B statistic in limmaGUI
3
0
Entering edit mode
@elizabeth-brooke-powell-838
Last seen 10.2 years ago
I am wondering as a biologist what a negative B value might mean in the top genes table and on a volcano plot. Does it mean something is confidently not moving (as B is related to movement) or is it just crap data? Thanks for your opinions in advance, Liz Molteno Building Department of Pathology University of Cambridge Tennis Court Road Cambridge, CB2 1QP United Kingdom Website: http://www.path.cam.ac.uk/~toxo/ Tel 01223 33 33 31(office) or 01223 33 33 29 (lab) [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
• 2.7k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@sean-davis-490
Last seen 3 months ago
United States
Liz, It isn't a measure of data quality. It is a measure of the likelihood of differential expression. Negative values mean odds are that it is not differentially expressed. Sean On Aug 19, 2004, at 7:53 AM, Elizabeth Brooke-Powell wrote: > I am wondering as a biologist what a negative B value might mean in > the top > genes table and on a volcano plot. Does it mean something is > confidently not > moving (as B is related to movement) or is it just crap data? > > Thanks for your opinions in advance, > > Liz > > Molteno Building > Department of Pathology > University of Cambridge > Tennis Court Road > Cambridge, CB2 1QP > United Kingdom > > Website: http://www.path.cam.ac.uk/~toxo/ > Tel 01223 33 33 31(office) or 01223 33 33 29 (lab) > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Sean, Thanks for getting back to me so quickly, just so I follow your explanation, the more negative the number i.e. -6 vs -1 the greater the odds of it not being expressed? What does having a negative number actually mean in relationship to 0 or a positive number? Thanks again, Liz -----Original Message----- From: Sean Davis [mailto:sdavis2@mail.nih.gov] Sent: 19 August 2004 13:33 To: Elizabeth Brooke-Powell Cc: Bioconductor Subject: Re: [BioC] B statistic in limmaGUI Liz, It isn't a measure of data quality. It is a measure of the likelihood of differential expression. Negative values mean odds are that it is not differentially expressed. Sean
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
Liz, B is a lod (logarithm of the odds), so even odds (1:1) are given a value of 0. Better than average is positive and worse is negative. Sean On Aug 19, 2004, at 8:43 AM, Elizabeth Brooke-Powell wrote: > Sean, > > Thanks for getting back to me so quickly, just so I follow your > explanation, > the more negative the number i.e. -6 vs -1 the greater the odds of it > not > being expressed? What does having a negative number actually mean in > relationship to 0 or a positive number? > > Thanks again, > > Liz > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Davis [mailto:sdavis2@mail.nih.gov] > Sent: 19 August 2004 13:33 > To: Elizabeth Brooke-Powell > Cc: Bioconductor > Subject: Re: [BioC] B statistic in limmaGUI > > Liz, > > It isn't a measure of data quality. It is a measure of the likelihood > of differential expression. Negative values mean odds are that it is > not differentially expressed. > > Sean > >
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
Hi Sean, Does +ve mean better then average odds that it is differentially expressed and therefore does the more -ve mean that the odds are greater that it is not differentially expressed? Is there some meaning that the lowest B values tend to be about -6? Liz -----Original Message----- From: Sean Davis [mailto:sdavis2@mail.nih.gov] Sent: 19 August 2004 13:59 To: Elizabeth Brooke-Powell Cc: bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [BioC] B statistic in limmaGUI Liz, B is a lod (logarithm of the odds), so even odds (1:1) are given a value of 0. Better than average is positive and worse is negative. Sean
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
@elizabeth-brooke-powell-838
Last seen 10.2 years ago
Hi Sean, Thanks for your help, and here is our final question on this matter. We are interested in things that do not move. From our current understanding (maybe completely wrong) that analogous to finding things that move (are differentially expressed) should we ask for B values from some negative value to the lowest B value? Thanks again, Liz -----Original Message----- From: Sean Davis [mailto:sdavis2@mail.nih.gov] Sent: 19 August 2004 15:28 To: Elizabeth Brooke-Powell Subject: Re: [BioC] B statistic in limmaGUI I have yet to hear from anyone else regarding the "realistic" interpretation of the B-values, but negative B-values are not very interesting (they are more than likely not differentially expressed). Also, I don't know if there is any deep meaning in the minimum B value. Sean On Aug 19, 2004, at 9:09 AM, Elizabeth Brooke-Powell wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Does +ve mean better then average odds that it is differentially > expressed > and therefore does the more -ve mean that the odds are greater that it > is > not differentially expressed? Is there some meaning that the lowest B > values > tend to be about -6? > > Liz > >
