Dear Bioconductor Community,
i would like to ask an "introductory" but important question regarding the appropriate interpretation/explanation of background correction for Illumina Bead Arrays. Recently, i have acquired an Illumina Human HT-12 v4 beadchip microarray dataset. My main question is mostly general but in conjuction to limma normalization function for illumina microarrays:
In detail, as my "sample probe profile" txt file which includes the probe summary file, from which a very small subset for the first sample looks like this:
PROBE_ID SYMBOL 1A.AVG_Signal 1A.Detection.Pval 1A.BEAD_STDERR 1A.Avg_NBEADS ILMN_1762337 7A5 113.6922 0.46233770 3.659430 23 ILMN_2055271 A 1BG 162.7333 0.02077922 6.885669 23 ILMN_1736007 A 1BG 114.4497 0.44545450 3.599054 31 ILMN_2383229 A 1CF 122.7193 0.25974030 8.953144 15 ILMN_1806310 A 1CF 134.9052 0.14285710 8.729850 18 ILMN_1779670 A 1CF 130.3925 0.18441560 8.197718 19
Even though i had pre-processed in the past illumina microarrays, my question is the following:
from the above file i can see(and after importing with read.ilmn) that these are raw summarized intensities. However, can i also assume that also are not background substracted ? In other words, the default output from BeadStudio/GenomeStudio does perform some kind of background correction ? Or im mistaken and only is an option(as i dont see any negative values in the above file )?
Finally, even if is the case , this should not be a consern as neqc includes a default offset ??
Please excuse me for my naive(even "silly") question, but because i have aqcuired the above file with also two more files(phenotype info and controls info) without any other information, this matter troubles me !!
Any suggestion would be essential !!
Dear Gordon
thank you very much for your answer !! Because in some tutorials i have found only a very short (and a bit confusing description of the Illumina software)-thats why i was worried about this specific issue of "global background correction" you pinpoint above. One quick(maybe again naive) supplementary question about this global background correction: in case this global background correction has been performed, one should expect when inspecting raw intensities that could be "significantly low" or even negative ??
Best,
Efstathios
If the data has been global background corrected, then many of the intensities will be negative or zero.
Thank you again Gordon for the confirmation !!!