GO.db for DO
1
0
Entering edit mode
@matthew-pocock-4529
Last seen 9.7 years ago
Hi, I've been using GO.db and find it very useful. I'd now like to have a similar API for the disease ontology (DO). Is there something I can read that may explain how to expose the DO data as a package? I guess I'm asking if there is a guide to how I would develop DO.db. Thanks, Matthew -- Matthew Pocock mailto: turingatemyhamster@gmail.com gchat: turingatemyhamster@gmail.com msn: matthew_pocock@yahoo.co.uk irc.freenode.net: drdozer (0191) 2566550 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
GO GO • 724 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@matthew-pocock-4529
Last seen 9.7 years ago
OH, I see that there is a DO.db in bioconductor already: http://www.bioconductor.org/help/bioc- views/release/data/annotation/html/DO.db.html <http: www.bioconductor.org="" help="" bioc-="" views="" release="" data="" annotation="" html="" do.db.html="">That is great. However, it doesn't seem to install for me. > biocLite("DO.db") Using R version 2.11.1, biocinstall version 2.6.9. Installing Bioconductor version 2.6 packages: [1] "DO.db" Please wait... Warning in install.packages(pkgs = pkgs, repos = repos, ...) : argument 'lib' is missing: using '/home/nmrp3/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/2.11' Warning message: In getDependencies(pkgs, dependencies, available, lib) : package ‘DO.db’ is not available It looks like I have bioconductor 2.6 but DO.db is packaged for 2.7. > source("http://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R") BioC_mirror = http://www.bioconductor.org Change using chooseBioCmirror(). > biocLite() Using R version 2.11.1, biocinstall version 2.6.9. Installing Bioconductor version 2.6 packages: [snip] So it looks like I'm being handed bioconductor 2.6 rather than 2.7 - perhaps this is because I allowed Ubuntu to install R version 2.11.1? Matthew On 5 March 2011 16:14, Matthew Pocock <turingatemyhamster@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've been using GO.db and find it very useful. I'd now like to have a > similar API for the disease ontology (DO). Is there something I can read > that may explain how to expose the DO data as a package? I guess I'm asking > if there is a guide to how I would develop DO.db. > > Thanks, > > Matthew > > -- > Matthew Pocock > mailto: turingatemyhamster@gmail.com > gchat: turingatemyhamster@gmail.com > msn: matthew_pocock@yahoo.co.uk > irc.freenode.net: drdozer > (0191) 2566550 > > -- Matthew Pocock mailto: turingatemyhamster@gmail.com gchat: turingatemyhamster@gmail.com msn: matthew_pocock@yahoo.co.uk irc.freenode.net: drdozer (0191) 2566550 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
On 03/05/2011 08:50 AM, Matthew Pocock wrote: > OH, I see that there is a DO.db in bioconductor already: > > http://www.bioconductor.org/help/bioc- views/release/data/annotation/html/DO.db.html > > <http: www.bioconductor.org="" help="" bioc-="" views="" release="" data="" annotation="" html="" do.db.html="">That > is great. However, it doesn't seem to install for me. > >> biocLite("DO.db") > Using R version 2.11.1, biocinstall version 2.6.9. > Installing Bioconductor version 2.6 packages: > [1] "DO.db" > Please wait... > > Warning in install.packages(pkgs = pkgs, repos = repos, ...) : > argument 'lib' is missing: using > '/home/nmrp3/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/2.11' > Warning message: > In getDependencies(pkgs, dependencies, available, lib) : > package ?DO.db? is not available > > It looks like I have bioconductor 2.6 but DO.db is packaged for 2.7. > >> source("http://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R") > BioC_mirror = http://www.bioconductor.org > Change using chooseBioCmirror(). >> biocLite() > Using R version 2.11.1, biocinstall version 2.6.9. > Installing Bioconductor version 2.6 packages: > [snip] > > So it looks like I'm being handed bioconductor 2.6 rather than 2.7 - perhaps > this is because I allowed Ubuntu to install R version 2.11.1? yes, Bioconductor is versioned to correspond with R. R.2.11.* -> Bioc 2.6; R.2.12.* -> Bioc 2.7. So update your R (and installed packages, e.g., http://bioconductor.org/install/#update-bioconductor-packages) and you'll have access to DO.db. Martin > > Matthew > > On 5 March 2011 16:14, Matthew Pocock <turingatemyhamster at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've been using GO.db and find it very useful. I'd now like to have a >> similar API for the disease ontology (DO). Is there something I can read >> that may explain how to expose the DO data as a package? I guess I'm asking >> if there is a guide to how I would develop DO.db. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matthew >> >> -- >> Matthew Pocock >> mailto: turingatemyhamster at gmail.com >> gchat: turingatemyhamster at gmail.com >> msn: matthew_pocock at yahoo.co.uk >> irc.freenode.net: drdozer >> (0191) 2566550 >> >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor -- Computational Biology Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N. PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109 Location: M1-B861 Telephone: 206 667-2793
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
Thanks :) That's worked a treat. > yes, Bioconductor is versioned to correspond with R. R.2.11.* -> Bioc > 2.6; R.2.12.* -> Bioc 2.7. So update your R (and installed packages, > e.g., http://bioconductor.org/install/#update-bioconductor-packages) and > you'll have access to DO.db. > > Martin > > -- Matthew Pocock mailto: turingatemyhamster@gmail.com gchat: turingatemyhamster@gmail.com msn: matthew_pocock@yahoo.co.uk irc.freenode.net: drdozer (0191) 2566550 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 419 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6