fRMA- more issues with custom CDFs
1
0
Entering edit mode
@cornwell-adam-5680
Last seen 2.5 years ago
United States
Hello, I've previously used fRMA and the MBNI BrainArray CDFs with some success, but the last time I tried was a year ago. I just updated to R 3.0.2 and the newest version of BioC. I'm trying to use fRMA with some U133+ 2.0 arrays, and getting errors with custom CDFs. It works fine with the stock CDFs. I've tried both robust_weighted_average and random_effect for summarization. I've also tried BrainArray CDF versions from 15 to 18 (all EntrezGene). The error is different between using random_effect and robust_weighted_average. With robust_weighted_average I get "Error in rcModelWPLM(y = x1, w = w.tmp, row.effects = pe.tmp, input.scale = x4) : row.effects should sum to zero". Aside from the convenience of summarize straight to gene-level, would you actually recommend using the BrainArray CDFs with fRMA? It seems like the combination of probe weighting based on data, and probe selection based on re-annotation would produce some nice results- if using the custom CDFs doesn't break any assumptions made in fRMA. Thanks for the help again. R version 3.0.2 (2013-09-25) Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit) locale: [1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252 LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252 LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252 LC_NUMERIC=C [5] LC_TIME=English_United States.1252 attached base packages: [1] grid parallel stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base other attached packages: [1] hgu133plus2cdf_2.13.0 hgu133plus2frmavecs_1.3.0 hgu133plus2hsentrezgcdf_16.0.0 heatmap.plus_1.3 frma_1.14.0 [6] GGally_0.4.5 reshape_0.8.4 plyr_1.8 RColorBrewer_1.0-5 ggplot2_0.9.3.1 [11] xlsx_0.5.5 xlsxjars_0.5.0 rJava_0.9-6 annotate_1.40.0 org.Hs.eg.db_2.10.1 [16] puma_3.4.0 mclust_4.2 VennDiagram_1.6.5 scatterplot3d_0.3-35 annaffy_1.34.0 [21] KEGG.db_2.10.1 GO.db_2.10.1 RSQLite_0.11.4 DBI_0.2-7 AnnotationDbi_1.24.0 [26] gplots_2.12.1 MASS_7.3-29 affyPLM_1.38.0 preprocessCore_1.24.0 simpleaffy_2.38.0 [31] gcrma_2.34.0 genefilter_1.44.0 marray_1.40.0 limma_3.18.12 BiocInstaller_1.12.0 [36] affy_1.40.0 Biobase_2.22.0 BiocGenerics_0.8.0 loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] affxparser_1.34.0 affyio_1.30.0 Biostrings_2.30.1 bit_1.1-11 bitops_1.0-6 caTools_1.16 codetools_0.2-8 [8] colorspace_1.2-4 dichromat_2.0-0 digest_0.6.4 ff_2.2-12 foreach_1.4.1 gdata_2.13.2 GenomicRanges_1.14.4 [15] gtable_0.1.2 gtools_3.3.0 IRanges_1.20.6 iterators_1.0.6 KernSmooth_2.23-10 labeling_0.2 munsell_0.4.2 [22] oligo_1.26.2 oligoClasses_1.24.0 proto_0.3-10 reshape2_1.2.2 scales_0.2.3 splines_3.0.2 stats4_3.0.2 [29] stringr_0.6.2 survival_2.37-7 tools_3.0.2 XML_3.98-1.1 xtable_1.7-1 XVector_0.2.0 zlibbioc_1.8.0 Adam Cornwell Programmer/Analyst [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
GO probe frma GO probe frma • 803 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@matthew-mccall-4459
Last seen 2.4 years ago
United States
Adam, It seems to work fine for me (see below). Not sure what the issue is; the only difference I see between our sessionInfo() is 64bit vs 32bit. I am a few versions behind on the alternative CDFs -- currently all the frmavecs use entrezg v16. But you seem to have figured this out based on your sessionInfo(). As to your bigger question, using the alternative CDFs doesn't violate any assumptions in fRMA, and a fair number of other people use them together. I do have to make a separate set of frozen parameter vectors for these CDFs and since they are updated fairly regularly, I am often a version or two behind. But that's not a reason to not use them (and bug me when I fall too far behind). > library(affy) > library(hgu133plus2hsentrezgcdf) Loading required package: AnnotationDbi > tst=ReadAffy(filenames=dir()[5:7],cdfname="hgu133plus2hsentrezgcdf") > library(frma) > tst2=frma(tst) > tst3=frma(tst,summarize="random_effect") > sessionInfo() R version 3.0.2 (2013-09-25) Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu (32-bit) locale: [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8 [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8 [7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C attached base packages: [1] parallel stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods [8] base other attached packages: [1] hgu133plus2frmavecs_1.3.0 frma_1.14.0 [3] hgu133plus2hsentrezgcdf_16.0.0 AnnotationDbi_1.24.0 [5] affy_1.40.0 Biobase_2.22.0 [7] BiocGenerics_0.8.0 loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] affxparser_1.34.0 affyio_1.30.0 BiocInstaller_1.12.0 [4] Biostrings_2.30.1 bit_1.1-11 codetools_0.2-8 [7] DBI_0.2-7 ff_2.2-12 foreach_1.4.1 [10] GenomicRanges_1.14.4 IRanges_1.20.6 iterators_1.0.6 [13] MASS_7.3-29 oligo_1.26.0 oligoClasses_1.24.0 [16] preprocessCore_1.24.0 RSQLite_0.11.4 splines_3.0.2 [19] stats4_3.0.2 tools_3.0.2 XVector_0.2.0 [22] zlibbioc_1.8.0 On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Cornwell, Adam <adam_cornwell at="" urmc.rochester.edu=""> wrote: > Hello, > > I've previously used fRMA and the MBNI BrainArray CDFs with some success, but the last time I tried was a year ago. I just updated to R 3.0.2 and the newest version of BioC. I'm trying to use fRMA with some U133+ 2.0 arrays, and getting errors with custom CDFs. It works fine with the stock CDFs. I've tried both robust_weighted_average and random_effect for summarization. I've also tried BrainArray CDF versions from 15 to 18 (all EntrezGene). The error is different between using random_effect and robust_weighted_average. > With robust_weighted_average I get "Error in rcModelWPLM(y = x1, w = w.tmp, row.effects = pe.tmp, input.scale = x4) : > row.effects should sum to zero". > > Aside from the convenience of summarize straight to gene-level, would you actually recommend using the BrainArray CDFs with fRMA? It seems like the combination of probe weighting based on data, and probe selection based on re-annotation would produce some nice results- if using the custom CDFs doesn't break any assumptions made in fRMA. > > Thanks for the help again. > > R version 3.0.2 (2013-09-25) > Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit) > > locale: > [1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252 LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252 LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252 LC_NUMERIC=C > [5] LC_TIME=English_United States.1252 > > attached base packages: > [1] grid parallel stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base > > other attached packages: > [1] hgu133plus2cdf_2.13.0 hgu133plus2frmavecs_1.3.0 hgu133plus2hsentrezgcdf_16.0.0 heatmap.plus_1.3 frma_1.14.0 > [6] GGally_0.4.5 reshape_0.8.4 plyr_1.8 RColorBrewer_1.0-5 ggplot2_0.9.3.1 > [11] xlsx_0.5.5 xlsxjars_0.5.0 rJava_0.9-6 annotate_1.40.0 org.Hs.eg.db_2.10.1 > [16] puma_3.4.0 mclust_4.2 VennDiagram_1.6.5 scatterplot3d_0.3-35 annaffy_1.34.0 > [21] KEGG.db_2.10.1 GO.db_2.10.1 RSQLite_0.11.4 DBI_0.2-7 AnnotationDbi_1.24.0 > [26] gplots_2.12.1 MASS_7.3-29 affyPLM_1.38.0 preprocessCore_1.24.0 simpleaffy_2.38.0 > [31] gcrma_2.34.0 genefilter_1.44.0 marray_1.40.0 limma_3.18.12 BiocInstaller_1.12.0 > [36] affy_1.40.0 Biobase_2.22.0 BiocGenerics_0.8.0 > > loaded via a namespace (and not attached): > [1] affxparser_1.34.0 affyio_1.30.0 Biostrings_2.30.1 bit_1.1-11 bitops_1.0-6 caTools_1.16 codetools_0.2-8 > [8] colorspace_1.2-4 dichromat_2.0-0 digest_0.6.4 ff_2.2-12 foreach_1.4.1 gdata_2.13.2 GenomicRanges_1.14.4 > [15] gtable_0.1.2 gtools_3.3.0 IRanges_1.20.6 iterators_1.0.6 KernSmooth_2.23-10 labeling_0.2 munsell_0.4.2 > [22] oligo_1.26.2 oligoClasses_1.24.0 proto_0.3-10 reshape2_1.2.2 scales_0.2.3 splines_3.0.2 stats4_3.0.2 > [29] stringr_0.6.2 survival_2.37-7 tools_3.0.2 XML_3.98-1.1 xtable_1.7-1 XVector_0.2.0 zlibbioc_1.8.0 > > > Adam Cornwell > Programmer/Analyst > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor -- Matthew N McCall, PhD 112 Arvine Heights Rochester, NY 14611 Cell: 202-222-5880
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 282 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6