Could limma be as good as GeneSpring in normalization?
0
0
Entering edit mode
@elizabeth-brooke-powell-838
Last seen 9.7 years ago
Hi there, Your best bet is to contact silicon genetics (now part of agilent) about genespring. Their website is http://www.silicongenetics.com/cgi/SiG.cgi/index.smf Personally I don't like GeneSpring as it does not do very well with complicated microarray designs and works best (really only in my hands) with indirect experiment designs. Not too mention it is seriously expensive. Liz ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:44:05 +0800 From: xpzhang <xpzhang@genetics.ac.cn> Subject: [BioC] Could limma be as good as GeneSpring in nomalization? To: bioconductor <bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch> Message-ID: <20041125163802.B7A3.XPZHANG@genetics.ac.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi, Today I read a paper in Plant Cell, and the researcheres used GeneSpring 4.2 software (Silicon Genetics, Redwood, CA) to nomalize their data. I wonder if anyone here knows something about the software, and if this software has more function than limma. Thank you very much! -- Xiaopeng ZHANG<xpzhang@genetics.ac.cn> ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bioconductor mailing list Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor End of Bioconductor Digest, Vol 21, Issue 24
Microarray Genetics limma GeneSpring Microarray Genetics limma GeneSpring • 899 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 463 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6