Different geneset same p-values in topGO
1
0
Entering edit mode
@lluis-revilla-sancho
Last seen 29 days ago
European Union

I have performed the "elim" (It happens the same with the weight01 algorithm) test in the same gene universe selecting different genes. However the p-values are the same even if different number of genes are indicated as significant for the same GO.ID. Here is a reproducible example:

library("topGO")
data(GOdata)
geneSelectionFun(GOdata) <- function(x) {x == 1L}
GOdata
resultKS.elim <- runTest(GOdata, algorithm = "elim", statistic = "ks")
allRes1 <- GenTable(GOdata, resultKS.elim)
geneSelectionFun(GOdata) <- function(x) {x > 0.5}
GOdata
resultKS.elim2 <- runTest(GOdata, algorithm = "elim", statistic = "ks")
allRes2 <- GenTable(GOdata, resultKS.elim2)

In this case the GO terms with ID GO:0007067, GO:0051301, GO:0000087, GO:0022403, GO:0000226 have different number of "Significant" genes annotated, thus I expect to have a different p-value but it isn't reported different in each result table. Which makes me think if the elim algorithm is independent of the selected genes. Could the maintainer (or anyone else) explain it to  me?

topgo bug • 2.0k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Probably related if I set another ontology the same GO terms (they should be different!!) and p-values are used when retrieving scores:

ontology(GOdata) <- "CC"

resultKS.elim3 <- runTest(GOdata, algorithm = "elim", statistic = "ks")

GenTable(GOdata, resultKS.elim3)

       GO.ID Term Annotated Significant Expected result1
1  GO:0007067 <NA>       183          86    84.59 2.9e-09
2  GO:0051301 <NA>       126          67    58.25 9.6e-06
3  GO:0008202 <NA>         9           8     4.16 0.00084
4  GO:0022900 <NA>         8           7     3.70 0.00120
5  GO:0009267 <NA>         6           6     2.77 0.00157
6  GO:0007565 <NA>         8           7     3.70 0.00181
7  GO:0000087 <NA>       188          91    86.91 0.00187
8  GO:0006636 <NA>         9           7     4.16 0.00322
9  GO:0022403 <NA>       192          95    88.75 0.00414
10 GO:0000226 <NA>        30          21    13.87 0.00545
ADD REPLY
2
Entering edit mode
@lluis-revilla-sancho
Last seen 29 days ago
European Union

It seems that the statistic Ks doesn't filter first the genes using geneSelectionFun.

See this comment

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Wow ... 3.7 years later ...I admire your persistence :-)

(honestly, though: thanks for sharing your knowledge with us)

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

Thanks! :D This is the first package of Bioconductor I started with and I still don't fully understand how topGO works... But it wasn't my knowledge, I learned it from James!

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1043 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6