Transcript counts in DESeq2
1
0
Entering edit mode
SannaG • 0
@sannag-18016
Last seen 5.6 years ago

Hi,

When one have generated counts using FeatureCounts it generates a list of transcripts and note genes. I understand the procotol as "gene"-counts should be used - however how is genecounts defined? Can I use the transcript-count-lists as input in the DESeq2 analysis?

Or should one convertet the transcript-counts (generated from featurecounts) to gene-counts? Is that what you are explaining in the protocol under: "Transcript abundance files and tximport input"? I dont really follow:

http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#transcript-abundance-files-and-tximport-input

 

Concluding question: Is it fine to use transcript-counts from FeatureCounts as input?

 

Best regards,

S

deseq2 • 1.6k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@mikelove
Last seen 1 hour ago
United States

This is better as a featureCounts question, and you may want to repost and instead tag the Rsubread package instead of DESeq2.

featureCounts can provide you with gene counts. Read over their instruction manual.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

thank you for your answer. I am still curious if I can use DESeq to to analys the differential expression of each transcript. Would there be a problem with using transcript as input insteed of genes? Given that I would like to look at each transcript seperatly and not the gene as a whole.

Thank you

S

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

We profiled this in a recent F1000Research publication. See the section "DTE evaluation".

DESeq2 on transcript counts seems to work decently (room for improvement, which we are working on), but an important caveat is that we quantified transcript expression using Salmon. I would recommend to use a transcript quantification method such as Salmon, kallisto, RSEM, etc. to obtain transcript counts. I collaborated on Salmon, and I think the advantage to using this method is that is pretty good at resolving between differences in coverage due to usage of specific isoform(s) and coverage variability due to technical biases.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 415 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6