Theoretical Question
1
0
Entering edit mode
Luckey, John ▴ 90
@luckey-john-202
Last seen 9.7 years ago
I posted a similar question last week and received some help with this problem, but I am still a bit unclear on the best way to proceed- any insights would be greatly appreciated. I want to identify a set of genes that are co-regulated with a given phenotype that is observed across various tissue types -to ID the 'signature' that corresponds to the phenotype regardless of tissue- Here is the simplest set up: (all data is affymetrix and has been pre- processed/normalized by rma) Tissue type A has 3 conditions: 1A, 2A, 3A Type B has 4 conditions: 1B, 2B, 3B, 4B My phenotype of interest is observed only in 1A and 1B. I am interested in knowing what is common (both up and down regulated) between 1A (relative only to 2A and 3A) and 1B (relative to 2B, 3B, and 4B). I have varying numbers of replicates per condition (2-5). I have done unsupervised clustering using all genes, and 1A and 1B don't cluster together (not really surprising since they are quite different in many respects , I am interested only in their overlapping phenotypes). I am not entirely sure how best to proceed. I have used straight fold change to ID unique genes in 1A vs 2A and 1A vs 3A. I then select those genes up (or down) in 1A in both comparisons. I then look at how the ?1A specific? genes are expressed in 1B vs all other B's- and there is a general positive skewing- but the concern is where to draw cutoffs- how to estimate FDR, etc in such a comparison. Basically, how does one go about saying that the skewing in a different comparison of a subset of genes is significant? Any insights you might have would be appreciated. Thx John Luckey, MD PhD Clinical Pathology Resident - Brigham and Womens Hospital Post Doctoral Fellow - Mathis - Benoist Lab Joslin Diabetes Center One Joslin Place, Rm. 474 Boston, MA 02215
GO Clustering GO Clustering • 804 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Naomi Altman ★ 6.0k
@naomi-altman-380
Last seen 3.1 years ago
United States
I would use ANOVA (lm or lme) followed by a contrast. It would likely be better to adjust the denominator (like SAM) but I don't think there is any software for this (or literature on exactly how to do it). So, probably the best thing for now is to treat this as a 1-way ANOVA with say a Bonferroni correction (for each gene). Once you have the Bonferroni-corrected p-values, you use FDR to determine an appropriate p-value to select genes. --Naomi At 02:10 PM 5/19/2004 -0400, Luckey, John wrote: >I posted a similar question last week and received some help with this >problem, but I am still a bit unclear on the best way to proceed- any >insights would be greatly appreciated. > >I want to identify a set of genes that are co-regulated with a given >phenotype that is observed across various tissue types -to ID the >'signature' that corresponds to the phenotype regardless of tissue- > > > >Here is the simplest set up: (all data is affymetrix and has been >pre-processed/normalized by rma) > > > >Tissue type A has 3 conditions: 1A, 2A, 3A > >Type B has 4 conditions: 1B, 2B, 3B, 4B > > > >My phenotype of interest is observed only in 1A and 1B. > > > >I am interested in knowing what is common (both up and down regulated) >between 1A (relative only to 2A and 3A) and 1B (relative to 2B, 3B, and >4B). I have varying numbers of replicates per condition (2-5). > > > >I have done unsupervised clustering using all genes, and 1A and 1B don't >cluster together (not really surprising since they are quite different in >many respects , I am interested only in their overlapping phenotypes). I >am not entirely sure how best to proceed. > > > >I have used straight fold change to ID unique genes in 1A vs 2A and 1A vs >3A. I then select those genes up (or down) in 1A in both comparisons. I >then look at how the ???1A specific??? genes are expressed in 1B vs all >other B's- and there is a general positive skewing- but the concern is >where to draw cutoffs- how to estimate FDR, etc in such a comparison. >Basically, how does one go about saying that the skewing in a different >comparison of a subset of genes is significant? > > > >Any insights you might have would be appreciated. > > > >Thx > > > > > >John Luckey, MD PhD > >Clinical Pathology Resident - Brigham and Womens Hospital > >Post Doctoral Fellow - Mathis - Benoist Lab > >Joslin Diabetes Center > >One Joslin Place, Rm. 474 > >Boston, MA 02215 > >_______________________________________________ >Bioconductor mailing list >Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch >https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor Naomi S. Altman 814-865-3791 (voice) Associate Professor Bioinformatics Consulting Center Dept. of Statistics 814-863-7114 (fax) Penn State University 814-865-1348 (Statistics) University Park, PA 16802-2111
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 524 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6