64-bit CPUs and bioconductor
2
0
Entering edit mode
@shinichiro-wachi-70
Last seen 9.6 years ago
Hello, Now that both PC and Mac have 64-bit CPU capable of addressing several gigabytes of RAM, will bioconductor be able to take advantage of this new feature without a major revision? I remember having a trouble trying to process 100+ chips at once due to limitation in addressable memory, so I'm curious. Shinichiro Wachi
• 814 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@wolfgang-huber-3550
Last seen 18 days ago
EMBL European Molecular Biology Laborat…
Hi Shinichiro Wachi, we've been running bioconductor on a 64 bit HP-UX machine for a while. And that is nice since it indeed gives you lots of RAM (in our case, up to 96 GB). The only issue is to get all the compilers and necessary libraries in 64 bit versions when you compile R and install bioconductor. There are -to my knowledge- no inherent limitations with R or bioconductor. Best wishes Wolfgang ------------------------------------- Wolfgang Huber Division of Molecular Genome Analysis German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Germany Phone: +49 6221 424709 Fax: +49 6221 42524709 Http: www.dkfz.de/mga/whuber ------------------------------------- On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Shinichiro Wachi wrote: > Hello, > > Now that both PC and Mac have 64-bit CPU capable of addressing several > gigabytes of RAM, will bioconductor be able to take advantage of this new > feature without a major revision? I remember having a trouble trying to > process 100+ chips at once due to limitation in addressable memory, so > I'm curious. > > Shinichiro Wachi
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@david-henderson-451
Last seen 9.6 years ago
Hello Shinichiro: > Now that both PC and Mac have 64-bit CPU capable of addressing several > gigabytes of RAM, will bioconductor be able to take advantage of this > new feature without a major revision? I remember having a trouble > trying to process 100+ chips at once due to limitation in addressable > memory, so I'm curious. I have been using Bioconductor on the new AMD x86-64 since at least June. Since I always compile from source, I was able to take advantage of the larger memory address space once I figured out the proper compiler options and no code changes to R or Bioconductor. Good Luck!! Dave H -- David A. Henderson, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Animal Genetics, CALS Assistant Professor of Biostatistics, AZCOPH 231 Shantz Building Department of Animal Science University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 Phone: (520)626-8903 Fax: (520)621-9435 DNADave@U.Arizona.Edu
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
David Henderson <dnadave@u.arizona.edu> writes: > > Now that both PC and Mac have 64-bit CPU capable of addressing several > > gigabytes of RAM, will bioconductor be able to take advantage of this > > new feature without a major revision? I remember having a trouble > > trying to process 100+ chips at once due to limitation in addressable > > memory, so I'm curious. > > I have been using Bioconductor on the new AMD x86-64 since at least > June. Since I always compile from source, I was able to take advantage > of the larger memory address space once I figured out the proper > compiler options and no code changes to R or Bioconductor. I think the R developer group would be interested in knowing which compilers and which options you used to compile R for the AMD x86-64. Also, what was your operating system - SuSE Linux? Have you tried compiling the beta test versions of R-1.8.0? If so, do they look ok too?
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 932 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6