obtaining the counts after batch effect removal
1
0
Entering edit mode
Guest User ★ 13k
@guest-user-4897
Last seen 9.6 years ago
Hello, I have a question regarding a design, in which there is a factor for "batch effect". I understand how to get the p-values when taking in account the batch factor. I wanted to ask whether it is possible to obtain also the actual counts after batch effect removal. Thanks a lot, Gilgi -- output of sessionInfo(): none -- Sent via the guest posting facility at bioconductor.org.
• 1.1k views
ADD COMMENT •
0
Entering edit mode
@mikelove
Last seen 4 hours ago
United States
hi Gilgi, By incorporating batch variables into the generalized linear model, we control for these effects, but what is happening is not a two step process of removal and then testing. Mike On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Gilgi [guest] <guest@bioconductor.org>wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a question regarding a design, in which there is a factor for > "batch effect". I understand how to get the p-values when taking in account > the batch factor. > > I wanted to ask whether it is possible to obtain also the actual counts > after batch effect removal. > > Thanks a lot, > Gilgi > > -- output of sessionInfo(): > > none > > -- > Sent via the guest posting facility at bioconductor.org. > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD COMMENT •
0
Entering edit mode
hi Gilgi, Please keep all discussion on list, we like to keep a record of questions and answers for all Bioc users. The short answer is no, we don't offer any batch removal functions, something analogous to residuals after fitting the batch effect for Gaussian distributed data. We do offer the two transformations (described in the vignette) for producing log2 scale data with stable variance across the range of counts (i.e. homoskedastic). The transformed data could then be used with various packages for removing batch effect. Mike On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Michael Love <michaelisaiahlove@gmail.com>wrote: > hi Gilgi, > > By incorporating batch variables into the generalized linear model, we > control for these effects, but what is happening is not a two step process > of removal and then testing. > > Mike > > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Gilgi [guest] <guest@bioconductor.org>wrote: > >> >> Hello, >> >> I have a question regarding a design, in which there is a factor for >> "batch effect". I understand how to get the p-values when taking in account >> the batch factor. >> >> I wanted to ask whether it is possible to obtain also the actual counts >> after batch effect removal. >> >> Thanks a lot, >> Gilgi >> >> -- output of sessionInfo(): >> >> none >> >> -- >> Sent via the guest posting facility at bioconductor.org. >> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
Hi Mike, Thanks a lot. Could you possibly refer to packages that can take as input the DESeq transformed values for removing the batch effect? Thanks a lot, Gilgi From: Michael Love [mailto:michaelisaiahlove@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 10:10 PM To: Gilgi [guest] Cc: bioconductor@r-project.org; Gilgi Friedlander Subject: Re: obtaining the counts after batch effect removal hi Gilgi, Please keep all discussion on list, we like to keep a record of questions and answers for all Bioc users. The short answer is no, we don't offer any batch removal functions, something analogous to residuals after fitting the batch effect for Gaussian distributed data. We do offer the two transformations (described in the vignette) for producing log2 scale data with stable variance across the range of counts (i.e. homoskedastic). The transformed data could then be used with various packages for removing batch effect. Mike On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Michael Love <michaelisaiahlove@gmail.com<mailto:michaelisaiahlove@gmail.com>> wrote: hi Gilgi, By incorporating batch variables into the generalized linear model, we control for these effects, but what is happening is not a two step process of removal and then testing. Mike On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Gilgi [guest] <guest@bioconductor.org<mailto:guest@bioconductor.org>> wrote: Hello, I have a question regarding a design, in which there is a factor for "batch effect". I understand how to get the p-values when taking in account the batch factor. I wanted to ask whether it is possible to obtain also the actual counts after batch effect removal. Thanks a lot, Gilgi -- output of sessionInfo(): none -- Sent via the guest posting facility at bioconductor.org<http: bioconductor.org="">. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
