useDevel and update all packages - wrong library location?
1
0
Entering edit mode
Janet Young ▴ 740
@janet-young-2360
Last seen 4.9 years ago
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center,…
Hi there, Until now I haven't used the devel versions of bioc packages at all, but after looking at the instructions at http://www.bioconductor.org/developers/useDevel/ I've started to do that (I want to maintain parallel release and devel installations). Installing individual packages with biocLite e.g. source("http://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R") biocLite("Rsamtools") worked OK - it put the new packages in the right location. It worked well a couple of times in a row. However, after biocLite gets done installing an individual package, it looks for other out-of-date packages and asks whether I want to update all, some or none. I reply "all" and it then installs devel versions of the packages in the wrong place - in my release version library dir rather than the devel version library dir. My Rdevel is aliased to "setenv R_LIBS_USER /home/jayoung/traskdata/lib_linux_gizmo/Rdevel ; R" and from my Rdevel session, here are a couple of possibly useful outputs: .libPaths() [1] "/home/btrask/traskdata/lib_linux_gizmo/Rdevel" [2] "/home/btrask/traskdata/lib_linux_gizmo/R/library" .Library [1] "/home/btrask/traskdata/lib_linux_gizmo/R/library" Is .Library what's used as the destination dir - shouldn't it be the same as .libPaths()[1] ? I wonder if I've misunderstood something here - any tips? thanks very much, Janet ------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Janet Young Tapscott and Malik labs Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Avenue N., C3-168, P.O. Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA. tel: (206) 667 1471 fax: (206) 667 6524 email: jayoung ...at... fhcrc.org -------------------------------------------------------------------
Cancer Cancer • 720 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@martin-morgan-1513
Last seen 10 weeks ago
United States
On 08/15/2012 11:41 AM, Janet Young wrote: > Hi there, > > Until now I haven't used the devel versions of bioc packages at all, but after looking at the instructions at http://www.bioconductor.org/developers/useDevel/ I've started to do that (I want to maintain parallel release and devel installations). > > Installing individual packages with biocLite e.g. > source("http://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R") > biocLite("Rsamtools") > worked OK - it put the new packages in the right location. It worked well a couple of times in a row. > > However, after biocLite gets done installing an individual package, it looks for other out-of-date packages and asks whether I want to update all, some or none. I reply "all" and it then installs devel versions of the packages in the wrong place - in my release version library dir rather than the devel version library dir. > > My Rdevel is aliased to "setenv R_LIBS_USER /home/jayoung/traskdata/lib_linux_gizmo/Rdevel ; R" > > and from my Rdevel session, here are a couple of possibly useful outputs: > .libPaths() > [1] "/home/btrask/traskdata/lib_linux_gizmo/Rdevel" > [2] "/home/btrask/traskdata/lib_linux_gizmo/R/library" > > .Library > [1] "/home/btrask/traskdata/lib_linux_gizmo/R/library" > > Is .Library what's used as the destination dir - shouldn't it be the same as .libPaths()[1] ? Hi Janet -- I think the confusion here is that update.packages() (which is used when you ask for a package to be updated) tries to do the update in the directory where the out-of-date package is installed. I think this is the right thing to do. I guess you have some Bioc packages in both locations [1] and [2], and that you're expecting [2] to contain just release versions of the package. But that's a version of R with some release, some devel versions of Bioc packages, which is not what you want. Here's the content of my .libPaths()[2] > dir(.libPaths()[2]) [1] "base" "boot" "class" "cluster" "codetools" [6] "compiler" "datasets" "foreign" "graphics" "grDevices" [11] "grid" "KernSmooth" "lattice" "MASS" "Matrix" [16] "methods" "mgcv" "nlme" "nnet" "parallel" [21] "rpart" "spatial" "splines" "stats" "stats4" [26] "survival" "tcltk" "tools" "utils" just base and recommended packages, whose update status is not tied to Bioc version. Not sure if that clarifies or not? Martin > > I wonder if I've misunderstood something here - any tips? > > thanks very much, > > Janet > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Dr. Janet Young > > Tapscott and Malik labs > > Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center > 1100 Fairview Avenue N., C3-168, > P.O. Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA. > > tel: (206) 667 1471 fax: (206) 667 6524 > email: jayoung ...at... fhcrc.org > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > -- Computational Biology / Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N. PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109 Location: Arnold Building M1 B861 Phone: (206) 667-2793
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 511 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6