GO terms: Annotation for HumanMethylation450
2
1
Entering edit mode
@fabrice-tourre-4394
Last seen 9.6 years ago
Dear list, In the annotation file of Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip, http://support.illumina.com/documents/MyIllumina/b78d361a-def5-4adb- ab38-e8990625f053/HumanMethylation450_15017482_v.1.2.csv for each probe set, they do not have annotation for GO terms, pathways. As they have done in the annotation file: HG- U133_Plus_2.na32.annot.csv. Is there some bioconductor package to annotated the Infinium HumanMethylation450 probes? Given a probe, feed back the GO terms and pathways. Thank you very much in advance.
Annotation GO probe Annotation GO probe • 2.1k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Tim Triche ★ 4.2k
@tim-triche-3561
Last seen 3.6 years ago
United States
Oddly enough, the paper from UCSD with Illumina's folks on it (*) used the IlluminaHumanMethylation450k.db package (which I am currently rebuilding to have a startup message about toggleProbes()) to annotate both CpG islands and GO terms. (*) http://idekerlab.ucsd.edu/publications/Documents/Hannum_MolCell_2012.p df On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Fabrice Tourre <fabrice.ciup@gmail.com>wrote: > Dear list, > > In the annotation file of Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip, > > http://support.illumina.com/documents/MyIllumina/b78d361a-def5-4adb- ab38-e8990625f053/HumanMethylation450_15017482_v.1.2.csv > > for each probe set, they do not have annotation for GO terms, pathways. > > As they have done in the annotation file: HG- U133_Plus_2.na32.annot.csv. > > Is there some bioconductor package to annotated the Infinium > HumanMethylation450 probes? Given a probe, feed back the GO terms and > pathways. > > Thank you very much in advance. > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > -- *A model is a lie that helps you see the truth.* * * Howard Skipper<http: cancerres.aacrjournals.org="" content="" 31="" 9="" 1173.full.pdf=""> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Tim, Thank you very much for your reply. I have a list of probe list. Do you a example script for me to get the GO terms, instead of GO ID? The Documentation is not very clear for this. http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.11/data/annotation/html/Illumin aHumanMethylation450k.db.html On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. <tim.triche at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: > Oddly enough, the paper from UCSD with Illumina's folks on it (*) used the > IlluminaHumanMethylation450k.db package (which I am currently rebuilding to > have a startup message about toggleProbes()) to annotate both CpG islands > and GO terms. > > (*) > http://idekerlab.ucsd.edu/publications/Documents/Hannum_MolCell_2012 .pdf > > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Fabrice Tourre <fabrice.ciup at="" gmail.com=""> > wrote: >> >> Dear list, >> >> In the annotation file of Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip, >> >> http://support.illumina.com/documents/MyIllumina/b78d361a-def5 -4adb-ab38-e8990625f053/HumanMethylation450_15017482_v.1.2.csv >> >> for each probe set, they do not have annotation for GO terms, pathways. >> >> As they have done in the annotation file: HG- U133_Plus_2.na32.annot.csv. >> >> Is there some bioconductor package to annotated the Infinium >> HumanMethylation450 probes? Given a probe, feed back the GO terms and >> pathways. >> >> Thank you very much in advance. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioconductor mailing list >> Bioconductor at r-project.org >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >> Search the archives: >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > > > > > -- > A model is a lie that helps you see the truth. > > Howard Skipper
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
underscore • 0
@m-14387
Last seen 2.3 years ago
Germany

Is there any update on this? I used http://great.stanford.edu/public/html/ but would like to put more weight on relative TSS distance and direction of methylation change.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1066 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6