Closed:Correct way to analyze the data/look at significant variations
1
0
Entering edit mode
skamboj • 0
@skamboj-21199
Last seen 4.8 years ago

Looking at the variation between untreated individuals in affected vs unaffected (SMS-unt vs Con-unt)

For filtering, I am doing CPM with CPM < 5 in at least 3 samples (should I use a different method?)

What options would most accurately depict the variation in expression

Fit Type: Parametric vs Local vs Mean

Beta Prior: True vs False

Test Type: LRT vs Wald

Do you have any suggestion on what criteria would provide me with the most accurate results - and why

Am filtering the results to a padj < 0.05 and a fold change of 1, then doing enrichment on that gene set


Clone Disease Treatment Age
AT.1    A1  SMS   VPA       Y
AT.2    A2  SMS   VPA       Y
AT.3    A3  SMS   VPA       Y
AU.1    A1  SMS   Unt       Y
AU.2    A2  SMS   Unt       Y
AU.3    A3  SMS   Unt       Y
OT.1    O1  Con   VPA       Y
OT.2    O2  Con   VPA       O
OT.3    O3  Con   VPA       O
OU.1    O1  Con   Unt       Y
OU.2    O2  Con   Unt       O
OU.3    O3  Con   Unt       O

deseq2 • 56 views
ADD COMMENT
This thread is not open. No new answers may be added
Traffic: 1001 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6