GEO and nuId probes
1
0
Entering edit mode
@cei-abreu-goodger-4433
Last seen 9.2 years ago
Mexico
Hello Pan, et al, I've been discussing the possibility with some collegues of uploading to GEO some of our Illumina array data using nuID probes as the main identifier. Is this a bad idea? Is anyone planning on doing something similar in the near future? I haven't previously submitted to GEO, but I guess one doesn't want to end up creating a new "platform" for every new annotation... Is there a plan to have "bioconductor" specific platforms in GEO? Thanks, Cei
Annotation Annotation • 683 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@sean-davis-490
Last seen 4 months ago
United States
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Cei Abreu-Goodger <cei@ebi.ac.uk> wrote: > > Hello Pan, et al, > > I've been discussing the possibility with some collegues of uploading to > GEO some of our Illumina array data using nuID probes as the main > identifier. > > Is this a bad idea? > > Is anyone planning on doing something similar in the near future? I haven't > previously submitted to GEO, but I guess one doesn't want to end up creating > a new "platform" for every new annotation... Is there a plan to have > "bioconductor" specific platforms in GEO? > There is no plan to have bioconductor-specific platforms in GEO. If you do not want to create a new platform, then you have no choice but to use the ones that are already in GEO; I doubt that any use nuID. That said, I do not think that uploading to GEO using nuID is a bad idea, as nuID has a lot of nice characteristics. Sean [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 487 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6