Mac at stat.math.ethz.ch >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > R-SIG-Mac mailing list > R-SIG-Mac at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
Last night's BioC 2.2 Mac OS X binary packages went well and will soon be available on bioconductor.org. These packages make use of the dynamic libraries (libgcc_s.1.dylib, libgfortran.2.dylib, libreadline.5.2.dylib, and libreadline.dylib) that are distributed with the standard Mac OS X build of R 2.7.x. The new packages have been pushed to the web server behind bioconductor.org, but due to the file caching by the web server, the more popular packages are pulled from the cache rather than the new package set. It can sometimes take a few hours for the cache to be cleared and for the complete set of Mac OS X binary packages to be available. Here is a look at how the affy and affyio packages are now linking to external libraries: [Examination of affy] pitt:~/test biocbuild$ otool -L affy/libs/i386/affy.so affy/libs/i386/affy.so: affy.so (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) /usr/lib/libz.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.2.3) /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/lib/libR.dylib (compatibility version 2.7.0, current version 2.7.1) /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFou ndation (compatibility version 150.0.0, current version 368.27.0) /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/lib/libgcc_s.1. dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.0.0) /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 88.3.3) [Examination of affyio] pitt:~/test biocbuild$ otool -L affyio/libs/i386/affyio.so affyio/libs/i386/affyio.so: affyio.so (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 88.3.3) /usr/lib/libz.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.2.3) /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/lib/libR.dylib (compatibility version 2.7.0, current version 2.7.1) /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFou ndation (compatibility version 150.0.0, current version 368.27.0) /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/lib/libgcc_s.1. dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.0.0) If you experience any other related issues along these lines, please feel free to e-mail me directly. Cheers, Patrick Patrick Aboyoun wrote: > Thanks to all for bringing this issue of the BioC 2.2 Max OS X binary > packages to light, and I apologize for any inconvenience these > non-standard binary packages have caused the BioC user community. If > all goes well with the build system tomorrow morning, the Mac OS X > binary packages will be produced under the standard Mac OS X R > framework. I will send out an e-mail tomorrow morning notifying you on > its status. > > I don't want to get too much into the gory details of the build > system, but I will provide you with a high level synopsis on what > caused the breakdown. Back when the Bioconductor core team released > BioC 2.2 in May, we had a last minute scramble for the Mac OS X binary > packages builds. Up until release time, we were building the packages > on Mac OS X Leopard (10.5.2). It was brought to our attention the week > of the release that those builds were not working on Mac OS X Tiger. > When we switched to a Tiger build machine, we experienced problems > with the png device (type = "quartz", the default, failed to work in > our build environment). In order to be expedient we used a custom > build of R 2.7.0 to get around this issue. This had the unintended > consequence that you discovered. We have since reverted back to using > the standard R 2.7.1 build for the Mac and are using a configuration > file to set options(bitmapType = "cairo") to get around the png device > issue. These new Mac binary package builds will be linking into the > dynamic libraries located in the standard R directory > /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources/lib. > > > Cheers, > Patrick [Removed e-mail trail]
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: > Ok, I will take this over to the R-SIG-Mac list and cc Herve who is > the build manager of Bioconductor. I suspect that something is wrong > with the Bioconductor builds. > > Synopsis: Jason is running R-2.7.0 from CRAN on an Intel macbook > running 10.5.3. He says he has Xcode 3.0 installed. He tries to > install the binary version of aff from Bioconductor using the normal > biocLite("affy") > However, even though the tarball downloads and gets installed, the > package won't load. It complains that it needs the library /usr/ > local/lib/libintl.3.dylib (and an otool -L really confirms this), > but apparently this files does not exists. I am a bit surprised that > the binary version links to something in /usr/local. I have this > file on my PPC G4 running 10.5.3. As I see it, this should work out > of the box with the system Jason is running. Does anyone have any > good ideas? My hunch is that something might be up with the binary > builds? > Yes, that sounds like a problem with the BioC builds (libintl.3.dylib is really strange - we use libintl.8.dylib as a part of optional Gtk on CRAN, but never libintl3.dylib..). I didn't test BioC builds ever since we stopped building it on CRAN, but I have heard complains about their binaries linking various stuff from /usr/local, so I'd suggest to file a bug report with them (BTW: Xcode should not be required from binary installs). Cheers, S > Vince Carey reports that a student of his had a similar problem. > > Kasper > > On Jun 16, 2008, at 6:53 AM, jason smith wrote: > >> Thanks Steve, >> >> Here is what I get from otool: >> >> jason-smiths-macbook:~ sjorges2002$ otool -L /Users/sjorges2002/ >> Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so >> /Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so: >> affy.so (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) >> /usr/lib/libz.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version >> 1.2.3) >> /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/lib/ >> libR.dylib (compatibility version 2.7.0, current version 2.7.0) >> /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib (compatibility version 8.0.0, >> current version 8.3.0) >> /usr/lib/libiconv.2.dylib (compatibility version 5.0.0, current >> version 5.0.0) >> /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current >> version 88.3.10) >> /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/ >> CoreFoundation (compatibility version 150.0.0, current version >> 368.35.0) >> /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, >> current version 1.0.0) >> >> Best >> Jason >> >> --- On Mon, 6/16/08, Steve Lianoglou >> <mailinglist.honeypot at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> You're not doing it right :-) >> >>> >>> otool -L >>> /Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so >>> >>> Let's see what you get from that. >>> >>> -steve >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > R-SIG-Mac mailing list > R-SIG-Mac at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac > >
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
Yeah you want to run it on the affy.so file in your library folder. This is what you need to type otool -L /Users/sjorges2002/Library/R/2.7/library/affy/libs/i386/affy.so Kasper On Jun 16, 2008, at 5:14 AM, jason smith wrote: > Kasper, > > Here is what I get when I run otool. I'm not sure if I am doing it > right. > > jason-smiths-macbook:~ sjorges2002$ otool -L "affy.so" > otool: can't open file: affy.so (No such file or directory) > > Thanks, > Jason > > >
ADD REPLY •

Login before adding your answer.

Similar Posts
Loading Similar Posts
Traffic: 702 users visited in the last hour
Content Search
Users
Tags
Badges
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6