vsn on vsn
3
0
Entering edit mode
@dr-gyorffy-balazs-619
Last seen 9.6 years ago
Hi All! I want to merge the two different microarray datasets, one was VSN normalized and the other one quantile-normalized. Can I use a second VSN normalization? Any other normalization / related literature? Thanks: Balazs ------------------------- Balázs GYÖRFFY MD, PhD Research Laboratory for Pediatrics and Nephrology, Hungarian Academy of Sciences - Semmelweis University 1st Dept. of Pediatrics Bokay u. 53-54., Budapest H-1083 Office: +36 1 459 1500 /52772 Fax: +36 1 3036 077 Email: zsalab2@yahoo.com [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Microarray Normalization Microarray Normalization • 1.2k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@sean-davis-490
Last seen 3 months ago
United States
Hi, Balazs. You should probably merge at the "raw data" stage and then normalize the data together as one batch. Sean On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Dr Balazs Gyorffy <zsalab2 at="" yahoo.com=""> wrote: > Hi All! > > > I ?want to merge the two different microarray datasets, one was VSN normalized and the other one quantile-normalized. Can I use a second VSN normalization? Any other normalization / related literature? > > > Thanks: > > Balazs > > > ------------------------- > Bal?zs GY?RFFY MD, PhD > Research Laboratory for Pediatrics and Nephrology, Hungarian Academy of Sciences - Semmelweis University 1st Dept. of Pediatrics > Bokay u. 53-54., Budapest H-1083 > Office: +36 1 459 1500 /52772 > Fax: +36 1 3036 077 > Email: zsalab2 at yahoo.com > > ? ? ? ?[[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@sean-davis-490
Last seen 3 months ago
United States
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Dr Balazs Gyorffy <zsalab2 at="" yahoo.com=""> wrote: > The problem is that one of them is Illumina and the other one is Agilent, so > merging them at the raw data stage is very "hard". You should probably look at using a meta-analysis method rather than trying to merge "the numbers". This type of cross-dataset analysis can be quite challenging and depends on the details of the two datasets and the questions one is trying to answer. Defining how to do such an analysis in email without a lot more detail is not really possible. Sean > Best: > Balazs > > ------------------------- > Bal?zs GY?RFFY MD, PhD > Research Laboratory for Pediatrics and Nephrology, Hungarian Academy of > Sciences - Semmelweis University 1st Dept. of Pediatrics > Bokay u. 53-54., Budapest H-1083 > Office: +36 1 459 1500 /52772 > Fax: +36 1 3036 077 > Email: zsalab2 at yahoo.com > ________________________________ > Von: Sean Davis <sdavis2 at="" mail.nih.gov=""> > An: Dr Balazs Gyorffy <zsalab2 at="" yahoo.com=""> > Cc: "bioconductor at r-project.org" <bioconductor at="" r-project.org=""> > Gesendet: 13:39 Freitag, 16.September 2011 > Betreff: Re: [BioC] vsn on vsn > > Hi, Balazs. > > You should probably merge at the "raw data" stage and then normalize > the data together as one batch. > > Sean > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Dr Balazs Gyorffy <zsalab2 at="" yahoo.com=""> > wrote: >> Hi All! >> >> >> I ?want to merge the two different microarray datasets, one was VSN >> normalized and the other one quantile-normalized. Can I use a second VSN >> normalization? Any other normalization / related literature? >> >> >> Thanks: >> >> Balazs >> >> >> ------------------------- >> Bal?zs GY?RFFY MD, PhD >> Research Laboratory for Pediatrics and Nephrology, Hungarian Academy of >> Sciences - Semmelweis University 1st Dept. of Pediatrics >> Bokay u. 53-54., Budapest H-1083 >> Office: +36 1 459 1500 /52772 >> Fax: +36 1 3036 077 >> Email: zsalab2 at yahoo.com >> >> ? ? ? ?[[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioconductor mailing list >> Bioconductor at r-project.org >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >> Search the archives: >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >> > > >
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@sean-davis-490
Last seen 3 months ago
United States