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Elizabeth Brooke-Powell wrote: > We are > interested in things that do not move. From our current > understanding Hi Liz, The tests for differential expression in limma, limmaGUI etc. are generally set up to test for differential expression, rather than lack of it. If you ask the question "How many genes are not differentially expressed in one comparison?", the answer would usually be thousands of genes! By looking at the most negative B statistics, you are not only looking at genes whose expression levels are unchanged, but you could also be looking at genes whose changes in expression are extremely variable between replicate arrays (so they are not ranked as high as genes whose changes in expression are perfectly consistent between replicates). It is natural to get noise around M=0, i.e. there are usually lots of genes which are not differentially expressed, but do not all sit exactly on M=0. If you want to narrow down the list a bit, you could try using limma from the command-line (using the function classifyTestsF), to ask questions like "Which genes are differentially expressed in one comparison, but are not differentially expressed in another comparison?". Hope this helps, James
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
James, Thank you for that extra information, very well explained, and makes a lot of sense. Liz -----Original Message----- From: James Wettenhall [mailto:wettenhall@wehi.edu.au] Sent: 20 August 2004 08:05 To: Elizabeth Brooke-Powell Cc: 'Sean Davis'; bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: RE: [BioC] B statistic in limmaGUI On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Elizabeth Brooke-Powell wrote: > We are > interested in things that do not move. From our current > understanding Hi Liz, The tests for differential expression in limma, limmaGUI etc. are generally set up to test for differential expression, rather than lack of it. If you ask the question "How many genes are not differentially expressed in one comparison?", the answer would usually be thousands of genes! By looking at the most negative B statistics, you are not only looking at genes whose expression levels are unchanged, but you could also be looking at genes whose changes in expression are extremely variable between replicate arrays (so they are not ranked as high as genes whose changes in expression are perfectly consistent between replicates). It is natural to get noise around M=0, i.e. there are usually lots of genes which are not differentially expressed, but do not all sit exactly on M=0. If you want to narrow down the list a bit, you could try using limma from the command-line (using the function classifyTestsF), to ask questions like "Which genes are differentially expressed in one comparison, but are not differentially expressed in another comparison?". Hope this helps, James
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
Jason Hipp ▴ 40
@jason-hipp-557
Last seen 10.2 years ago
What is the difference between a B value of 1 vs 2 vs 10? How high can a B value go? Thanks, Jason ________________________________ From: bioconductor-bounces@stat.math.ethz.ch on behalf of Elizabeth Brooke-Powell Sent: Thu 8/19/2004 11:48 AM To: 'Sean Davis' Cc: bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: RE: [BioC] B statistic in limmaGUI Hi Sean, Thanks for your help, and here is our final question on this matter. We are interested in things that do not move. From our current understanding (maybe completely wrong) that analogous to finding things that move (are differentially expressed) should we ask for B values from some negative value to the lowest B value? Thanks again, Liz -----Original Message----- From: Sean Davis [mailto:sdavis2@mail.nih.gov] Sent: 19 August 2004 15:28 To: Elizabeth Brooke-Powell Subject: Re: [BioC] B statistic in limmaGUI I have yet to hear from anyone else regarding the "realistic" interpretation of the B-values, but negative B-values are not very interesting (they are more than likely not differentially expressed). Also, I don't know if there is any deep meaning in the minimum B value. Sean On Aug 19, 2004, at 9:09 AM, Elizabeth Brooke-Powell wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Does +ve mean better then average odds that it is differentially > expressed > and therefore does the more -ve mean that the odds are greater that it > is > not differentially expressed? Is there some meaning that the lowest B > values > tend to be about -6? > > Liz > > _______________________________________________ Bioconductor mailing list Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 539 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6