Warning message while trying to install Bioconductor
1
0
Entering edit mode
@wolfgang-huber-3550
Last seen 3 months ago
EMBL European Molecular Biology Laborat…
On 31 May 2014, at 23:53, Steve Lianoglou <lianoglou.steve at="" gene.com=""> wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Felix Francis [guest] >> While trying to install Bioconductor, I get this warning message: >> installed directory not writable, cannot update packages 'boot', 'class', 'cluster', 'foreign', 'KernSmooth', 'lattice', 'MASS', >> 'Matrix', 'mgcv', 'nlme', 'nnet', 'rpart', 'spatial' > > It sounds like you do not have permissions to write into the installed > directory that R was installed in on the computer you are using. > > Running the update/install as an administrator on the machine would > likely do the trick. Depending on how valuable the machine is, or how many users work with it, it is preferable to install R as well as its libraries with an account with limited rights; and then to use that account also for package updates and the installation of additional packages, as what Felix is trying to do. Doing it as administrator seems like leaving a hole for through which bad things could be done (intentionally or unintentionally) . I?ve not yet seen this actually happening, though. Wolfgang
• 1.2k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@kasper-daniel-hansen-2979
Last seen 18 months ago
United States
And as a followup: what I do in a multi-user environment (and after some years of experience I think this is the best approach) is to immediately make a site-library directory where I install all packages. Basically we have groups like 1) me 2) people allowed to install R packages system-wide 3) most users I set the permissions of site-library to be 2), but the standard library is always 1) because it is installed as part of R. This mean any user in 2) who (say) tried to update all installed R packages system-wide will be told that the packages included with R cannot be updated; exactly the situation the OP described. Best, Kasper On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Wolfgang Huber <whuber@embl.de> wrote: > > On 31 May 2014, at 23:53, Steve Lianoglou <lianoglou.steve@gene.com> > wrote: > > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Felix Francis [guest] > >> While trying to install Bioconductor, I get this warning message: > >> installed directory not writable, cannot update packages 'boot', > 'class', 'cluster', 'foreign', 'KernSmooth', 'lattice', 'MASS', > >> 'Matrix', 'mgcv', 'nlme', 'nnet', 'rpart', 'spatial' > > > > It sounds like you do not have permissions to write into the installed > > directory that R was installed in on the computer you are using. > > > > Running the update/install as an administrator on the machine would > > likely do the trick. > > Depending on how valuable the machine is, or how many users work with it, > it is preferable to install R as well as its libraries with an account with > limited rights; and then to use that account also for package updates and > the installation of additional packages, as what Felix is trying to do. > > Doing it as administrator seems like leaving a hole for through which bad > things could be done (intentionally or unintentionally) . I’ve not yet seen > this actually happening, though. > > Wolfgang > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
On 06/02/2014 07:28 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: > And as a followup: what I do in a multi-user environment (and after some > years of experience I think this is the best approach) is to immediately > make a site-library directory where I install all packages. Basically we > have groups like > 1) me > 2) people allowed to install R packages system-wide > 3) most users > I set the permissions of site-library to be 2), but the standard library is > always 1) because it is installed as part of R. This mean any user in 2) > who (say) tried to update all installed R packages system-wide will be told > that the packages included with R cannot be updated; exactly the situation > the OP described. I went looking in the R-admin manual for best practices along these lines, and was a little surprised not to see anything. Did I miss something? The warning seems worth-while, even if the person receiving the message is not in a position to do anything about it; maybe they'll hassle their sys admin? Is there a better way of phrasing the message to make it more informative / tolerable? Martin > > Best, > Kasper > > > > > On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Wolfgang Huber <whuber at="" embl.de=""> wrote: > >> >> On 31 May 2014, at 23:53, Steve Lianoglou <lianoglou.steve at="" gene.com=""> >> wrote: >>> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Felix Francis [guest] >>>> While trying to install Bioconductor, I get this warning message: >>>> installed directory not writable, cannot update packages 'boot', >> 'class', 'cluster', 'foreign', 'KernSmooth', 'lattice', 'MASS', >>>> 'Matrix', 'mgcv', 'nlme', 'nnet', 'rpart', 'spatial' >>> >>> It sounds like you do