design parameter for multi-factor combinations
1
0
Entering edit mode
kjo ▴ 70
@kjo-11078
Last seen 7.3 years ago

I have rnaseq data for various combinations of three different factors (let's call them X, Y, and Z).  Some of these combinations represent controls, and the rest represent treatments.

I want to perform differential gene expression analysis for various pairs of treatment and control combinations.

I can't figure out how to specify the design parameter for this sort of analysis.

If I specify the design parameter as

    design ~ X + Y + Z

...then resultNames(dds) includes names like "X0", "X1", ..., "Y0", "Y1", etc. whereas for the contrasts I'm interested in, I'd need resultNames(dds) to return names corresponding to the different combinations I want to compare, i.e. something like "X0.Y0.Z0", ..., "X3.Y4.Z5", etc.

One "solution" is to stratify the data into subsets corresponding to combinations of the levels of two of the factors (say, X and Y), and then perform the DE analysis on each subset using design = ~ Z.

Is there a simpler way to achieve this?

 

deseq2 • 721 views
ADD COMMENT
2
Entering edit mode
@mikelove
Last seen 31 minutes ago
United States

That's the easiest way to achieve comparisons of pairs of levels and what we suggest in the DESeq2 vignette.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks for your comment.  I have not been able, however, to locate in the DESeq2 vignette the suggestion you mentioned.  I looked in subsection 1.6, titled "Multi-factor designs".  There the design used is ~ type + condition, but, as I mentioned in my question, designs that combine various factors using + result in names that are not suitable for the contrasts I want to analyze.  Did you have some other part of the vignette in mind?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

It's section 3.3 of the vignette which says "If the comparisons of interest are, for example, the effect of a condition for different sets of samples, a simpler approach than adding interaction terms explicitly to the design formula is to perform the following steps: 1. combine the factors of interest into a single factor with all combinations of the original factors 2. change the design to include just this factor, e.g. ∼ group"

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

That's definitely much easier and elegant than what I had in mind.  Thanks!

 

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 476 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6