Hi all, I'm wondernig about what is the more relevant package among limma and Beadarray to analyse data from Illumina beadchip microarrays? Thank you for any feedback Leon [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi Leon, Leo Nitsche wrote: > Hi all, > > > I'm wondernig about what is the more relevant package among limma and > Beadarray to analyse data from Illumina beadchip microarrays? The two packages do different things; beadarray is for preprocessing the raw data and limma is for fitting linear models and detecting differentially expressed genes. So both are relevant, just at different stages of the game. Best, Jim > > Thank you for any feedback > Leon > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor -- James W. MacDonald, M.S. Biostatistician Douglas Lab University of Michigan Department of Human Genetics 5912 Buhl 1241 E. Catherine St. Ann Arbor MI 48109-5618 734-615-7826

Hi Leo, beadarray & lumi packages are specifically designed to work with Illumina data Mohamed Leo Nitsche a ?crit : > Hi all, > > > I'm wondernig about what is the more relevant package among limma and > Beadarray to analyse data from Illumina beadchip microarrays? > > Thank you for any feedback > Leon > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > > -- Mohamed Lajnef INSERM Unit? 955. 40 rue de Mesly. 94000 Cr?teil. Courriel : Mohamed.lajnef at inserm.fr tel. : 01 49 81 31 31 (poste 18470) Sec : 01 49 81 32 90 fax : 01 49 81 30 99