Limma\'s roast() does not accept weigths in combination with block
1
0
Entering edit mode
Guest User ★ 13k
@guest-user-4897
Last seen 10.2 years ago
Dear All, I am conducting enrichment tests using Limma's roast() function. As I am investigating RNA-Seq data, I have to introduce the weights calculated by voom(). Without a blocking variable, roast() runs without an itch but when I introduce a blocking variable (with or without correlation within blocks), roast() halts and returns "Can't use block with weights". Is the combination of weights and blocking variables in roast() generally impossible and if not, will it be possible in upcomming releases of limma? Thank you very much in advance, Moritz -- output of sessionInfo(): sessionInfo() R version 3.0.1 (2013-05-16) Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) locale: [1] LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C [3] LC_TIME=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=de_DE.UTF-8 [5] LC_MONETARY=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=de_DE.UTF-8 [7] LC_PAPER=C LC_NAME=C [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C attached base packages: [1] parallel splines stats graphics grDevices utils datasets [8] methods base other attached packages: [1] DESeq_1.12.0 lattice_0.20-15 locfit_1.5-9.1 Biobase_2.20.0 [5] BiocGenerics_0.6.0 statmod_1.4.17 edgeR_3.2.3 limma_3.16.5 loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] annotate_1.38.0 AnnotationDbi_1.22.6 compiler_3.0.1 [4] DBI_0.2-7 genefilter_1.42.0 geneplotter_1.38.0 [7] grid_3.0.1 IRanges_1.18.1 RColorBrewer_1.0-5 [10] RSQLite_0.11.4 stats4_3.0.1 survival_2.37-4 [13] tools_3.0.1 XML_3.98-1.1 xtable_1.7-1 -- Sent via the guest posting facility at bioconductor.org.
• 865 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@gordon-smyth
Last seen 6 hours ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia
> Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 03:36:49 -0700 (PDT) > From: "Moritz Hess [guest]" <guest at="" bioconductor.org=""> > To: bioconductor at r-project.org, ssehztirom at gmail.com > Subject: [BioC] Limma\'s roast() does not accept weigths in > combination with block > > Dear All, > > I am conducting enrichment tests using Limma's roast() function. As I > am investigating RNA-Seq data, I have to introduce the weights > calculated by voom(). Without a blocking variable, roast() runs without > an itch but when I introduce a blocking variable (with or without > correlation within blocks), roast() halts and returns "Can't use block > with weights". Is the combination of weights and blocking variables in > roast() generally impossible Not impossible, but requires some careful special case programming. > and if not, will it be possible in upcomming releases of limma? Yes, but not in the next few weeks. Gordon > Thank you very much in advance, > > Moritz > > -- output of sessionInfo(): > > sessionInfo() > R version 3.0.1 (2013-05-16) > Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) > > locale: > [1] LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C > [3] LC_TIME=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=de_DE.UTF-8 > [5] LC_MONETARY=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=de_DE.UTF-8 > [7] LC_PAPER=C LC_NAME=C > [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C > [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C > > attached base packages: > [1] parallel splines stats graphics grDevices utils datasets > [8] methods base > > other attached packages: > [1] DESeq_1.12.0 lattice_0.20-15 locfit_1.5-9.1 Biobase_2.20.0 > [5] BiocGenerics_0.6.0 statmod_1.4.17 edgeR_3.2.3 limma_3.16.5 > > loaded via a namespace (and not attached): > [1] annotate_1.38.0 AnnotationDbi_1.22.6 compiler_3.0.1 > [4] DBI_0.2-7 genefilter_1.42.0 geneplotter_1.38.0 > [7] grid_3.0.1 IRanges_1.18.1 RColorBrewer_1.0-5 > [10] RSQLite_0.11.4 stats4_3.0.1 survival_2.37-4 > [13] tools_3.0.1 XML_3.98-1.1 xtable_1.7-1 > > > -- ______________________________________________________________________ The information in this email is confidential and intend...{{dropped:4}}
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Hi Gordon, thanks for your response. I appreciate very much to hear that this feature will be implemented in future releases of limma. Best regards, Moritz 2013/8/6 Gordon K Smyth <smyth@wehi.edu.au> > Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 03:36:49 -0700 (PDT) >> From: "Moritz Hess [guest]" <guest@bioconductor.org> >> To: bioconductor@r-project.org, ssehztirom@gmail.com >> Subject: [BioC] Limma\'s roast() does not accept weigths in >> combination with block >> >> Dear All, >> >> I am conducting enrichment tests using Limma's roast() function. As I am >> investigating RNA-Seq data, I have to introduce the weights calculated by >> voom(). Without a blocking variable, roast() runs without an itch but when >> I introduce a blocking variable (with or without correlation within >> blocks), roast() halts and returns "Can't use block with weights". Is the >> combination of weights and blocking variables in roast() generally >> impossible >> > > Not impossible, but requires some careful special case programming. > > and if not, will it be possible in upcomming releases of limma? >> > > Yes, but not in the next few weeks. > > Gordon > > Thank you very much in advance, >> >> Moritz >> >> -- output of sessionInfo(): >> >> sessionInfo() >> R version 3.0.1 (2013-05-16) >> Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) >> >> locale: >> [1] LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C >> [3] LC_TIME=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=de_DE.UTF-8 >> [5] LC_MONETARY=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=de_DE.UTF-8 >> [7] LC_PAPER=C LC_NAME=C >> [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C >> [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C >> >> attached base packages: >> [1] parallel splines stats graphics grDevices utils datasets >> [8] methods base >> >> other attached packages: >> [1] DESeq_1.12.0 lattice_0.20-15 locfit_1.5-9.1 >> Biobase_2.20.0 >> [5] BiocGenerics_0.6.0 statmod_1.4.17 edgeR_3.2.3 limma_3.16.5 >> >> loaded via a namespace (and not attached): >> [1] annotate_1.38.0 AnnotationDbi_1.22.6 compiler_3.0.1 >> [4] DBI_0.2-7 genefilter_1.42.0 geneplotter_1.38.0 >> [7] grid_3.0.1 IRanges_1.18.1 RColorBrewer_1.0-5 >> [10] RSQLite_0.11.4 stats4_3.0.1 survival_2.37-4 >> [13] tools_3.0.1 XML_3.98-1.1 xtable_1.7-1 >> >> >> -- >> > > ______________________________**______________________________**____ ______ > The information in this email is confidential and inte...{{dropped:25}}
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 882 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6