not have permissions to write into the installed >>> directory that R was installed in on the computer you are using. >>> >>> Running the update/install as an administrator on the machine would >>> likely do the trick. >> >> Depending on how valuable the machine is, or how many users work with it, >> it is preferable to install R as well as its libraries with an account with >> limited rights; and then to use that account also for package updates and >> the installation of additional packages, as what Felix is trying to do. >> >> Doing it as administrator seems like leaving a hole for through which bad >> things could be done (intentionally or unintentionally) . I???ve not yet seen >> this actually happening, though. >> >> Wolfgang >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioconductor mailing list >> Bioconductor at r-project.org >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >> Search the archives: >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > -- Computational Biology / Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N. PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109 Location: Arnold Building M1 B861 Phone: (206) 667-2793
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
The warning is appropriate. Wolfgang and I are disagreeing with Steve's suggestion that the OP should just update/install as administrator. Best, Kasper On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Martin Morgan <mtmorgan@fhcrc.org> wrote: > On 06/02/2014 07:28 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: > >> And as a followup: what I do in a multi-user environment (and after some >> years of experience I think this is the best approach) is to immediately >> make a site-library directory where I install all packages. Basically we >> have groups like >> 1) me >> 2) people allowed to install R packages system-wide >> 3) most users >> I set the permissions of site-library to be 2), but the standard library >> is >> always 1) because it is installed as part of R. This mean any user in 2) >> who (say) tried to update all installed R packages system-wide will be >> told >> that the packages included with R cannot be updated; exactly the situation >> the OP described. >> > > I went looking in the R-admin manual for best practices along these lines, > and was a little surprised not to see anything. Did I miss something? > > The warning seems worth-while, even if the person receiving the message is > not in a position to do anything about it; maybe they'll hassle their sys > admin? Is there a better way of phrasing the message to make it more > informative / tolerable? > > Martin > >> >> Best, >> Kasper >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Wolfgang Huber <whuber@embl.de> wrote: >> >> >>> On 31 May 2014, at 23:53, Steve Lianoglou <lianoglou.steve@gene.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Felix Francis [guest] >>>> >>>>> While trying to install Bioconductor, I get this warning message: >>>>> installed directory not writable, cannot update packages 'boot', >>>>> >>>> 'class', 'cluster', 'foreign', 'KernSmooth', 'lattice', 'MASS', >>> >>>> 'Matrix', 'mgcv', 'nlme', 'nnet', 'rpart', 'spatial' >>>>> >>>> >>>> It sounds like you do not have permissions to write into the installed >>>> directory that R was installed in on the computer you are using. >>>> >>>> Running the update/install as an administrator on the machine would >>>> likely do the trick. >>>> >>> >>> Depending on how valuable the machine is, or how many users work with it, >>> it is preferable to install R as well as its libraries with an account >>> with >>> limited rights; and then to use that account also for package updates and >>> the installation of additional packages, as what Felix is trying to do. >>> >>> Doing it as administrator seems like leaving a hole for through which bad >>> things could be done (intentionally or unintentionally) . I’ve not yet >>> seen >>> >>> this actually happening, though. >>> >>> Wolfgang >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bioconductor mailing list >>> Bioconductor@r-project.org >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >>> Search the archives: >>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >>> >>> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioconductor mailing list >> Bioconductor@r-project.org >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane. >> science.biology.informatics.conductor >> >> > > -- > Computational Biology / Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center > 1100 Fairview Ave. N. > PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109 > > Location: Arnold Building M1 B861 > Phone: (206) 667-2793 > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
