limma: analyzing randomized duplicate spots on Nimblegen array
0
0
Entering edit mode
Jenny Drnevich ★ 2.0k
@jenny-drnevich-2812
Last seen 9 days ago
United States
HI Vishal, I only briefly glanced through your code, but here's one problem (quoted from my response to a similar question on the list just last week): >Did you read through the help file for duplicateCorrelation? You >can't do both block and ndups: > >"At this time it is not possible to estimate correlations between >duplicate spots and between technical replicates simultaneously. If >block is not null, then the function will set ndups=1." HTH, Jenny At 09:11 AM 4/30/2009, Vishal Thapar wrote: >Dear List, > >Hi! I am new to this list so here is a brief introduction: My name is Vishal >and I am a post doc at Cold Spring Harbor Lab working on Chip-chip / seq >data analysis. I have my background in computer algorithms so pardon me if I >make some errors with my Biological and Statistical terminology. > >Here is the problem that I am facing: > >1) I have data from Nimblegen tiling arrays. I have 3 Bioreps each having 1 >technical rep. There are no dye swaps. In each rep, there are duplicate >spots on the array. In this experiment, as I reconstructed the images from >the data, I see some "quite" bad spots in the red channel specially for >biorep2. I am sure most of you have faced this so do you usually include >this rep in your analysis, or not? How do you handle the statistical >confidence with your results if you do or dont? > >2) I want to use the duplicate spots on each rep for my analysis. As of now, >I do the normalization, I average the duplicate spots and use that as my >input to the lmfit() function. I notice that after the average, the >correlation between the reps is better. I guess that is expected but I am >not satisfied with the averaging of the Spots. I believe that there is a >better way to do this than just take the average but I am just not aware of >that. I have used the duplicateCorrelation() function in Limma which gives >me a -0.04 correlation and its probably because the probes are position >randomized (even the duplicates are). So can anyone help me and tell me how >should I proceed and use these duplicate spots in a better way than just >simply averaging them? I appreciate any pointers that I can get. > > >Source code for this: > >ma.loess<-normalizeWithinArrays(rg,method="loess", bc.method="none") > >ma.quantile <-normalizeBetweenArrays(ma.loess, method="quantile") > >ma.spot1.quantile<-ma.quantile[grep("SPOT1",ma.quantile$genes$GENE_EX PR_OPTION),] > > >ma.spot2.quantile<-ma.quantile[grep("SPOT2",ma.quantile$genes$GENE_EX PR_OPTION),] > > >ma.spot1.quantile<-ma.spot1.quantile[order(ma.spot1.quantile$genes$GE NE_EXPR_OPTION,ma.spot1.quantile$genes$POSITION),] > > >ma.quantile <- ma.quantile[order(ma.quantile$genes$GENE_EXPR_OPTION, >ma.quantile$genes$POSITION),] > >ma.spot2.quantile<-ma.spot2.quantile[order(ma.spot2.quantile$genes$GE NE_EXPR_OPTION,ma.spot2.quantile$genes$POSITION),] > > >ma.avr.quantile<-ma.spot1.quantile >ma.avr.quantile$M<-(ma.spot1.quantile$M + ma.spot2.quantile$M)/2 > >fit.avg <- lmFit(ma.avr.quantile, design) >fit <- lmFit(ma.quantile, design) > >-------------------------------- >function: duplicateCorrelation() in limma as follows: > >biolrep=c(1,1,2,2) >corfit.avr=duplicateCorrelation(ma.avr.quantile, ndups=2, block=biolrep) >-------------------------------- > >This did not work. I got a negative corelation of -0.04 > >I appreciate your time and help . > >Sincerely, > >Vishal > >ps: Thank you Gordan Smith for writing Limma. I think its really a great >tool to have and I am very appreciative of it. > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > >_______________________________________________ >Bioconductor mailing list >Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >Search the archives: >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor Jenny Drnevich, Ph.D. Functional Genomics Bioinformatics Specialist W.M. Keck Center for Comparative and Functional Genomics Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign 330 ERML 1201 W. Gregory Dr. Urbana, IL 61801 USA ph: 217-244-7355 fax: 217-265-5066 e-mail: drnevich at illinois.edu
Normalization limma Normalization limma • 776 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 387 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6