Is it important to use TMM normalization factors after RUVg correction?
I included library size as a factor of unwanted variation.
What I understand so far is when calculating cpm values, the counts will be calculated from raw counts and ruv lib sizes which are effective library sizes and set norm.factors to 1.
Also, do I have to use voom with quality weights while already using RUVg correction?
dge=perform.RUVg.correction(dge = dge, k.variables = 3,
variable.to.assess = c("Age","lib.size"),
variable.threshold = c(0.2, 0.8),
ruvg.pvalue.threshold.group = 1e-2,
ruvg.pvalue.threshold.strongest.variable = 1e-2,
number.cores = 2,
verbose = TRUE)
cpm=cpm.DGEList(dge)
Written by (Veld et al., 2022)
This support site is meant to help people who have technical questions about Bioconductor packages. Your question has to do with non-Bioconductor code, and is more application based. You might try over on biostars.org instead.