Hi, For the record: I was not offering advice on the best way to install and maintain R on a single user or multi user setting. I only suggested to install as admin because my "reading between the lines" lead me to guess that the OP was most likely using a personal machine (ie. not working on/administering a multi-user machine) and also had limited sys admin experience so painstakingly outlining an admin strategy was likely not what he was after.. There are much better/correct ways to install R in these situations, as you all are rightly pointing out, however my impression was that the OP just needed to give the proverbial TV a swift knock on its side to shake out the static in the picture and I was just pointing to a spot that could be whacked so he could get on with viewing the intended show (apologies to those of you who are lost by now who have only ever known TVs to be of the plasma/LCD variety) If I were giving any type of "official" advice (from my point of view), it'd probably be something similar to the 3 tiered approach Kasper outlines, but I'd encourage people to make use of a versioned R_LIBS_USER directory to maintain their own updated version of packages (even replacing (by precedence) the same package that might be installed by your "group 2"). -steve On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen <kasperdanielhansen at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: > The warning is appropriate. Wolfgang and I are disagreeing with Steve's > suggestion that the OP should just update/install as administrator. > > Best, > Kasper > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Martin Morgan <mtmorgan at="" fhcrc.org=""> wrote: > >> On 06/02/2014 07:28 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: >> >>> And as a followup: what I do in a multi-user environment (and after some >>> years of experience I think this is the best approach) is to immediately >>> make a site-library directory where I install all packages. Basically we >>> have groups like >>> 1) me >>> 2) people allowed to install R packages system-wide >>> 3) most users >>> I set the permissions of site-library to be 2), but the standard library >>> is >>> always 1) because it is installed as part of R. This mean any user in 2) >>> who (say) tried to update all installed R packages system-wide will be >>> told >>> that the packages included with R cannot be updated; exactly the situation >>> the OP described. >>> >> >> I went looking in the R-admin manual for best practices along these lines, >> and was a little surprised not to see anything. Did I miss something? >> >> The warning seems worth-while, even if the person receiving the message is >> not in a position to do anything about it; maybe they'll hassle their sys >> admin? Is there a better way of phrasing the message to make it more >> informative / tolerable? >> >> Martin >> >>> >>> Best, >>> Kasper >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Wolfgang Huber <whuber at="" embl.de=""> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 31 May 2014, at 23:53, Steve Lianoglou <lianoglou.steve at="" gene.com=""> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Felix Francis [guest] >>>>> >>>>>> While trying to install Bioconductor, I get this warning message: >>>>>> installed directory not writable, cannot update packages 'boot', >>>>>> >>>>> 'class', 'cluster', 'foreign', 'KernSmooth', 'lattice', 'MASS', >>>> >>>>> 'Matrix', 'mgcv', 'nlme', 'nnet', 'rpart', 'spatial' >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It sounds like you do not have permissions to write into the installed >>>>> directory that R was installed in on the computer you are using. >>>>> >>>>> Running the update/install as an administrator on the machine would >>>>> likely do the trick. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Depending on how valuable the machine is, or how many users work with it, >>>> it is preferable to install R as well as its libraries with an account >>>> with >>>> limited rights; and then to use that account also for package updates and >>>> the installation of additional packages, as what Felix is trying to do. >>>> >>>> Doing it as administrator seems like leaving a hole for through which bad >>>> things could be done (intentionally or unintentionally) . I? EURO (tm)ve not yet >>>> seen >>>> >>>> this actually happening, though. >>>> >>>> Wolfgang >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Bioconductor mailing list >>>> Bioconductor at r-project.org >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >>>> Search the archives: >>>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >>>> >>>> >>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bioconductor mailing list >>> Bioconductor at r-project.org >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >>> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane. >>> science.biology.informatics.conductor >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Computational Biology / Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center >> 1100 Fairview Ave. N. >> PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109 >> >> Location: Arnold Building M1 B861 >> Phone: (206) 667-2793 >> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor -- Steve Lianoglou Computational Biologist Genentech
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 521 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6