TMM factors
1
0
Entering edit mode
Sooby ▴ 30
@sooby-5237
Last seen 9.6 years ago
Hi all, I met a question when I analysed mRNA data. I use TMM provided in edgeR to normalizition my data. After I got the factors, How Do I treat my raw counts?? In my oppion, (raw.counts)*10^7/(librarysize*factors),Is It right? And another question is which librarysize do I need? The unique total reads or the reads mapped to each gene??? I need your help~~~ Best [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
• 836 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Mark Robinson ▴ 880
@mark-robinson-4908
Last seen 5.5 years ago
Hi Sooby, Some comments below. On 20.04.2012, at 04:32, Sooby wrote: > Hi all, > I met a question when I analysed mRNA data. I use TMM provided in edgeR to normalizition my data. After I got the factors, How Do I treat my raw counts?? In my oppion, (raw.counts)*10^7/(librarysize*factors),Is It right? So, this is correct, for a reads per 10M conversion. I'm not sure what you mean by "treat my raw counts". If you are doing differential expression with edgeR (or DESeq, etc.), we strongly suggest to use the raw counts, without "treating" them. > And another question is which librarysize do I need? The unique total reads or the reads mapped to each gene??? Usually, total number of mapped reads. Best, Mark > I need your help~~~ > Best > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 933 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6