Question: question about ontoCompare() performance change
0
gravatar for Oana VIGY
9.8 years ago by
Oana VIGY80
Oana VIGY80 wrote:
Dear All, I notice the same problem of time-consuming. Hopping the problem will be resolved soon. Best regards, Oana Jean-Pierre Desvignes a ?crit : > Hello, > > I have the same problem as Scott. When I compared 2 lists of go term (1000 > values for the first list and 4000 for the second list) with the version 1.10 of > gotools, the time to make the process was ~10min. Now I must wait several hours > to compare the same list. I often stop the process before the end. > I try to modify the format of the list that I set in entry, but the result is > the same. I also make the same analysis that was given in example in the > documentation and the time of the process is ~ 1h30 instead of 5min. > While waiting for a solution. > > Thanks > > Jean-Pierre > > PS: Sorry for my english. > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Oana VIGY* Institut de G?nomique Fonctionnelle UMR 5203 - U661 - CNRS INSERM UM1 UM2 141 rue de la Cardonille 34 094 MONTPELLIER Cedex 5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Tel: +33 (0)4 67 14 29 40 oana.vigy at igf.cnrs.fr <mailto:oana.vigy at="" igf.cnrs.fr=""> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -- Passerelle antivirus IGF --
go process gotools • 278 views
ADD COMMENTlink written 9.8 years ago by Oana VIGY80
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 16.09
Traffic: 155 users visited in the last hour