Confusing results
1
0
Entering edit mode
@hemant-ritturaj-3016
Last seen 9.7 years ago
Dear all, I have been analysing the microarray data for three or more experimental condition I have noted a very serious problem in analysis performed in the analysis. the problem observed is as follows: I had three experimental condition each with control and experimental condition, having two replicates each T1 - control (2 replicates) - experiment (2 replicates) T2- control (2 replicates) - experiment (2 replicates) T3-control (2 replicates) - experiment (2 replicates) When analysis was perfomed for T1, T2 and T3 seperatly such as Name FileName Target T1_c1 T1c1.CEL T1c T1_c2 T1c2.CEL T1c T1_s1 T2c3.CEL T1s T1_s2 T2c5.CEL T1s I have got a list of differetially expressed genes respectively for three sets. But when analysis was performed together that from a single Target file Name FileName Target T1_c1 T1c1.CEL T1c T1_c2 T1c2.CEL T1c T1_s1 T2c3.CEL T1s T1_s2 T2c5.CEL T1s T2_c1 T3c6.CEL T2c T2_c2 T3c7.CEL T2c T2_s1 T4c8.CEL T2s T2_s2 T4c9.CEL T2s T3_c1 T5c1.CEL T3c T3_c2 T5c2.CEL T3c T3_s1 T6c1.CEL T3s T3_s2 T6c2.CEL T3s and analysed the differetially expressed gene for T1, T2 and T3 I get totally different results from the results obtained by analysing them seperatly. I want to know that whether the expression is averaged over all the chips therfore giving inconsistent result .between the two methods I want to know whether this incosistency is problem with bioconductor or I have understood some of the basic analysis part such as design matrix in certain wrong way. I shall be very thankful for anyone who will help me in understanding the basic concept of analysing microarray data. -- Hemant Ritturaj Kushwaha [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Microarray Microarray • 690 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Jenny Drnevich ★ 2.0k
@jenny-drnevich-2812
Last seen 28 days ago
United States
Hi Hemant, The question was just asked and answered a couple of days ago: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/2009-February/026349.html Jenny At 12:11 PM 2/18/2009, hemant ritturaj wrote: >Dear all, > >I have been analysing the microarray data for three or more experimental >condition > >I have noted a very serious problem in analysis performed in the analysis. >the problem observed is as follows: > >I had three experimental condition each with control and experimental >condition, having two replicates each > >T1 - control (2 replicates) - experiment (2 replicates) >T2- control (2 replicates) - experiment (2 replicates) >T3-control (2 replicates) - experiment (2 replicates) > >When analysis was perfomed for T1, T2 and T3 seperatly such as >Name FileName Target >T1_c1 T1c1.CEL T1c >T1_c2 T1c2.CEL T1c >T1_s1 T2c3.CEL T1s >T1_s2 T2c5.CEL T1s > > >I have got a list of differetially expressed genes respectively for three >sets. > >But when analysis was performed together that from a single Target file > >Name FileName Target >T1_c1 T1c1.CEL T1c >T1_c2 T1c2.CEL T1c >T1_s1 T2c3.CEL T1s >T1_s2 T2c5.CEL T1s >T2_c1 T3c6.CEL T2c >T2_c2 T3c7.CEL T2c >T2_s1 T4c8.CEL T2s >T2_s2 T4c9.CEL T2s >T3_c1 T5c1.CEL T3c >T3_c2 T5c2.CEL T3c >T3_s1 T6c1.CEL T3s >T3_s2 T6c2.CEL T3s > > and analysed the differetially expressed gene for T1, T2 and T3 I get >totally different results from the results obtained by analysing them >seperatly. > >I want to know that whether the expression is averaged over all the chips >therfore giving inconsistent result .between the two methods > >I want to know whether this incosistency is problem with bioconductor or I >have understood some of the basic analysis part such as design matrix in >certain wrong way. > >I shall be very thankful for anyone who will help me in understanding the >basic concept of analysing microarray data. > >-- >Hemant Ritturaj Kushwaha > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > >_______________________________________________ >Bioconductor mailing list >Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >Search the archives: >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor Jenny Drnevich, Ph.D. Functional Genomics Bioinformatics Specialist W.M. Keck Center for Comparative and Functional Genomics Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign 330 ERML 1201 W. Gregory Dr. Urbana, IL 61801 USA ph: 217-244-7355 fax: 217-265-5066 e-mail: drnevich at illinois.edu
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 645 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6