Thanks for your comments. Being new to the field I was interested in looking for 'good practice' - obviously, working in R the cellHTS reports are the easiest way to go On Aug 17, 2009, at 4:30 PM, Wolfgang Huber wrote: > Hi Rajarshi, > > In addition to that...: > > While not a 'standard' (whatever that means), the reports generated > by cellHTS2 (which include a number of raw data and metadata files) > is what I and some colleagues perceive as a 'reasonable' format for > dataset exchange. > > Note that 'data format' and 'minimal information about' are > different things, one is an implementation, and one is conceptual. > > Best wishes > Wolfgang > > Laurent Gautier wrote: >> http://mibbi.sourceforge.net/projects/MIARE/ >> (I'd also recommend you to browse the MIBBI pages; lots of >> interesting >> thoughts there) >> L. >> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 10:09 -0400, Rajarshi Guha wrote: >>> Hi, this is not a statistical question, but I am looking for >>> standards >>> governing exchange of RNAi screening datasets. I know that for DNA >>> microarrays, MIAME exists. Is there something comparable for RNAi >>> screening >>> data? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioconductor mailing list >> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor ------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajarshi Guha <rajarshi.guha at="" gmail.com=""> GPG Fingerprint: D070 5427 CC5B 7938 929C DD13 66A1 922C 51E7 9E84 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Q: What's polite and works for the phone company? A: A deferential operator.