User: Akula, Nirmala NIH/NIMH [C]

Reputation:
180
Status:
Trusted
Location:
Last seen:
4 months ago
Joined:
7 years, 1 month ago
Email:
a*****@mail.nih.gov

Posts by Akula, Nirmala NIH/NIMH [C]

<prev • 32 results • page 1 of 4 • next >
0
votes
1
answer
191
views
1
answers
Comment: C: EdgeR vs DESeq2 with/without lfcShrink
... Sorry Aaron for calling you Steve. Sincerely appreciate your response. Thanks, Nirmala ...
written 4 months ago by Akula, Nirmala NIH/NIMH [C]180
0
votes
1
answer
191
views
1
answers
Comment: C: EdgeR vs DESeq2 with/without lfcShrink
... Thanks Steve for your response. The fact that the log fold changes are so different between different programs makes it harder to believe which one is correct.  I tried different prior.count and sometimes there is change in the LFC and sometimes not. What is the best way to chose the prior.count fo ...
written 4 months ago by Akula, Nirmala NIH/NIMH [C]180
3
votes
1
answer
191
views
1
answer
EdgeR vs DESeq2 with/without lfcShrink
...   Hi, I did my analysis using EdgeR and with DESeq2 with and without lfcShrink. At FDR<10% we have the following: EdgeR - 17 genes  DESeq2 without LFC shrink - 37 DESeq2 with LFC shrink - 54 Only 10 genes overlap between all the 3 methods at FDR<10%. The fold change for EdgeR and DESeq2 ...
edger and deseq2 written 4 months ago by Akula, Nirmala NIH/NIMH [C]180 • updated 4 months ago by Aaron Lun22k
0
votes
1
answer
130
views
1
answers
Comment: C: DESeq2 - order of covariates in the design
... Thanks for your help Mike. In a new R session they are same. Interesting!  ...
written 4 months ago by Akula, Nirmala NIH/NIMH [C]180
0
votes
1
answer
130
views
1
answers
Comment: C: DESeq2 - order of covariates in the design
... Hi Mike,  When I ran your example it is TRUE. Not sure why I am getting different answers on my data. Any suggestions will be helpful. Thanks, Nirmala ...
written 4 months ago by Akula, Nirmala NIH/NIMH [C]180
0
votes
1
answer
130
views
1
answer
DESeq2 - order of covariates in the design
... Hi, Can someone explain why the number of differentially expressed genes at FDR<10% changes when the order of variables changes in the design? Option1: Condition given at the end of the design matrix -  54 genes at FDR<10% >dds=DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData=countData,colData=coldata,d ...
deseq2 written 4 months ago by Akula, Nirmala NIH/NIMH [C]180 • updated 4 months ago by Michael Love21k
0
votes
2
answers
267
views
2
answers
Comment: C: CQN offset and edgeR
... Hi Gordon and Steve, As you suggested the results are slightly different (only in the decimals). Does this mean CQN normalization is not important in this particular analysis? The code with offset: > design <- model.matrix(~coldata$condition + race + rin + gc)   > y <- DGEList(counts= ...
written 4 months ago by Akula, Nirmala NIH/NIMH [C]180
0
votes
2
answers
267
views
2
answers
Comment: C: CQN offset and edgeR
... Hi Steve, Whether I use the cqn offset (y$offset <- mycqn$glm.offset) or not I get the same results As CQN manual mentions that sometimes standard analysis gives the same results as when using CQN or whether the offset is working or not? Is there a way to test this? Thanks, Nirmala ...
written 4 months ago by Akula, Nirmala NIH/NIMH [C]180
0
votes
2
answers
267
views
2
answers
Comment: C: CQN offset and edgeR
...   Hi Gordon, Thanks for your response. I get the following error when I use offset command in glmFit > mydataGlmFit=glmFit(y,design,offset=mycqn$glm.offset) Error in glmFit.default(y = y$counts, design = design, dispersion = dispersion,  :    formal argument "offset" matched by multiple actu ...
written 4 months ago by Akula, Nirmala NIH/NIMH [C]180
2
votes
2
answers
267
views
2
answers
CQN offset and edgeR
... Hi, I am trying to use cqn offset in EdgeR and getting very low p-values (FDR < 10e-100). Is the offset working correctly?  Or I am missing some steps in the code? > mycqn=cqn(countData,lengths=uCovar$GeneLength,x=uCovar$GCcontent, + sizeFactors=sizeFactors$V2,verbose=TRUE) > offset=mycq ...
cqn and edger written 4 months ago by Akula, Nirmala NIH/NIMH [C]180 • updated 4 months ago by Steve Lianoglou12k

Latest awards to Akula, Nirmala NIH/NIMH [C]

Popular Question 4 months ago, created a question with more than 1,000 views. For Correcting for known and surrogate variables in DESeq2
Popular Question 22 months ago, created a question with more than 1,000 views. For Correcting for known and surrogate variables in DESeq2

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 16.09
Traffic: 128 users visited in the last hour