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Dr Balazs Gyorffy <zsalab2 at="" yahoo.com=""> wrote: > Hi Sean, > we have an online computational site www.kmplot.com. In the site we have > integrated clinical information and several Affymetrix gene expression > datasets from GEO, and the user is capable to perform a meta- analysis on > these for predicting survival in breast and ovarian cancer. > I would like to set up a similar system for miRNA analysis. However, for > miRNA, only a very limited number of publications are available and these > are on different platforms. For example prostate cancer looks very promising > with two datasets with known relapse free survival: GSE26367 and GSE21032, > these are?on ?Agilent and Illumina. > > We are also working in the lab with miRNA, but again, on a different > platform (Invitrogen, see: > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=gyorffy%20mirna). > > I see that the different platforms have the same miRNA oligos (let-7, etc). > So the question is how to normalize them. One option is to use the raw data, > but since the arrays are different, the processing will be different anyway. > Another option is to take the normalized datasets from GEO and use a > cross-project normalization. Earlier for mRNA (not miRNA) this worked fine > for me using VSN. However, I see there that one of the datasets (the > GSE21032) was already VSN normalized. Hi, Balazs. My experience has been that cross-project normalization, while numerically possible, does not typically remove all the biases that exist between different platforms, I am not sure what to tell you. In some cases (apparently the case for the data on your website), the biases that likely remain are not too severe. Sorry I couldn't be more helpful. Sean > Best: > Balazs > > > ------------------------- > Bal?zs GY?RFFY MD, PhD > Research Laboratory for Pediatrics and Nephrology, Hungarian Academy of > Sciences - Semmelweis University 1st Dept. of Pediatrics > Bokay u. 53-54., Budapest H-1083 > Office: +36 1 459 1500 /52772 > Fax: +36 1 3036 077 > Email: zsalab2 at yahoo.com > ________________________________ > Von: Sean Davis <sdavis2 at="" mail.nih.gov=""> > An: Dr Balazs Gyorffy <zsalab2 at="" yahoo.com=""> > Cc: bioconductor at r-project.org > Gesendet: 14:35 Freitag, 16.September 2011 > Betreff: Re: [BioC] vsn on vsn > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Dr Balazs Gyorffy <zsalab2 at="" yahoo.com=""> > wrote: >> The problem is that one of them is Illumina and the other one is Agilent, >> so >> merging them at the raw data stage is very "hard". > > You should probably look at using a meta-analysis method rather than > trying to merge "the numbers".? This type of cross-dataset analysis > can be quite challenging and depends on the details of the two > datasets and the questions one is trying to answer.? Defining how to > do such an analysis in email without a lot more detail is not really > possible. > > Sean > > >> Best: >> Balazs >> >> ------------------------- >> Bal?zs GY?RFFY MD, PhD >> Research Laboratory for Pediatrics and Nephrology, Hungarian Academy of >> Sciences - Semmelweis University 1st Dept. of Pediatrics >> Bokay u. 53-54., Budapest H-1083 >> Office: +36 1 459 1500 /52772 >> Fax: +36 1 3036 077 >> Email: zsalab2 at yahoo.com >> ________________________________ >> Von: Sean Davis <sdavis2 at="" mail.nih.gov=""> >> An: Dr Balazs Gyorffy <zsalab2 at="" yahoo.com=""> >> Cc: "bioconductor at r-project.org" <bioconductor at="" r-project.org=""> >> Gesendet: 13:39 Freitag, 16.September 2011 >> Betreff: Re: [BioC] vsn on vsn >> >> Hi, Balazs. >> >> You should probably merge at the "raw data" stage and then normalize >> the data together as one batch. >> >> Sean >> >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Dr Balazs Gyorffy <zsalab2 at="" yahoo.com=""> >> wrote: >>> Hi All! >>> >>> >>> I ?want to merge the two different microarray datasets, one was VSN >>> normalized and the other one quantile-normalized. Can I use a second VSN >>> normalization? Any other normalization / related literature? >>> >>> >>> Thanks: >>> >>> Balazs >>> >>> >>> ------------------------- >>> Bal?zs GY?RFFY MD, PhD >>> Research Laboratory for Pediatrics and Nephrology, Hungarian Academy of >>> Sciences - Semmelweis University 1st Dept. of Pediatrics >>> Bokay u. 53-54., Budapest H-1083 >>> Office: +36 1 459 1500 /52772 >>> Fax: +36 1 3036 077 >>> Email: zsalab2 at yahoo.com >>> >>> ? ? ? ?[[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bioconductor mailing list >>> Bioconductor at r-project.org >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >>> Search the archives: >>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >>> >> >> >> > > >
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 682 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6