Question: Subject: Re: Normalization of arrays where most of the genes change
0
gravatar for Alicia Oshlack
10.4 years ago by
Alicia Oshlack70 wrote:
Hi Yiwen, In cases where you know the subset of genes that are not changin you can use limma as outlined in: http://genomebiology.com/2007/8/1/R2 Cheers, Alicia Message-ID: <c2a9eb528d6c3d44ad457c54ad0c7cd545a85c49 at="" nihmlbx01.nih.gov=""> Sean, Thanks for getting back to me so quickly! I took a look at the VSN package and some threads in the mailing archive, it looks like the right tool to try. However, I am just wondering, if there are people fitting LOESS on a subset of unchanged genes and any comment on that. Thanks in advance! Yiwen From: Davis, Sean (NCI) Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 9:01 AM To: He, Yiwen (NIH/CIT) [C] Cc: bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [BioC] Normalization of arrays where most of the genes change On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:54 AM, He, Yiwen (NIH/CIT) [C] <heyiwen at="" mail.nih.gov<mailto:heyiwen="" at="" mail.nih.gov="">> wrote: Hi, We have some arrays where most of the genes are turned on under certain conditions. This violates the assumption that most normalization methods make. What would be the best way to handle such arrays? We are using Agilent arrays but as I understand the platform should not matter. I'm wondering, if LOESS or Quntile normalization can be used on a (small) subset of invariable genes and expand to the whole array? If so, is there such a tool in BioC? Thank you very much! Hi, Yiwen. There has been some discussion on the list before (you might check the archives), but vsn might be a reasonable place to start. Sean [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
normalization vsn limma • 386 views
ADD COMMENTlink written 10.4 years ago by Alicia Oshlack70
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 16.09
Traffic: 118 users visited in the last hour