Gilgi the ?sva? package from Bioconductor, or the PEER package (http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3398141) would seem like good places to start. Wolfgang Il giorno 20 Jan 2014, alle ore 08:18, Gilgi Friedlander <gilgi.friedlander at="" weizmann.ac.il=""> ha scritto: > Hi Mike, > > Thanks a lot. > > Could you possibly refer to packages that can take as input the DESeq transformed values for removing the batch effect? > > Thanks a lot, > Gilgi > > From: Michael Love [mailto:michaelisaiahlove at gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 10:10 PM > To: Gilgi [guest] > Cc: bioconductor at r-project.org; Gilgi Friedlander > Subject: Re: obtaining the counts after batch effect removal > > hi Gilgi, > > Please keep all discussion on list, we like to keep a record of questions and answers for all Bioc users. > > The short answer is no, we don't offer any batch removal functions, something analogous to residuals after fitting the batch effect for Gaussian distributed data. > > We do offer the two transformations (described in the vignette) for producing log2 scale data with stable variance across the range of counts (i.e. homoskedastic). The transformed data could then be used with various packages for removing batch effect. > > Mike > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Michael Love <michaelisaiahlove at="" gmail.com<mailto:michaelisaiahlove="" at="" gmail.com="">> wrote: > hi Gilgi, > > By incorporating batch variables into the generalized linear model, we control for these effects, but what is happening is not a two step process of removal and then testing. > > Mike > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Gilgi [guest] <guest at="" bioconductor.org<mailto:guest="" at="" bioconductor.org="">> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a question regarding a design, in which there is a factor for "batch effect". I understand how to get the p-values when taking in account the batch factor. > > I wanted to ask whether it is possible to obtain also the actual counts after batch effect removal. > > Thanks a lot, > Gilgi > > -- output of sessionInfo(): > > none > > -- > Sent via the guest posting facility at bioconductor.org<http: bioconductor.org="">. > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
Thanks a lot! Gilgi -----Original Message----- From: Wolfgang Huber [mailto:whuber@embl.de] Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 10:12 AM To: Gilgi Friedlander Cc: bioconductor at r-project.org Subject: Re: [BioC] obtaining the counts after batch effect removal Gilgi the 'sva' package from Bioconductor, or the PEER package (http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3398141) would seem like good places to start. Wolfgang Il giorno 20 Jan 2014, alle ore 08:18, Gilgi Friedlander <gilgi.friedlander at="" weizmann.ac.il=""> ha scritto: > Hi Mike, > > Thanks a lot. > > Could you possibly refer to packages that can take as input the DESeq transformed values for removing the batch effect? > > Thanks a lot, > Gilgi > > From: Michael Love [mailto:michaelisaiahlove at gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 10:10 PM > To: Gilgi [guest] > Cc: bioconductor at r-project.org; Gilgi Friedlander > Subject: Re: obtaining the counts after batch effect removal > > hi Gilgi, > > Please keep all discussion on list, we like to keep a record of questions and answers for all Bioc users. > > The short answer is no, we don't offer any batch removal functions, something analogous to residuals after fitting the batch effect for Gaussian distributed data. > > We do offer the two transformations (described in the vignette) for producing log2 scale data with stable variance across the range of counts (i.e. homoskedastic). The transformed data could then be used with various packages for removing batch effect. > > Mike > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Michael Love <michaelisaiahlove at="" gmail.com<mailto:michaelisaiahlove="" at="" gmail.com="">> wrote: > hi Gilgi, > > By incorporating batch variables into the generalized linear model, we control for these effects, but what is happening is not a two step process of removal and then testing. > > Mike > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Gilgi [guest] <guest at="" bioconductor.org<mailto:guest="" at="" bioconductor.org="">> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a question regarding a design, in which there is a factor for "batch effect". I understand how to get the p-values when taking in account the batch factor. > > I wanted to ask whether it is possible to obtain also the actual counts after batch effect removal. > > Thanks a lot, > Gilgi > > -- output of sessionInfo(): > > none > > -- > Sent via the guest posting facility at bioconductor.org<http: bioconductor.org="">. > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
ADD REPLY •

Login before adding your answer.

Similar Posts
Loading Similar Posts
Traffic: 792 users visited in the last hour
Content Search
Users
Tags
Badges
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6